PDA

View Full Version : 5th Race today 2/20/10 AQU.


ezpace
02-20-2010, 07:47 PM
Race should of been called the Tijuana Golden middle finger race. lol

I wonder if the Hollywood Park boys were there , their marks were

all over it.. snakeskin boots an thick GOLD rope chain necks.

I DID NOT gamble on the race but you

can put that poster right beside "thecall" poster

in the 1985 WORLD SERIES.

Classic , slow the race down guyz. ,,unchallenged leader

and stay out of the way of that horse that is supposed to

run second.. and guyz make it look real good... LOL

This racing is so goofy anymore it is now slapstick comedy.

PaceAdvantage
02-20-2010, 11:44 PM
I DID NOT gamble on the race Are you sure about this? Sounds like you might have...

ezpace
02-20-2010, 11:51 PM
Are you sure about this? Sounds like you might have...

888888888888888888888888888888888

I didn't play any AQU RACES TODAY= ZERO

I do a lot of watching and TAKIING NOTES. This one is

so obvious it's unbelivable to some.. I also am going

to send the video to those that can do something about it.

Record all conversations and expect absolutely nothing but a little lip service,,

but their will be a day coming.. ZZZzz time ..

PaceAdvantage
02-21-2010, 12:14 AM
Is there anyone else out there that can possibly add a bit of reality here? I'm going to watch the race later (I planned on it anyway).

I believe ezpace thinks every race needs to go exactly as he expects it to, or else the fix was so OBVIOUSLY in...

Exotic1
02-21-2010, 08:25 AM
The # 2 was bet off the board but he was the only speed in the race - sprinter stretching out and rail and speed were golden yesterday. Place and show horses sat the rail. The # 7 was a comedy act. Jara tried to rush his mount out of the gate but since the horse had no tactical speed he got caught 5 wide for the first half of the race and had no chance after that. Visually, the only horse that beat the bias yesterday was the #4 in the 3rd but had no chance of winning under the prevailing track conditions. IMHO.

Charlie D
02-21-2010, 09:35 AM
Aqu 2-20-10 Spot plays



Race 5
:2: if he can get the distance



If a few people took a similar view to Justralph the gamble will probably be on.

ezpace
02-21-2010, 01:01 PM
Is there anyone else out there that can possibly add a bit of reality here? I'm going to watch the race later (I planned on it anyway).

I believe ezpace thinks every race needs to go exactly as he expects it to, or else the fix was so OBVIOUSLY in...

*************************
REAL ignorant statement...PA

When have i ever singled out a race before PA in the years

I"ve been posting.... N E V E R...

and you started refuting the claim before even

seeing the race... says it all. watch it 30 times like i did..

end of discussion... for me it goes on weekly major or minor

tracks.

ezpace
02-21-2010, 01:06 PM
THAT"S the REALITY PA and most are to ignorant to know it

if it happened in front of their noses.

acorn54
02-21-2010, 02:42 PM
seemed like a logical choice if early speed could hold up.
i saw nothing fishy about the race.

PaceAdvantage
02-21-2010, 04:45 PM
*************************
REAL ignorant statement...PA

When have i ever singled out a race before PA in the years

I"ve been posting.... N E V E R...

and you started refuting the claim before even

seeing the race... says it all. watch it 30 times like i did..

end of discussion... for me it goes on weekly major or minor

tracks.I saw the race live...planned on watching it again on the replay show I tape every night.

I saw nothing that alarmed me, but I only have 23 years watching races...that's why I posted what I did...

I get the feeling you aren't going to get too many people agreeing with you.

Figman
02-21-2010, 05:01 PM
This is how I had the Saturday fifth race at AQU graded:
#2 EARLY RESPONSE - a 67 off 10/26 FL
#1 DAVY BANK - a 66 off 2/4 AQU
#7 TOP LEADER - a 65 off 1/31 AQU
#5 MEL'S GOLD - a 62 off 12/31 AQU
#3 JUSTIN P - a 60 3/4 off 10/4 at BEL
The rest of the race was graded at below 60.
And NO I didn't play EARLY RESPONSE.

ezpace
02-22-2010, 10:51 AM
I saw the race live...planned on watching it again on the replay show I tape every night.

I saw nothing that alarmed me, but I only have 23 years watching races...that's why I posted what I did...

I get the feeling you aren't going to get too many people agreeing with you.
**********************
Like i said end of discussion for me. It's so obvious

i am talking with someone who has total recall after viewing

a race onetime even the next day and knows exatly the opinions

of most here before they are posted..away from the elite.an back to the humble reality

of every day type people. ; )

PaceAdvantage
02-23-2010, 12:41 AM
If you feel this strongly, I suggest you file a complaint with the proper authorities, and try and get someone in the racing media to take on your cause.

Every newsman loves a good scandal. If your theory has legs, it will take off...

Let us know how it goes.

the little guy
02-23-2010, 11:58 AM
The horse was lone speed, with an inside post, on a track that clearly had a huge rail bias, in a very weak field.

I bet him. Didn't seem like rocket science.

Robert Goren
02-23-2010, 12:07 PM
So what else is new, I learned a long time ago strange things happen when there appears only one front runner.

Light
02-23-2010, 12:38 PM
This is how I had the Saturday fifth race at AQU graded:
#2 EARLY RESPONSE - a 67 off 10/26 FL


That was the whole key to this horse. You had to go 4 back like the Figman and choose that pl which was the right one. The 2nd and 3rd races back were above this horse's level and the horse needed its last race. Also being a claiming "B" race,the horse got a break with the conditions. Its basically a NW3L for older horses except for 4yo's who don't have a limit on how many races they've won already. Everyone in the field including the 4yo's had only won 2 races lifetime except the winner. He had already won 6 at only 4yo. Now 7.

JustRalph
02-23-2010, 09:38 PM
The horse was lone speed, with an inside post, on a track that clearly had a huge rail bias, in a very weak field.

I bet him. Didn't seem like rocket science.

I played him too..........after posting it in the selections forum earlier in the morning I thought he was golden after watching what was happening in the first few races.............no rocket science here

ezpace
02-25-2010, 09:37 PM
It wasn'[t about a lone speed horse

win bet it was about the ex, tri etc.

and as i said earlier PA i notified all.