PDA

View Full Version : Horsemen Seek Involvement in Betfair Deals | BloodHorse.com


andymays
12-07-2009, 12:33 PM
Horsemen Seek Involvement in Betfair Deals | BloodHorse.com

http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/54301/horsemen-seek-involvement-in-betfair-deals

Excerpt:

Thoroughbred horsemen plan to meet with Betfair officials Dec. 7 to ensure they are party to contracts the Great Britain-based company is signing with United States racetracks for their content.

The National Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association has hosted Betfair officials multiple times over the last several years, and the officials have told horsemen’s groups they are willing to work with them in expanding the wagering marketplace. The situation took a major turn earlier this year when Betfair purchased the U.S.-based TVG advance deposit wagering platform and racing network.

Excerpt:

Powell said a customer earlier this year hit a near seven-figure pick six at Santa Anita Park and was paid immediately by RGS. Santa Anita owner MEC was pursuing bankruptcy protection, so the funds were tied up and RGS was treated as an unsecured creditor.

“If the system is going to work, everyone has to get paid,” Powell said. “You can’t tell a customer, ‘You won, but you’ll have to wait to get paid.' There is no integrity. People are literally borrowing against (customers’ winnings). Most tracks have gotten into the habit of being slow payers on purpose.
“It’s almost embarrassing. It’s 2009, and the industry pays like it is 1935.”

DeanT
12-07-2009, 12:42 PM
Thanks for that link Andy.

The settlement procedure and "cavalier" attitude is another in a long line of monopoly/only game in town evidence, imo. The stock markets would crumble if you bought Intel on Thursday before earnings and made $50k in one day, and you did not get paid for weeks or months. They would never let that happen and rightfully not - it is one of the cornerstones of business.

DJofSD
12-07-2009, 12:46 PM
One horsemen’s representative asked if the system is designed to cut out ADWs so the content providers get more revenue.

“We are trying to say that without saying it,” Kelliher said.

So, who was that representative and what group does that person represent?

andymays
12-07-2009, 02:51 PM
Thanks for that link Andy.

The settlement procedure and "cavalier" attitude is another in a long line of monopoly/only game in town evidence, imo. The stock markets would crumble if you bought Intel on Thursday before earnings and made $50k in one day, and you did not get paid for weeks or months. They would never let that happen and rightfully not - it is one of the cornerstones of business.

This stuff is out of my area of involvement and I know you guys know this stuff as well as anyone.

What's fair and what's not fair for everyone involved?

Who is making all the money and getting more than their fair share?

rrbauer
12-07-2009, 03:54 PM
How does that saying go: Stay close to your friends but closer to your enemies? Dean is right about the settlement issue. I've had ADW operators tell me that it can take 90 days routinely to get settlements from some outlets. Only in horse racing. But, you could say the same about breakage and drugs and probably lots of other stuff if you think about it.

Betfair should hurry up and get its player2player model up and running here while there are players left. While they're in Arizona they better go to work on Kyl.... :lol: :lol: