Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Off Topic - General (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Get it yet? Dems/Newsome are the party of the priviledged elite (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=175193)

Andy Asaro 03-15-2023 01:33 PM

Get it yet? Dems/Newsome are the party of the priviledged elite
 




Andy Asaro 03-15-2023 01:50 PM

Go ahead and combine with the other bank thread.

mostpost 03-15-2023 02:08 PM

Try to get something right for a change. There is no bailout of SVB. Depositors are being made whole. If Newsom has an account or accounts at the bank, why should he not be included.

Newsom had nothing to with these decisions. They were made in Washington but the White House, Treasury, and FDIC.

PaceAdvantage 03-15-2023 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mostpost (Post 2864238)
Try to get something right for a change. There is no bailout of SVB. Depositors are being made whole. If Newsom has an account or accounts at the bank, why should he not be included.

Newsom had nothing to with these decisions. They were made in Washington but the White House, Treasury, and FDIC.

tee hee hee!

boxcar 03-15-2023 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mostpost (Post 2864238)
Try to get something right for a change. There is no bailout of SVB. Depositors are being made whole. If Newsom has an account or accounts at the bank, why should he not be included.

Newsom had nothing to with these decisions. They were made in Washington but the White House, Treasury, and FDIC.

Explain the difference between the two highlighted sentences.

Inner Dirt 03-15-2023 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mostpost (Post 2864238)
Try to get something right for a change. There is no bailout of SVB. Depositors are being made whole. If Newsom has an account or accounts at the bank, why should he not be included.

Newsom had nothing to with these decisions. They were made in Washington but the White House, Treasury, and FDIC.


I asked you to share with us what exact regulations that were rolled back during the Trump administration could have prevented the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank. I hope this isn't another situation where you are parroting crap and talking out your ass again. I don't know squat about banking regulations, please inform us.


It has been "widely reported" that Newsome violated protocol over issues with Silicon Valley Bank.


Also I see once again you lead with an insult, the weak game of a Democrat.

mostpost 03-15-2023 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boxcar (Post 2864242)
Explain the difference between the two highlighted sentences.

There is no bailout of SVB. Depositors are being made whole.

The first sentence refers to the owners and stockholders of SVB. The money they lost is gone. They will not be rewarded for mismanagement or incompetence. Or criminal behavior if such occurred.

The second sentence refers to people and businesses who have accounts with the bank. People who, in most cases have no say in the management or operations of the bank. Their deposits are guaranteed up to $250,000 by the FDIC. In addition to the amounts over $250,000 are guaranteed by a fund financed by the nations banks.

PaceAdvantage 03-15-2023 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mostpost (Post 2864250)
In addition to the amounts over $250,000 are guaranteed by a fund financed by the nations banks.

Financed by the banks?

No sucker.

Financed by people like you and me who will end up paying higher fees to cover this "financed by the banks" nonsense.

So clueless you liberals are...

davew 03-15-2023 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mostpost (Post 2864250)
There is no bailout of SVB. Depositors are being made whole.

The first sentence refers to the owners and stockholders of SVB. The money they lost is gone. They will not be rewarded for mismanagement or incompetence. Or criminal behavior if such occurred.

The second sentence refers to people and businesses who have accounts with the bank. People who, in most cases have no say in the management or operations of the bank. Their deposits are guaranteed up to $250,000 by the FDIC. In addition to the amounts over $250,000 are guaranteed by a fund financed by the nations banks.

A tech company had $400 million in their account, are they being made 'whole' ????? by what 'fund'?

davew 03-15-2023 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inner Dirt (Post 2864247)
I asked you to share with us what exact regulations that were rolled back during the Trump administration could have prevented the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank. I hope this isn't another situation where you are parroting crap and talking out your ass again. I don't know squat about banking regulations, please inform us.


It has been "widely reported" that Newsome violated protocol over issues with Silicon Valley Bank.


Also I see once again you lead with an insult, the weak game of a Democrat.

COME ON MAN, parrots can NOT answer specific question as they just repeat 'talking points' :lol::lol::lol:

mostpost 03-15-2023 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inner Dirt (Post 2864247)
I asked you to share with us what exact regulations that were rolled back during the Trump administration could have prevented the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank. I hope this isn't another situation where you are parroting crap and talking out your ass again. I don't know squat about banking regulations, please inform us.


It has been "widely reported" that Newsome violated protocol over issues with Silicon Valley Bank.


Also I see once again you lead with an insult, the weak game of a Democrat.

I am far from an expert on banking regulations. If you know squat plus very little.

This is what I do know. Trump changed the threshold for which banks could be regulated from banks with assets over $50B to banks with over $250B. This meant many very large banks were no longer subject to regulation.

Nobody is saying deregulation is the only problem. Bad decisions by SVB is certainly a major factor. But proper regulations may have caught those bad decisions before they caused such damage.

Please explain what you mean by Newsom violating protocol, then I can respond. If you’re referring to Newsom encouraging the Biden Administration to act to protect the citizens of his state, don’t bother.

Inner Dirt 03-15-2023 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davew (Post 2864256)
COME ON MAN, parrots can NOT answer specific question as they just repeat 'talking points' :lol::lol::lol:


I just keep looking to find any subject where Cliff Clavin knows more than the average middle aged man or woman, I have yet to see anything, other than how to constantly insult people. Most everyone has something they are better at than the common human, Cliffy has nothing, yet he will constantly engage those wiser than him on a subject and then run and hide when they stomp him into the ground. I am always curious how someone could turn out like him.

Inner Dirt 03-15-2023 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mostpost (Post 2864262)
I am far from an expert on banking regulations. If you know squat plus very little.

This is what I do know. Trump changed the threshold for which banks could be regulated from banks with assets over $50B to banks with over $250B. This meant many very large banks were no longer subject to regulation.

Nobody is saying deregulation is the only problem. Bad decisions by SVB is certainly a major factor. But proper regulations may have caught those bad decisions before they caused such damage.

Please explain what you mean by Newsom violating protocol, then I can respond. If you’re referring to Newsom encouraging the Biden Administration to act to protect the citizens of his state, don’t bother.


What are the specific regulations, please explain. Newsome lobbied on behalf of a bank that he had an interest in, that is a no no.

xtb 03-15-2023 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inner Dirt (Post 2864266)
Most everyone has something they are better at than the common human, Cliffy has nothing

I heard that Musty could usually get mail into the correct mailbox.

TJDave 03-15-2023 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage (Post 2864252)
Financed by the banks?

No sucker.

Financed by people like you and me who will end up paying higher fees to cover this "financed by the banks"

I don’t pay any fees.

One of the blessings of being old and paying my bills on time.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved

» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.