PDA

View Full Version : Betting snafu,Turf Paradise,California, investigation


rwwupl
03-01-2011, 06:18 PM
From CHRB ,Information officer Mike Marten...


The California Horse Racing Board has completed its review of the totalizator/communications error involving the first race at Turf Paradise on January 26, 2011, which resulted in a failure to merge California pools with the host track and, conversely, the inability of California wagering locations to receive the stop-betting command from Turf Paradise. As a result, wagering continued at racetracks and simulcast facilities in California for slightly more than five minutes after the start of this race. The CHRB determined the problem was due to an error by an operator or operators at the Quantum Data Center (QDC) in Sacramento. While this error was regrettable and not condoned, the CHRB was encouraged to find that long-standing security measures were followed that prevented anyone from benefitting illegally from the error. All legitimate winning tickets were paid, while all wagers made after the start of the race were refunded. Sportech, which provides totalizator services for California, cooperated fully in the CHRB’s review and has assured the Board that additional steps are being taken to prevent this type of error in the future.
In greater detail: Early each morning when California conducts live or simulcast wagering, an operator at the Sacramento QDC enters the racing cards/program information into the totalizator system for all races on which wagers will be accepted in California on that day. The operator also begins the process of linking totalizator systems by opening the California end of the Inter-Tote System Protocol (ITSP) links with host tracks. Sportech advised the Board that this procedure was correctly followed and the operator opened the California link to Turf Paradise. However, the next step was not taken: The ITSP link was not opened for California on the host system for Turf Paradise. Therefore, even though bettors at California racetracks and simulcast facilities (i.e. brick-and-mortar locations) were wagering throughout the morning on the first race at Turf Paradise, those stored wagers were not transferred and commingled with the host track. And because there was no link, the stop-betting command sent out by Turf Paradise was not received in California. This did not affect Advance Deposit Wagers because those account wagers are linked separately. And because the California wagers were not merged with the host track, the integrity of the Turf Paradise pools was not compromised.
The stop-betting command was issued by Turf Paradise at 11:32:34. The issue in California was identified and the California pools were closed at 11:37:45, or 5 minutes and 11 seconds after the start of the race. Under security procedures established years ago by the CHRB, as soon as the error was identified, the pools on the race were immediately locked but California did not enable cashing on the race. Instead, Sportech personnel contacted pari-mutuel managers at California racetracks, who in turn contacted a California steward for consultation. Again following the established security procedures, they agreed on a course of action:
• They contacted managers at all California racetracks and simulcast facilities to alert them to the problem and to ask them to inform their customers about the delay in cashing for the first race at Turf Paradise.
• They ran a log of all wagers, which totaled $3,896.
• They identified all wagers that were placed after 11:32:34. There were 86 such wagers, which totaled $473. Of those, 81 were ticket/voucher-based and five were placed through on-track accounts. (On-track accounts differ from ADW wagers in that the accounts are maintained by the racetrack and wagers can only be placed at a brick-and-mortar facility.)
• Before turning on cashing for this race, they locked out the 86 wagers made after the start of the race. They agreed to refund these wagers.
• They manually inputted the correct pari-mutuel prices for the race based on the payoffs posted by Turf Paradise.
• Sportech agreed to pay all legitimate winning tickets.
• After taking all of these steps, California turned on cashing for the first race at Turf Paradise approximately two hours after the race.
The CHRB determined that by taking all of these steps, those involved followed correct security procedures to control the extent of the error and prevented anyone from gaining an unfair advantage. The Board sought and received assurances from Sportech that they had reviewed all ITSP procedures with their personnel and that Sportech will continue to emphasize the importance of these procedures with their operations staff.
Regarding Sportech: In 2007, Scientific Games Racing, LLC (succeeded by Sportech Racing, LLC), executed a single totalizator contract with all licensed racing/wagering entities in California, with each such entity as a signatory to the agreement, including SCOTWINC, NOTWINC, Bay Meadows, Hollywood Park, Golden Gate Fields, Santa Anita Park, Los Alamitos, CARF, Fairplex Park, Cal Expo, and Del Mar. Sportech ultimately reports to the presidents and general managers of each organization, as well as the respective pari-mutuel managers, and also reports significant matters to the CHRB.

InTheRiver68
03-01-2011, 11:58 PM
This is (on the face of it) exactly as it should be, and they should be commended for taking the correct action.

The only thing that wasn't really specified was, did California in essence "book" the wagers, and then pass the excess cost of the payouts to the tote company? Or did Sportech have to swallow the whole load, as it were?

Broken down a bit:

Of the wagers at California racetracks and simulcast facilities that were placed before the actual off-time of the Turf Paradise race, did California take their commission? Did they use the net pools to pay for the winning wagers (booking the race), and then charge the tote company for any winning wagers that they did not have the funds to pay for? Or did they just keep the whole $3,423 (the legitimate pre-off-time wagers) and make Sportech pay the winning tickets, not using any of the wagered money to pay off winning tickets?

And did California pay Turf Paradise their signal fee on the $3,423?

These may seem like piddly questions, but the legitimacy of the actions taken by the California mutuels department and stewards depends on the answers. In a perfect world, California would have treated the $3,423 *exactly* like it had been wagered correctly, paying a signal fee, dividing the commission on those wagers as mandated by California law, and paying out the return-to-bettors portion to, well, the bettors. The only money Sportech should be out is winning wagers that the net pools didn't cover.

Curious minds want to know!

-InTheRiver68

lamboguy
03-02-2011, 08:05 AM
this is the first time that i have seen a track admit that after the bell betting exists.

my main beef is that i believe it is predominant in blind pools, superfecta's and trifecta's and more than likely daily double pools. i know what payoffs should roughly be on trifectas and superfectas and the current payoffs are nowhere near what they should be. i certainly wish that hana would take up this matte on a national level. they are now behind a player strike because of takeout, this after the bell wagering (stealing) cost more money to legitamate players and horsemen than takeout increases.

DJofSD
03-02-2011, 09:25 AM
Roger, thanks for posting this.

On the surface, it appears a good faith effort was made. It both covered the behind of the various responsible parties and provided some relief for the wagering public.

There was a contingency plan. It was followed and the desired outcome was achieved. The plan needs to be reviewed to see if there is any area for improvement. One area they might look at is being able to more quickly recognize when the situation occurs.

rwwupl
03-02-2011, 09:55 AM
California racing has been taken to task on many things,and most has been deserved.

Yes ,I have been a critic and remain so on the many issues that need resolution.

We have to remember that California is a very large state, and still plays a big roll in U.S. racing, and there are many people there wanting to do the right thing, including many at the CHRB.

Mike Marten is the Information Officer for the CHRB and has a long record for doing the right thing, and he would be among the first to invite your further questions on this or any other matter in California racing.

I think credit should be given when credit is due, thanks ,Mike.

MikeM@chrb.ca.gov

Roger Way

andymays
03-02-2011, 11:28 AM
California racing has been taken to task on many things,and most has been deserved.

Yes ,I have been a critic and remain so on the many issues that need resolution.

We have to remember that California is a very large state, and still plays a big roll in U.S. racing, and there are many people there wanting to do the right thing, including many at the CHRB.

Mike Marten is the Information Officer for the CHRB and has a long record for doing the right thing, and he would be among the first to invite your further questions on this or any other matter in California racing.

I think credit should be given when credit is due, thanks ,Mike.

MikeM@chrb.ca.gov

Roger Way

Absolutely! Mike Marten is a good guy with a tough job. :ThmbUp:

andymays
03-02-2011, 11:34 AM
Calif. Report Cites Cause of Wagering Snafu | BloodHorse.com

http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/61653/calif-report-cites-cause-of-wagering-snafu

DJofSD
03-02-2011, 11:54 AM
Absolutely! Mike Marten is a good guy with a tough job. :ThmbUp:
I hope Mike can feel the love.

Stillriledup
03-02-2011, 03:31 PM
Mike is a pro no doubt. If you e mail him , he will make sure you get a proper and timely response.