HANA Track Takes Page question

[bigbrown]

Does anybody knows what is the meaning of the "*" associated with the Track Names at the HANA page below?

http://www.horseplayersassociation.org/hanatrackratingsbytrackname.html

Thanks

[BillW]

Does anybody knows what is the meaning of the "*" associated with the Track Names at the HANA page below?

http://www.horseplayersassociation.org/hanatrackratingsbytrackname.html

Thanks

Those are the tracks that the data couldn't be 100% confirmed. Primarily I had trouble confirming the minimum wager cost data at those tracks ($0.50 tri/pk-3/pk-4 and $0.10 super). If you have a question about a specific track, just ask.

[bigbrown]

Is Bay Meadows the CA track that closed down? It appears with a *

[BillW]

Is Bay Meadows the CA track that closed down? It appears with a *

Yes - this is data from the calendar year 2008 when they were still running (the new track ratings due out in the next month or so will be data from calendar year 2009 and BM will be dropped). The minimum wager cost was the unconfirmed data in their entry.

[RichieP]

Bill
I see the 2 Arizona tracks Tup and Yav lead the way in raping the players with a :20:% rake on W/P/S. That's not a misprint is it? :20:% rake on W/P/S

Has anything changed in this area to your knowledge??

Thanks

[andymays]

And why don't we have asterisks next to the Tracks with synthetic surfaces?

They should be in a separate lesser category in my opinion and the opinion of many other Horseplayers! ;)

[BillW]

Bill
I see the 2 Arizona tracks Tup and Yav lead the way in raping the players with a :20:% rake on W/P/S. That's not a misprint is it? :20:% rake on W/P/S

Has anything changed in this area to your knowledge??

Thanks

No those numbers are accurate as of the latest I have.

[RichieP]

No those numbers are accurate as of the latest I have.

Thanks Bill for the update