dav4463
07-28-2003, 03:29 PM
I've been playing around with this general idea today and caught winners at Philadelphia of $55, $45, and $13......probably just lucky, but wondering if it has any merit. There are still some races left today. Race 8 and 9 had no surviving horses. Race 10 has the 1, 10, and 11 as contenders. 1 is 12-1 M/L and 11 is 10-1M/L, so hopefully another big longshot is on the way.
What I do, is eliminate the two best Beyer horses....overall and recent....and also eliminate the two worst
Then, I eliminate the three best early speed horses and the two worst early speed horses.
It leaves a handful of contenders, usually 1 to 3 per race, sometimes none, that are going off usually at over 4-1.
Is there a chance that this style of play can isolate some price horses? You still have to handicap between the survivors, but the temptation of the top figure horses and top early speed horses is gone while also getting rid of the worst horses. Most of the longshots I have seen are horses who aren't the best on paper, but they aren't hopelessly bad either.
What I do, is eliminate the two best Beyer horses....overall and recent....and also eliminate the two worst
Then, I eliminate the three best early speed horses and the two worst early speed horses.
It leaves a handful of contenders, usually 1 to 3 per race, sometimes none, that are going off usually at over 4-1.
Is there a chance that this style of play can isolate some price horses? You still have to handicap between the survivors, but the temptation of the top figure horses and top early speed horses is gone while also getting rid of the worst horses. Most of the longshots I have seen are horses who aren't the best on paper, but they aren't hopelessly bad either.