New Layout for Equibase entries.

[macguy]

Looks like Equibase has changed their format for the entries on their website.

I like that it contains more information (medication and bug weights) but it sure is a pain to have to match up the horses with the owners and breeders.

It also seems they no longer show what state the horse was bred in.

Who's idea was this? :bang:

http://equibase.com/static/entry/index.html?SAP=LN

[BillW]

Looks like Equibase has changed their format for the entries on their website.

I like that it contains more information (medication and bug weights) but it sure is a pain to have to match up the horses with the owners and breeders.

It also seems they no longer show what state the horse was bred in.

Who's idea was this? :bang:

http://equibase.com/static/entry/index.html?SAP=LN

You really should write Equibase. I'm not sure they read this site.

[Al Gobbi]

anyone else miss the old Equibase format? Made a mini program if you didn't want to look at past performances for the runners.

[Mineshaft]

anyone else miss the old Equibase format? Made a mini program if you didn't want to look at past performances for the runners.




took me awhile to get use to the new format but I love it now

[JohnGalt1]

I wish someone would offer a simple one page, or even two page scratch sheet listing just the horse, jockey, odds and basic conditions.

I print the old style version of DRF entries from Whobets site that can run 4-8 pages. The DRF has a new version, similar but I prefer the older version.

I print one for each track to record the results and payouts of my wins.

I wish Bris would have a scratch sheet, but their entries list all the minutiae of conditions, which are already printed in the pp's, and it's such waste of ink and paper.