Thursdays Selections- 7/12

[Solid_Gold]

BELMONT

1- 3 7 5 4

2- 1 3 6

3- 4 2 3

4- 1 7 5 11

5- 4 2 3 7

6- 2 5 1 6

7- 7 1a 6 5

8- 2 4 1 3

9- 12 3 10 9

[Solid_Gold]

CALDER

1- 1 3 5 7

2- 4 3 9 6

3- 2 4 7 5

4- 6 8 4 1

5- 6 10 5 1

6- 4 2 7 1

7- 5 3 6 9

8- 6 9 4 3

[Solid_Gold]

FINGER LAKES

1- 1 6 5 4

2- 10 7 4 3

3- 3 7 4 1

4- 8 1 9 11

5- 2 3 5 8

6- 4 3 5 6

7- 4 7 2 6

8- 7 6 1

9- 8 3 4 10

[Solid_Gold]

DELAWARE

1- 7 6 3 4

2- 1 2 3 5

3- 5 1 3 6

4- 6 1 4

5- 7 3 4 2

6- 7 9 8 6

7- 9 4 2 6

8- 1 2 3 7

9- 8 5 4 6

[Solid_Gold]

ARLINGTON

1- 3 1 5 4

2- 2 1 3 6

3- 1 7 3 4

4- 6 7 3 1

5- 1 5 4 6

6- 9 4 6 2

7- 2 4 3

8- 8 9 7 4

9- 2 10 5 7

[Solid_Gold]

WOODBINE

1- 3 6 2

2- 7 1a 2 3

3- 3 1a 6 7

4- 7 6 1 4

5- 4 8 5 3

6- 6 5 4 7

7- 2 4 7 1

8- 2 3 4 10

[Solid_Gold]

HOLLYWOOD

1- 6 5 2

2- 3 4 6

3- 4 7 2 1

4- 5 6 1 7

5- 7 3 5 4

6- 3 5 1 4

7- 6 3 7 1

8- 3 9 6 5

[Jay Trotter]

BELMONT

1- 3 7 5 4 Result 3-4-5
3 (0.90) No Bet
7 (6.60) Bet -$2.00
5 (4.70) Bet -$2.00
4 (3.50) No Bet

2- 1 3 6 Result 2-4-1
1 (2.20) No Bet
3 (2.35) No Bet
6 (27.50) Bet -$2.00

3- 4 2 3 Result 4-2-6
4 (1.05) No Bet
2 (7.50) Bet -$2.00
3 (10.40) Bet - $2.00

4- 1 7 5 11 Result 7-11-5
1 (20.60) Bet -$2.00
7 (0.90) No Bet
5 (7.50) Bet -$2.00
11 (4.20) Bet -$2.00


5- 4 2 3 7 Result 7-3-4
4 (3.95) No Bet
2 (3.35) No Bet
3 (2.80) No Bet
7 (3.40) No Bet


6- 2 5 1 6 Result 4-6-2
2 (12.20) Bet -$2.00
5 (10.40) Bet -$2.00
1 (5.00) Bet -$2.00
6 (23.20) Bet - $2.00

7- 7 1a 6 5 Result 1-1A-7
7 (1.50) No Bet
1a (1.70) No Bet
6 (5.80) Bet -$2.00
5 (3.65) No Bet

8- 2 4 1 3 Result 2-6-5
2 (6.80) Bet Return $15.60
4 (2.55) No Bet
1 (2.25) No Bet
3 (5.20) Bet -$2.00

9- 12 3 10 9 Result 10-12-2
12 (2.70) No Bet
3 (6.10) Bet -$2.00
10 (1.80) No Bet
9 (7.90) Bet -$2.00

TOTAL 17 BETS = $34.00 RETURN = $15.60 ROI = .458

Am I calculating this system correctly?

[Solid_Gold]

Thanks Jay, I appreciate the time and effort you put into that and I'm kind of honored that you chose to re-cap my selections.

However that was not correct. If I was checking another posters results I would not assume to know what they did or didn't actually play but would use a more generic/general approach. Because I didn't see their figs so I wouldn't know how deep each wager if any would go!

If I were to re-cap those same 9 races, I would say:

This guy had 3 winners on top and 8 of 9 finished ITM.
6 exactas boxed
4 trifectas boxed
2 supers boxed

Yes, my 4-1 rule applies to me. But not necessarily to all board readers!

JMO, thanks
SG

[Jay Trotter]

Thanks Jay, I appreciate the time and effort you put into that and I'm kind of honored that you chose to re-cap my selections.

However that was not correct. If I was checking another posters results I would not assume to know what they did or didn't actually play but would use a more generic/general approach. Because I didn't see their figs so I wouldn't know how deep each wager if any would go!

If I were to re-cap those same 9 races, I would say:

This guy had 3 winners on top and 8 of 9 finished ITM.
6 exactas boxed
4 trifectas boxed
2 supers boxed

Yes, my 4-1 rule applies to me. But not necessarily to all board readers!

JMO, thanks
SG
Wow! You must have had a really great day at Belmont!!!! So, you mentioned previously you would show your figs for a particular card. Please do for the Belmont card if you would be so kind.

[Solid_Gold]

No Jay, I said for a race or 2. Not an entire card. Way too much typing for my old ass.

Pick 2 races and I'll do them!

[Dahoss9698]

If I was checking another posters results I would not assume to know what they did or didn't actually play but would use a more generic/general approach. Because I didn't see their figs so I wouldn't know how deep each wager if any would go!



Isn't this sort of the point of the talks for the last week or so? Without any kind of explanation everyone does just have to assume.

[MaTH716]

Thanks Jay, I appreciate the time and effort you put into that and I'm kind of honored that you chose to re-cap my selections.

However that was not correct. If I was checking another posters results I would not assume to know what they did or didn't actually play but would use a more generic/general approach. Because I didn't see their figs so I wouldn't know how deep each wager if any would go!

If I were to re-cap those same 9 races, I would say:

This guy had 3 winners on top and 8 of 9 finished ITM.
6 exactas boxed
4 trifectas boxed
2 supers boxed

Yes, my 4-1 rule applies to me. But not necessarily to all board readers!

JMO, thanks
SG

But wouldn't that thinking lead people to assume that you box all plays in exacta's, triples and supers? That's not exactly the type of plays that people (talking about newbies) should be jumping head first into.


After it's all said and done based on $1 bets (only on exotics) boxing your picks.
Race 1) you hit the ex, tri, super -$7.15
Race 2) Miss -$12.00
Race 3) ex -$4.00
Race 4) ex, tri, super (nice job) +$161.80
Race 5) ex, tri +$27.90
Race 6) Miss -$60.00
Race 7) ex,tri -$12.60
Race 8) Miss -$60.00
Race 9) ex -$49.80

all that equates to -$15.85 (assuming all my math is right) on a day where you gave out
6 exactas boxed
4 trifectas boxed
2 supers boxed

IMO that's why giving out 3/4 horses each race without any sort of structure really amounts to nothing.

[Solid_Gold]

Isn't this sort of the point of the talks for the last week or so? Without any kind of explanation everyone does just have to assume.

OR one could assume that the first pick is the choice!

OR one could post their picks and leave others alone, just a thought???

[Solid_Gold]

But wouldn't that thinking lead people to assume that you box all plays in exacta's, triples and supers? That's not exactly the type of plays that people (talking about newbies) should be jumping head first into.


After it's all said and done based on $1 bets (only on exotics) boxing your picks.
Race 1) you hit the ex, tri, super -$7.15
Race 2) Miss -$12.00
Race 3) ex -$4.00
Race 4) ex, tri, super (nice job) +$161.80
Race 5) ex, tri +$27.90
Race 6) Miss -$60.00
Race 7) ex,tri -$12.60
Race 8) Miss -$60.00
Race 9) ex -$49.80

all that equates to -$15.85 (assuming all my math is right) on a day where you gave out
6 exactas boxed
4 trifectas boxed
2 supers boxed

IMO that's why giving out 3/4 horses each race without any sort of structure really amounts to nothing.

If you can't make a profit of 4-1 then I pass. Just stating the results is all.

I never tell you what to bet!

[Dahoss9698]

OR one could assume that the first pick is the choice!

OR one could post their picks and leave others alone, just a thought???

OR you could grow a set and stop patting yourself on the back when you provide NOTHING that is useful to anyone.

if you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen little man.

[Solid_Gold]

LMAO

[Jay Trotter]

Thanks Jay, I appreciate the time and effort you put into that and I'm kind of honored that you chose to re-cap my selections.

However that was not correct. If I was checking another posters results I would not assume to know what they did or didn't actually play but would use a more generic/general approach. Because I didn't see their figs so I wouldn't know how deep each wager if any would go!

If I were to re-cap those same 9 races, I would say:

This guy had 3 winners on top and 8 of 9 finished ITM.
6 exactas boxed
4 trifectas boxed
2 supers boxed

Yes, my 4-1 rule applies to me. But not necessarily to all board readers!

JMO, thanks
SGWell, if you made that many great plays and a profit to boot based on the Belmont selections then I'm a Monkey's Uncle! Nothing to see here -- just another Ultimate Selector. Move along, move along! Have at it then.

[Solid_Gold]

Well Jay, you posted the results not me!

[Jay Trotter]

Well Jay, you posted the results not me!Yes, and the results show:
TOTAL 17 BETS = $34.00 WAGERED = $15.60 RETURN

But somehow you're claiming some massive winning day! :lol:

[Solid_Gold]

Yes, and the results show:
TOTAL 17 BETS = $34.00 WAGERED = $15.60 RETURN

But somehow you're claiming some massive winning day! :lol:

Jay, the results you posted are bogus and you know it. Otherwise, you wouldn't have posted them. You based them on playing EVERY 4-1 shot I picked. No one plays like that. Most people are not that stupid??? Are you?

[Jay Trotter]

Jay, the results you posted are bogus and you know it. Otherwise, you wouldn't have posted them. You based them on playing EVERY 4-1 shot I picked. No one plays like that. Most people are not that stupid??? Are you?I must be stupid. I thought you stated you play them if they're 4/1 or better. Explain it to me slowly how you made money on this card based on your posted selections, the odds and the subsequent results.

[Solid_Gold]

I must be stupid. I thought you stated you play them if they're 4/1 or better. Explain it to me slowly how you made money on this card based on your posted selections, the odds and the subsequent results.

Dude, no ONE plays every friggin horse! My selections DID make money yesterday and most other days! I also said without my figs that you'd have no clue! Selective hearing/reading is not an asset.

You seem kind of arrogant for someone that only plays in free contests that you run and score? Maybe post a race a race or two in the open forum?

[Solid_Gold]

Christ, I even offered to post my figs for a race or two of your choice even today and you people continue to try to bust balls.

I'm not leaving here until you arrogant pricks ban me so have at it.

[Dahoss9698]

Dude, no ONE plays every friggin horse! My selections DID make money yesterday and most other days! I also said without my figs that you'd have no clue! Selective hearing/reading is not an asset.

You seem kind of arrogant for someone that only plays in free contests that you run and score? Maybe post a race a race or two in the open forum?

So what you are saying is the picks with no figs are totally useless. Glad we cleared that up.

Sort of begs the question....why post them then?

[Solid_Gold]

So what you are saying is the picks with no figs are totally useless. Glad we cleared that up.

Sort of begs the question....why post them then?


Just go from first to worst, even you should understand that part????

[Jay Trotter]

Dude, no ONE plays every friggin horse! Please don't call me Dude!

I also said without my figs that you'd have no clue! Selective hearing/reading is not an asset.As previously stated, why post them then?

You seem kind of arrogant for someone that only plays in free contests that you run and score?Arrogant, really? The only reason I even wandered over to your little world here is because you called "my little contest" lame and insinuated it was not a worthwhile endevour! So, who's the arrogant one?

Those "little" contests happen to offer over $16,000 in cash & merchandise. What have you contributed to this site other than posting random numbers?

Christ, I even offered to post my figs for a race or two of your choice even today and you people continue to try to bust balls.I asked you to post the Belmont card figs -- so then pick a couple races.

I'm not leaving here until you arrogant pricks ban me so have at it.That's unfortunate.

[Solid_Gold]

Pick which 2 you want to see, then! Or I can do another track at your request since I already posted my track for today.

Your choice not mine!

Hell, anyone pick a race then?

[MaTH716]

Pick which 2 you want to see, then! Or I can do another track at your request since I already posted my track for today.

Your choice not mine!

Hell, anyone pick a race then?

I would like to see. Monmouth 7th (there's 16 MTP)

[Jay Trotter]

Pick which 2 you want to see, then! Or I can do another track at your request since I already posted my track for today.

Your choice not mine!

Hell, anyone pick a race then?Belmont 4 & 6

[Beachbabe]

Belmont 4 & 6


The wait is killing me !

[Solid_Gold]

Belmont 4

1- na
2- 49
3- 19
4- 40
5- 25
6- 39
7- na
8- 36
9- scr
10- 25

I would not bet this race since the 2 has a 9+ pt. edge over the rest of the field and is 7-5 M/L. But there may be some value using the 4-6-8 underneath?

[Solid_Gold]

Race 6

1- 118
2- 76
3- 106
4- 40
5- 100
6- 100
7- 86
8- 101

With these numbers looks like #1 is a solid play with 3 5 6 8 under if the value is there. But I think the #1 goes off too low and negates any value?

[Solid_Gold]

The wait is killing me !

The wait is over

[Solid_Gold]

2 tough mds. Jay which I wouldn't normally play but I'll place some sheckles on these for shits and giggles!

[Solid_Gold]

Let me know how it turns out. Wife says get the hell off this thing.

[Robert Fischer]

Yes, my 4-1 rule applies to me. But not necessarily to all board readers!


ROFL what a bullshitter!

never promote your "picks" again :D

[Beachbabe]

My system says:

Belmont--race 4--- :1: & :6:
Belmont --race 6--- :7: & :8: