pmd62ndst
08-21-2003, 05:16 PM
My best friend occasionally comes out to the track with me but to call him a horseplayer is truly stretching it. He goes because he loves the atmosphere and tends to be very chatty with others while my nose is buried in the Racing Form. He is able to socialize because he picks horses rather quickly using his unorthodox handicapping method which involves picking a horse based on the NAME alone.
Now, he doesn't pick all horses that are named FAST, GOOD or WIN. In fact, he looks for horses that have negative connotations, like SLOW or BAD or LOSE, reasoning that many horseplayers may ignore these horses >subliminally< and would be underbet.
I told him he was crazy. He told me to run some numbers on my "computer do-hicky thing" and we wagered a nice dinner.
The following is a result of the study, based on a Horse's Name that contain a certain word. The results are rather mind-blowing:
ROI (%) Wins/Entries (%) ($/Win) Avg Odds
Win: $ - 830.20 (-15%) 382/2819 (13.6%) (12.59) 4.32
Lose: $ + 39.20 (+22%) 12/89 (13.5%) (18.10) 4.94
First: $ - 674.60 (-34%) 113/999 (11.3%) (11.71) 4.88
Last: $ - 212.50 (-16%) 78/656 (11.9%) (14.10) 5.47
Good: $ - 471.10 (-30%) 94/797 (11.8%) (11.95) 4.75
Bad: $ - 133.70 (-13%) 62/509 (12.2%) (14.26) 5.20
Fast: $ - 464.80 (-31%) 82/740 (11.1%) (12.38) 5.20
Slow: $ - 32.60 (-37%) 4/45 ( 8.9%) (14.35) 5.03
* Enough "Slow" races?
"Lose" produces a positive ROI! Notice that the ROI %, $/Wins and Avg Odds are higher for the "negative" words while the win % remains relatively the same.
Important to note that the database was looking for the phrase in the entire name because a phrase is often times embedded in a name. For example, the word "bad" would include a horse named Onebadhorse along with something completely irrelevant like Borabadura.
This study includes all Thoroughbred races from 2/1/2003 to today at all tracks offered by DRF.
I owe my buddy dinner but is this truly an "angle"?
PMD
Now, he doesn't pick all horses that are named FAST, GOOD or WIN. In fact, he looks for horses that have negative connotations, like SLOW or BAD or LOSE, reasoning that many horseplayers may ignore these horses >subliminally< and would be underbet.
I told him he was crazy. He told me to run some numbers on my "computer do-hicky thing" and we wagered a nice dinner.
The following is a result of the study, based on a Horse's Name that contain a certain word. The results are rather mind-blowing:
ROI (%) Wins/Entries (%) ($/Win) Avg Odds
Win: $ - 830.20 (-15%) 382/2819 (13.6%) (12.59) 4.32
Lose: $ + 39.20 (+22%) 12/89 (13.5%) (18.10) 4.94
First: $ - 674.60 (-34%) 113/999 (11.3%) (11.71) 4.88
Last: $ - 212.50 (-16%) 78/656 (11.9%) (14.10) 5.47
Good: $ - 471.10 (-30%) 94/797 (11.8%) (11.95) 4.75
Bad: $ - 133.70 (-13%) 62/509 (12.2%) (14.26) 5.20
Fast: $ - 464.80 (-31%) 82/740 (11.1%) (12.38) 5.20
Slow: $ - 32.60 (-37%) 4/45 ( 8.9%) (14.35) 5.03
* Enough "Slow" races?
"Lose" produces a positive ROI! Notice that the ROI %, $/Wins and Avg Odds are higher for the "negative" words while the win % remains relatively the same.
Important to note that the database was looking for the phrase in the entire name because a phrase is often times embedded in a name. For example, the word "bad" would include a horse named Onebadhorse along with something completely irrelevant like Borabadura.
This study includes all Thoroughbred races from 2/1/2003 to today at all tracks offered by DRF.
I owe my buddy dinner but is this truly an "angle"?
PMD