PDA

View Full Version : Field size matters?


EdgeProSheets
07-17-2010, 12:13 PM
Would like a general idea how everybody stands on field sizes. what is your preferred field size???

1) 6 or less
2) 7
3) 8
4) 9
5)10
6) more than ten

GaryG
07-17-2010, 12:17 PM
Normally I prefer full fields, but you can get overlays in small fields as well. And you are less likely to be elimated by trouble.

joanied
07-17-2010, 12:26 PM
At least 8 and not more than 14 (16 for the Kentucky Derby)

shots
07-17-2010, 01:20 PM
Full fields on the turf :)

kenwoodall2
07-17-2010, 01:32 PM
I prefer 6 or less in dirt sprints unless too competitive; full fields on turf; around 8 for dirt routes and AW.

jelly
07-17-2010, 02:59 PM
9-14

Johnny V
07-17-2010, 03:10 PM
I prefer at least 8.

thespaah
07-17-2010, 03:19 PM
Would like a general idea how everybody stands on field sizes. what is your preferred field size???

1) 6 or less
2) 7
3) 8
4) 9
5)10
6) more than ten
At least 8 betting interests.....

thaskalos
07-17-2010, 03:46 PM
8-10.

therussmeister
07-17-2010, 06:16 PM
My stats show I do best with 9 betting interests.

Hanover1
07-17-2010, 06:30 PM
Interesting question. As a horseman, I like smaller fields, if I declare. As a bettor, I like the larger fields, ideally 10 or more. Gives me a chance to explore PPs for value vs having to beat a heavy chalk in short field for value vs risk.

Mike_412
07-17-2010, 07:36 PM
Give me a 10-12 horse field, a cold beer, and I'm a happy young man.

Trotman
07-17-2010, 07:41 PM
Min 8 for dirt,turf,or rubber

Robert Goren
07-17-2010, 07:52 PM
The ideal field size is 12. It makes all the pools work. It keeps the pace honest. It covers up a multitude of sins. It does not however make up for a 18% takeout.