Fairness Doctrine in action

[Tom]

mgTgenwl2aA&feature=related

[jballscalls]

obama said he's going to decrease wasteful spending, and work towards world peace, why would Reagan be against those things?

[Tom]

Because cutting military spending is not wasteful.
And Bummy's vision of world peace is us not not standing up to anyone.

How's his request for sever UN action against NK coming?
We've heard as much from them as we have from Bummy over the pirate situation. World peace is not a likely result of being held at bay by a row boat full of pirates.

[boxcar]

obama said he's going to decrease wasteful spending, and work towards world peace, why would Reagan be against those things?

And you believe him? How are earmarks not wasteful spending? Yet, congress keeps passing legislation loaded with them, and BO keeps signing those bills -- breaking a campaign promise to boot!

And his idea of working towards world peace is getting the U.S. to give up its nuclear arsenal -- unilaterally disarming -- first!? This way only rogue nations have nukes? (This is analogous to law-abiding citizens giving up our guns, so that only crooks and cops have 'em -- and there ain't enough of the latter to go around to protect the good guys!) You like that idea?

And do you think appeasement is good foreign policy? Do you think, for example, that this latest pirate incident demands a military response or is it just a police (law enforcement) issue? And which of our cops have jurisdiction on the high seas? FBI? ATF? NSA? NYPD? Which one of these agencies should go in there flashing their badges at the bad guys?

BO's policies reflect his inexperience, incompetency and most of all his UNREALISTIC ideas -- all of which makes him, as the leader of the free world, the most dangerous person on the planet.

Boxcar