Full Card Reports

[supguy]

Has anyone had any success using the Full Card Reports if so what do you suggest.

Thanks
Supguy

[Speed Figure]

Full card reports from where?

[markgoldie]

This has been discussed at length here in the past. Do a search under "full card reports".

[markgoldie]

Just did it myself and see you post the same thing about every two months. You were accused before of being a shill, which you denied, but it sure looks like it must be true.

Just for the record: I subscribed to FCR for a short period of time just to see what it was. I found that it is a bunch of bells and whistles like a carnival side show with a slew of separate flags and colorful icons that all amount to nothing. The user gets to pick and chose his favorite icons, mix them together in a personalized stew and find out that, hey, this points out some nice winners on occasion. But so does throwing darts.

I cancelled my subscription when I realized that their master power number for horses was a laughable fraud- often according horses the top number who were not the strongest in the race by any known standard method of handicapping. Thus I concluded that their master algorithm was deeply flawed and if that was flawed, why should I even attempt to mix and match their other icons.

In short, I can recommend to any handicapper that they save their money on this P.T. Barnum sideshow.

And now, Mr. Supguy: Try to remember this post when you next inquire about Full Card Reports, which if past performance holds, should be in Feb. sometime.

[Backstretch Pirate]

Full Card Reports :ThmbDown:

Not bad though, seeing as they narrow it down to about 8 or 9 contenders a race.

Just did it myself and see you post the same thing about every two months. You were accused before of being a shill, which you denied, but it sure looks like it must be true.

Just for the record: I subscribed to FCR for a short period of time just to see what it was. I found that it is a bunch of bells and whistles like a carnival side show with a slew of separate flags and colorful icons that all amount to nothing. The user gets to pick and chose his favorite icons, mix them together in a personalized stew and find out that, hey, this points out some nice winners on occasion. But so does throwing darts.

I cancelled my subscription when I realized that their master power number for horses was a laughable fraud- often according horses the top number who were not the strongest in the race by any known standard method of handicapping. Thus I concluded that their master algorithm was deeply flawed and if that was flawed, why should I even attempt to mix and match their other icons.

In short, I can recommend to any handicapper that they save their money on this P.T. Barnum sideshow.

And now, Mr. Supguy: Try to remember this post when you next inquire about Full Card Reports, which if past performance holds, should be in Feb. sometime.

[atlasaxis]

For those who might be interested, here is the original thread: http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=59176&page=1&pp=15

[trapperman]

I have used them and Racing Picks for so many years now I cant remember.
Apparently they went out of business for whatever reason.
I wasn't interested in there picks so much as I was in the content.
I always used the Gold Cards and I could handicap a race in about 15 sec to 30 seconds.
This combined with the Daily Racing Form gave me an average of 4 winners per card per day from just about any track. That combined with my own handicapping skills which always provided a winner is what I contribute to me being a successful handicapper for over fifty years.

If anybody comes across their product or the product they were using please let me know where to find it.

I feel like I am going into battle without a sword now.

[WoxFan]

I believe that the numbers were based on john beaver's yeast program.