ceejay
09-01-2001, 12:37 PM
In todays DRF column (subscriber only) Steve Crist suggests 50-cent bets for pick threes and fours, trifectas, and superfectas. He reckons that handle will increase because putting together a viable ticket often requires the $20/race-$100/day player player to pass his/her choke point so they pass the wager and make a small win or exacta bet.
I like the idea myself. Thinking back to powerball mania last week, this would let casual players use the Superfecta and Pick fours like lottery bets. Why stop with P4's: why not P6's. I think that marketing racetrack wagers to "lottery players" will increase handle more than the supply side-based reduced takes.
I recently read (one of Mark Cramer's columns) of the national interest in the weekly "quince" (or quintfecta as I would call it) bet in France. They take a large field (16 or so) and sell tickets for the top five finishers in order with consolation payouts for out of order tickets. In a 16 horse field random picks would give about a 1 in 525000 likelihood. Like a lottery and very popular.
I like the idea myself. Thinking back to powerball mania last week, this would let casual players use the Superfecta and Pick fours like lottery bets. Why stop with P4's: why not P6's. I think that marketing racetrack wagers to "lottery players" will increase handle more than the supply side-based reduced takes.
I recently read (one of Mark Cramer's columns) of the national interest in the weekly "quince" (or quintfecta as I would call it) bet in France. They take a large field (16 or so) and sell tickets for the top five finishers in order with consolation payouts for out of order tickets. In a 16 horse field random picks would give about a 1 in 525000 likelihood. Like a lottery and very popular.