Track Collector
04-01-2010, 02:58 AM
I will soon have opportunity to take advantage of Conditional Wagering at one of the ADWs I do business with.
It should reason that the closer to the race off time a conditional wager evaluation is made, the more accurate its' approximation of the final off odds will be. That said, there are through practical experience, a point where a qualifying conditional wager gets submitted almost 100% of the time, as well as a point in time where a significant number (perhaps 5-10% of the time), the race goes off before the condition can be evaluated.
For those who use Conditional Wagering regularly, what are your experiences? Do you find that using Post Time minus 30 seconds safely gets your qualifying conditional wager in almost 100% of the time, or what about Post Time minus 60 seconds or Post time minus 90 seconds? Also, do you find any particular tracks that fall outside the norm?
Thanks for any help!
It should reason that the closer to the race off time a conditional wager evaluation is made, the more accurate its' approximation of the final off odds will be. That said, there are through practical experience, a point where a qualifying conditional wager gets submitted almost 100% of the time, as well as a point in time where a significant number (perhaps 5-10% of the time), the race goes off before the condition can be evaluated.
For those who use Conditional Wagering regularly, what are your experiences? Do you find that using Post Time minus 30 seconds safely gets your qualifying conditional wager in almost 100% of the time, or what about Post Time minus 60 seconds or Post time minus 90 seconds? Also, do you find any particular tracks that fall outside the norm?
Thanks for any help!