boxcar
05-20-2010, 12:28 AM
Here are BO's opening remarks:
Obama said that in his meeting with Calderone, "We also discussed the new law in Arizona, which is a misdirected effort -- a misdirected expression of frustration over our broken immigration system, and which has raised concerns in both our countries. Today, I want every American to know my administration has devoted unprecedented resources in personnel and technology to securing our border. Illegal immigration is down, not up, and we will continue to do what's necessary to secure our shared border.
And I want everyone, American and Mexican, to know my administration is taking a very close look at the Arizona law. We're examining any implications, especially for civil rights. Because in the United States of America, no law-abiding person -- be they an American citizen, a legal immigrant, or a visitor or tourist from Mexico -- should ever be subject to suspicion simply because of what they look like."
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2010/05/obama_with_calderon_again_blas.html
What I would like to ask all you BO-supporting libs out there is this: Who is the Moron-in-Chief referring to in this statment:
Because in the United States of America, no law-abiding person -- be they an American citizen, a legal immigrant, or a visitor or tourist from Mexico --
should ever be subject to suspicion simply because of what they look like."
I need some of you libs to enlighten me; for truly I am missing something critically important in the above statement. If BO is referring to a "law abiding person" strictly as those he mentions later, i.e. Americans, visitors, tourists, or legal immigrants, what is all the flap over about this Arizona law? Is this Arizona law targeting Americans, visitors, tourists or legal immigrants?
If not, why are libs so up in arms over this Arizona law, since the law is only targeting "law abiding" persons? But if the law isn't targeting these kinds of persons, then BO's statement is nothing but a red herring, isn't it? It's designed to detract from the real issue of people who are here in the U.S. ILLEGALLY, isn't it?
Or another possible explanation is that in BO's world there is no such thing as an illegal alien. Everyone in this country -- with or without documents -- with or without papers -- he considers to be merely "visitors" or "tourists". But...if there's no such animal as an illegal alien, why are there federal statutes on the books that regulate immigration and establish immigration policies? How come I haven't heard mention of repeal of all federal immigration laws?
Or...maybe someone out there can explain to me how an illegal alien, whose very presence on U.S. soil is in violation of federal laws, can also be a law-abiding person? How does that work, exactly?
Libs, this is YOUR Moron-in-Chief who you dearly love. (Remember: he's not mine because he disenfranchised this white guy recently.) This is your fuhrer (well, at least Woody Allen's and I'm sure others' as well). This is supposedly one of the brightest geniuses on our planet (so some have billed BO), so it should be easy for you libs to explain his statements, which to me seem a wee bit irrational and illogical. So, I'm looking for someone to lead me down the path of light -- perhaps some empty cup bearer? :rolleyes:
Boxcar
Obama said that in his meeting with Calderone, "We also discussed the new law in Arizona, which is a misdirected effort -- a misdirected expression of frustration over our broken immigration system, and which has raised concerns in both our countries. Today, I want every American to know my administration has devoted unprecedented resources in personnel and technology to securing our border. Illegal immigration is down, not up, and we will continue to do what's necessary to secure our shared border.
And I want everyone, American and Mexican, to know my administration is taking a very close look at the Arizona law. We're examining any implications, especially for civil rights. Because in the United States of America, no law-abiding person -- be they an American citizen, a legal immigrant, or a visitor or tourist from Mexico -- should ever be subject to suspicion simply because of what they look like."
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2010/05/obama_with_calderon_again_blas.html
What I would like to ask all you BO-supporting libs out there is this: Who is the Moron-in-Chief referring to in this statment:
Because in the United States of America, no law-abiding person -- be they an American citizen, a legal immigrant, or a visitor or tourist from Mexico --
should ever be subject to suspicion simply because of what they look like."
I need some of you libs to enlighten me; for truly I am missing something critically important in the above statement. If BO is referring to a "law abiding person" strictly as those he mentions later, i.e. Americans, visitors, tourists, or legal immigrants, what is all the flap over about this Arizona law? Is this Arizona law targeting Americans, visitors, tourists or legal immigrants?
If not, why are libs so up in arms over this Arizona law, since the law is only targeting "law abiding" persons? But if the law isn't targeting these kinds of persons, then BO's statement is nothing but a red herring, isn't it? It's designed to detract from the real issue of people who are here in the U.S. ILLEGALLY, isn't it?
Or another possible explanation is that in BO's world there is no such thing as an illegal alien. Everyone in this country -- with or without documents -- with or without papers -- he considers to be merely "visitors" or "tourists". But...if there's no such animal as an illegal alien, why are there federal statutes on the books that regulate immigration and establish immigration policies? How come I haven't heard mention of repeal of all federal immigration laws?
Or...maybe someone out there can explain to me how an illegal alien, whose very presence on U.S. soil is in violation of federal laws, can also be a law-abiding person? How does that work, exactly?
Libs, this is YOUR Moron-in-Chief who you dearly love. (Remember: he's not mine because he disenfranchised this white guy recently.) This is your fuhrer (well, at least Woody Allen's and I'm sure others' as well). This is supposedly one of the brightest geniuses on our planet (so some have billed BO), so it should be easy for you libs to explain his statements, which to me seem a wee bit irrational and illogical. So, I'm looking for someone to lead me down the path of light -- perhaps some empty cup bearer? :rolleyes:
Boxcar