Sarah Suess
 

Palin does CPAC

Video

What a sad commentary on the state of the Republican party that this person would be taken seriously in any way.

Funny, we say the same thing about Obama.
Sara speaks what many here believe is the only reason to have a United States.

If we wanted what Obama offers, we could just move north. :rolleyes:

Yeah, but she got Ukraine right...........

Your American hero looks like the tool he is.......

Palin is an intelligent, competent person who got pushed up the ladder above her level of competence because of the way the game is played. Objectively, she was not VP material. And equally objectively, she was more qualified to be VP than Obama was qualified to be a US Senator, let alone POTUS. Which is the really sad thing about the whole situation.

You guys may not like Obama. That is your prerogative and I am fine with that. However, if you can give any credibility to Sarah Palin we obviously can't have an intelligent conversation.

The same would go for Donald Trump. The guy is a caricature of himself, likes to fly the candidate balloon to garner more media attention, but has zero ability to actually run for office.

Sarah Palin is very good at what she is doing now. Separating conservatives from their money. Everything she does is designed to just that. If you come from a grifter heritage like I do, she is a marvel to watch.

You are the one that made a personal attack on Palin without regard to content, and you think that is the basis for intelligent conversation?

I didn't ask for any conversation.

I made a personal comment on her lack of content, not a personal attack on her. If I'm attacking anyone it is the people who give her credibility when she is unworthy. It's not her fault that she is being raised upon the shoulders of the conservatives. She is right to enjoy the ride while it lasts.

Just don't attack the President when you blindly support Mama Grizzly! :lol:

Sounds like you're really talking about Al Gore Jr., self-described inventor of the Internet, global-warming/climate change charlatan and business partner with Muslim terrorist front groups.

Good! Don't participate. :rolleyes:

I attack Obama for his proven incompetence at any endeavor other than campaigning.

I firmly support Mama Grizzly for her proven competence:


https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.n...52833996_n.jpg

I agree and I don't like Obama either....witch begs the question. Why do they keep winning??? Take a look at that collection of (minds???) and its plain as day. If CPAC has any say it will be 8 more years of Hillary or whoever the Dem is. The republican party is literally a brain fart when they put people like this front and center....they're own people even know this but they are afraid of the wackadoo base. I wouldn't watch that crap for anything but I saw this and several other clips. The only one that makes sense is Chris Christie because he realizes you have to win some or you can sit there and bitch about whoever kicks your sorry ass the next time.......again.....all you have to do is watch 30 seconds of her or several other of them and it doesn't take a "rocket scientist" to realize it spells LOSER with the voters. I wish the libertarians would push harder because I think they are primed to suck the life out of that republican party...it pisses me off every time they bring up the spying...they INVENTED IT when their boy was in there! You can't be against the so called Patriot Act, the NSA and all the other "gotta make folks safe" by tracking them move....when you loved the idea AT FIRST! Crocodile tears......

I like Palin more these days then I did after her VP run. I think those who continue to try and push the narrative that she is operating with an IQ barely in the triple digits are becoming disgraceful and irrelevant.

Much like Obama's plummeting job approval ratings, only going in the opposite direction, I see Palin rising above her media-imposed jail sentence of idiocy. It may take another year or two, but it is coming.

In fact, Palin and Obama are two sides of a coin when it comes to the media.

They both started as unprepared and unskilled for the jobs they were seeking, yet one was PROPPED UP mercilessly, just as much as the other was BEATEN DOWN mercilessly, which resulted in their respective standings in the public eye when election 2008 was all said and done.

Time, however, has a way of revealing the truth, no matter what the power elites want us to believe.

Amen! Great post.......

Republicans can't win the Presidency ever again, unless the Dems do something catastrophic. Settling for the two houses of Congress is good enough for now.

exactly right. people question Palin's intelligence and experience yet worship at the alter of Obama while there is no objective evidence of Obama's intellect, quite the opposite, and plenty of evidence of his incompetence.

Palin gets no rspect. :lol:

Well, it's good to know where I stand in your eyes! And here I though you held me in high regard.

The rumors are growing about Hillary's health. If she doesn't/can't run, it is a wide open race, with no obvious choice on either side. If Hillary is out and Biden is the aging heir apparent, there is a good chance another Obama-like dark horse (pardon the expression) comes out of nowhere and grabs the Dem nomination. I think the folks in the middle of the political spectrum have had enough of unproven promises for a while. If that happens, the election is the Republicans' to lose.

You and those like you are absolutely ridiculous with your stubborn and relentless hold on the "Palin is dumber than a tree stump" narrative. There is no other way to put it.

The sad fact is Palin rises to the level of the water around her. The entire political class of America is mediocre at best, and often way less than that. Yet you guys like to single out Palin as a special kind of inept.

I have news for you. Obama ain't any better. He simply isn't. He hasn't shown me anything that says he's better than Palin when it comes to innovation and intelligence. He really seems like he is only along for the ride. He is not a leader. He goes with the flow. That's his legacy.

Oh wait. I forgot about killing bin Laden and the stock market. And Obamacare. And making the rich richer.

That's basically everything Obama stands for, right? A warmonger who is in bed with the banksters and whose goal is to make the rich richer.

Ummmm...nope...he was presented as a Nobel peace prize winner who will only help the poor and downtrodden rise up on a more equal level with the middle class and the rich. A Noble peace-prize winning genius who will restore the USA's standing in the world. But that hasn't happened. Far from it.

Obama continues the "killing machine" aspects first started under the Bush administration with his drone attacks and continuing the war in Afghanistan where SO MANY MORE US servicemen lost their lives and were injured, but that never attracted the glare of the media spotlight like it did under Bush.

And the poor haven't fared very well under Obama. Black poor even less so. Again, that rarely hits the media spotlight either.

Tell me how we're all so much better off with this "genius" as president, compared to someone of more modest intelligence. This "genius" president hasn't done anything "genius" that I can see. Can you?

^Obama is a war-mongering killing machine? But all I've read recently is that he's a big spineless pussy that the world laughs at. Which is it? :confused:

one can be both Dan

I am stubborn. It's unfortunate you think I'm "ridiculous"! You can "hate" Obama all you want. I find him intelligent and articulate. If "you guys" would spend more time working with him than against him things might actually get done.

You don't give the stump enough credit. Palin is a joke and for you to even pretend to back her .... :lol:

Don't make the mistake of confusing good leadership with intelligence.
The correlation between them is only moderate.
Quite likely Obama has a high IQ - probably much higher than Bush and Palin, though Bill Clinton, a Rhodes Scholar, would probably give him a run in the brains department.
The fact that Obama is intelligent is what makes him frightening, as he has glombed on to a philosophy which is somewhat at odds with the specific interests of making America the guiding light.
Instead, Obama sees himself as a philosopher king - a citizen of the world so to speak. He just happens to live in America and is fortunate enough to lead it.
His ideas, as latent in his speeches, always have been to make the world a better place. If that means a change in the fortunes of America and it's standing on the world stage - so be it. If that means a redistribution of wealth and a flattening of the economic pyramid - so be it as well. If that means not approving a pipeline that would bring thousands of jobs, in favor of a greener world - so be it. If that means attempting to reform the perception of America's role of policing the free world, so be it as well.

Unfortunately, Obama, while being very bright, could never be classified as being a "genius."
"Genius" - is more than having high intelligence.
It involves having the energy to carry forth one's visions of genius.
In that department he is lacking. He does not have the focussed laser like energy that is required to carry out his dreams. Hence, his 160 games of golf, the vacations, and all that. A genius, he is not.
And as a result it is not surprising that this very bright man is failing in so many areas of domestic and foreign affairs.

Throwing drone strikes around after paying bounties for info is easy to do. The infrastructure is in place and all it takes is a phone call. Btw, lots of talk that he isn't even involved in drone strikes. The CIA has Carte Blanche to do it for him.

If he was anything like a warmonger he would have hammered the hell out of Afghanistan and it would be our bitch by now.

He pulls the trigger only when it's politically safe and he can crow about it. Ho hum.....

Who here is backing her for anything? She is certainly not a joke in her current position as spokesperson and fund raiser for the GOP. She is certainly correct in pointing out that the emperor has no clothes. She is head and shoulders in competence in what she is doing compared to the feckless occupant of the Oval Office in what he is doing. And she is miles ahead of him in common sense and miles behind in ego.

If I was running a business and was going to hire a competent manager, Palin over Obama would be a no-brainer. She is nowhere near a serious consideration for president, but I'd bet she could do it better than Obama has.

PS I can't speak for others here, but I don't hate Obama. I hate what he is doing to my country and I hate the fact that he is president. I don't hate him any more than I hate a puppy that makes a mess on the carpet. The puppy doesn't know any better. Neither does Obama.

The point is not to let the shit he wants to get done ever get done.
Like the NSA spying on us. You in favor of that? You think we should help Obama do more of that? Substance, Jay...try addressing the substance of what CPAC talked about instead of cheap shots. You think we should help Obama target more conservative groups with the IRS? They do that in Canada?

With an A**** like Obama, you spend your time stopping him.

Yet another thread that had nothing to do with Obama taken over by the Obama on the Brain brigade :lol: :sleeping:

This reminds me - didn't you keep predicting Obama would not be re-elected until right before he was?

I do not like this Uncle Sam. I do not like his health care scam.
I do not like these dirty crooks, or how they lie and cook the books.
I do not like when Congress steals, I do not like their crony deals.
I do not like this spying, man, I do not like, 'Oh, Yes we can.'
I do not like this spending spree, we're smart, we know there's nothing free.
I do not like reporters' smug replies when I complain about their lies.
I do not like this kind of hope, and we won't take it, nope, nope, nope.


That is great, she finally found a worthy speechwriter.

Obama's legacy will be he empowered people to stay at home and write poetry, or whatever they wanted to do while they collected money for doing nothing.

The thread is about being incompetent.....so naturally, Obama came into it.

maybe she is trying to reach BO supporters. There is no worry of triple digit IQ there.

BO did prove that!

it's an auto-reflex for many at this point.

Much like his apologists?
Pretty hard to accept Sara is not qualified when you have a total incompetent in the WH. Obama don't deserve no rpsetc.

She could run circles around the former Speaker of the House - Nancy Pelosi.
In the world of Demwit idiots she's the front runner. Al Franken is pressing her though.

Seriously,When I see Pelosi on TV, I can only ask myself - who did you go to bed with to get your job??

This guy.........

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Pelosi

Deep pockets

Given those standards I would agree. Sarah is as qualified as most total incompetents.

Sarah Palin thought that Alaska's proximity to Russia made her a foreign policy expert

She thought there were death panels.

She had no clue as to what the Bush Doctrine is.

She could not name a Supreme Court decision she disagreed with. And it wasn't because she agreed with all of them.

She could not name one specific magazine or newspaper she reads.

She thought refudiate was a word, then compounded her dumbness by declaring she was as smart as Shakespeare because he made up words too. No Sarah, Will just used words that you still don't know.

She completely screwed up the details of Paul Revere's ride claiming that he rode to warn the British that the colonists were armed.

She suggested at the recent CPAC convention that a nuclear attack was a way to solve the Ukraine crisis.

She said this; "I haven't heard the president state that we're at war. That's why I too am not knowing -- do we use the term intervention? Do we use war? Do we use squirmish? What is it?" -
I have the same question. "Sarah, WTF is a squirmish?

She used the term "Blood libel" without being aware of how offensive it might by to some.

She thinks that the founding fathers based the Constitution on the bible and the Ten Commandments.

She thinks there is a Department of Law in the White House or maybe she means in the Executive branch.

Dumber than a tree stump? Stop insulting tree stumps.

She was right about Russia.
And she gets r-e-s-p-e-c-t.
And she talk without a teleprompter.
And she spies on no one.
And has never used the IRS for personal gains.
And she has never murdered anyone with a drone.

Your crap is trumped, son.
Run along now.

Well, the real question should be: who did Nancy Pelosi's mother sleep with?

The answer is 'Her father, of course.' ")

Pelosi's father was once the Mayor of Baltimore, Md., and a partisan Democratic insider and operator.

Hubby Paul is her money benefactor, granted, but Pelosi learned all her devious ways while in her chair at the dinner table as a young woman.