Snopes is on its last legs
 

Another fake "truth" site bites the dust, making it tougher on lefties. A scandal like Air America, and of course lack of popularity, takes it down.

http://stockboardasset.com/insights-...orts-gofundme/

:D They are following the Dhimmidrats right off the cliff. :D

How will mostpost cover their lies.:popcorn:

Maybe Mostie will contribute to the gofundme account - kinda like union dues for the less-informed....

Never happen... most liberals, such as mostpost, are pikers. They never spend their own money. They just want to spend other peoples money.

Come on. They can find a lot more than 710 wackadoodle liberals out there to help them. Can't they?

mostcheck says it is 4 pinocchios - if the operator used company funds for prostitutes, they were probably checking a claim. Don't they get money from the Clinton Foundation?

It was just a matter of time Pirate. The liberal media and all it's associates (snopes included) are finally being exposed.

Can you elaborate on your reasoning? Why is Snopes fake? Why does it favor lefties?

I remember when I found out about the site, I thought that this was a great idea. People doing real research to find the truth. Then I started reading what they actually wrote. Oh boy.

By taking the time to read what they write and their sources you discover the bias. So many of their "facts" are opinions. And their opinions unfailingly lean to the left.

Up to $475,000 as of now.

Quote from them on GoFundMe:
We had previously contracted with an outside vendor to provide certain services for Snopes.com. That contractual relationship ended earlier this year, but the vendor will not acknowledge the change in contractual status and continues to essentially hold the Snopes.com web site hostage. Although we maintain editorial control (for now), the vendor will not relinquish the site’s hosting to our control, so we cannot modify the site, develop it, or — most crucially — place advertising on it. The vendor continues to insert their own ads and has been withholding the advertising revenue from us.

do you think he was one of the postal workers that got paid by us tax payers for working for Hillary?:rant:

Huh, okay. Give me an example or two of what you're suggesting?

Also, all the other "fact checking" and "urban legend" sites do the same, right? Every one a left leaner and full of lies. Right?

Trust no one !

If I wanted to contribute to the less informed, I would send you money. Although that would be the completely uninformed.

You are the first person who should get my money for the totally and deliberately uniformed. That story was not about postal workers getting paid to work for Hillary. They were on unpaid leave. That means they do not get paid.

The problem was that it was seen that postal service management was favoring Clinton by letting them go. Of course that is wrong too.