PDA

View Full Version : Rumors,,,,,,, Obama out for more heads


JustRalph
03-31-2009, 05:02 PM
Rumor flying around Charlotte that Obama's boy Geitner has given the Bank of America CEO a week to resign. Obama is flexing his muscles.

Geitner has apparently advised BOA that he would "Prefer" they were based out of NY instead of Charlotte.............

People are steaming............ in Charlotte................

Greyfox
03-31-2009, 05:08 PM
Alex Trebek...I know...I know....
"What is fascism."

Tom
03-31-2009, 10:43 PM
Bad things come in threes.

Marshall Bennett
04-01-2009, 09:25 AM
Good one Tom !! :lol: There is a likeness there .

Tom
04-01-2009, 09:41 AM
Yup. The NEW Big 3! :eek:

cj's dad
04-01-2009, 10:42 AM
Yup. The NEW Big 3! :eek:

The other two at least had a plan. This guys just wingin' it; or should I say flingin' it ??

DJofSD
04-01-2009, 10:55 AM
Rumor flying around Charlotte that Obama's boy Geitner has given the Bank of America CEO a week to resign. Obama is flexing his muscles.

Geitner has apparently advised BOA that he would "Prefer" they were based out of NY instead of Charlotte.............

People are steaming............ in Charlotte................
Lewis to Obama: FY! Strong message to follow!

ddog
04-01-2009, 12:53 PM
poor lighting , but i almost made out Bush in the back there.


maybe it's the fake lip that throws one off.

lamboguy
04-01-2009, 12:57 PM
very interesting topic, quite ingenious

ddog
04-01-2009, 01:16 PM
like skeeters to the zapper, imo.
:lol:

ddog
04-01-2009, 03:28 PM
here's some heads that should roll....
bonus stand , ya say ???? for what exactly???


Shortly before Bernard L. Madoff confessed to a Ponzi scheme that burned through tens of billions of dollars, partners of Fairfield Greenwich Group, one of Mr. Madoff’s biggest feeder funds, were on track to collect a combined $117 million in pay for 2008.

The estimated compensation figures were disclosed in an exhibit to a lawsuit filed Wednesday by Massachusetts securities regulators, who allege that Fairfield’s inadequate due diligence on Mr. Madoff’s operations amounted to a fraud on its investors.

The exhibit consists of spreadsheets attached to an e-mail that Daniel Lipton, Farifield’s chief financial officer, apparently e-mailed to himself on Dec. 11, 2008 — the same day Mr. Madoff was arrested by authorities in connection with running a vast investment scheme.

Fairfield’s $7 billion Sentry funds were more than 95 percent invested with Mr. Madoff, but Fairfield also managed billions of dollars in other funds, all of which performed poorly last year. Even before Mr. Madoff’s arrest, the firm had already conducted two rounds of layoffs.

Nevertheless, Jeffrey Tucker and Walter Noel, Fairfield’s co-founders, were each expected to earn about $19 million in 2008, the document shows. In 2007, before the markets went south, both men made over $30 million. Andrés Piedrahita, the managing partner of Fairfield Greenwich and Mr. Noel’s son-in-law, was to make over $28 million for 2008. In 2007, Mr. Piedrahita took home over $45 million


http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/01/big-payouts-for-fairfield-executives/

I am SURE that these guys worked REALLY REALLY long and hard to EARN this money , after all it's hard to lie and cheat and steal with a straight face and keep up the pretense.

Very hard.


You will wish to pay special attention to the spreadsheet of bonus pays for "investing" with a scammer and not doing any of the duties your "work" would have been obligated to perform.

scamerica in all it's radiant glory.

Someday it really may be "morning in scamerica" and there are a whole bunch that pray everyday that doesn't come in their lifetimes.

JustRalph
04-01-2009, 11:21 PM
the plot thickens. It's like living in Russia..............the State now controls business...........and they are using the Bully Pulpit to threaten

PaceAdvantage
04-01-2009, 11:31 PM
I guess he feels he didn't tank the market enough the other day with GM...:lol:

riskman
04-02-2009, 01:53 AM
States rebel against Washington


"The pushback against federal power began under Bush, but may now be accelerating.

Mr. Pitts has fired a warning shot across the bow of the Washington establishment. As the writer of one of 28 state "sovereignty bills" – one even calls for outright dissolution of the Union if Washington doesn't rein itself in – Pitts is at the forefront of a states' rights revival, reasserting their say on everything from stem cell research to the Second Amendment."

See more here: http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0327/p02s01-usgn.html

Look what is happening right before our eyes.The Feds are engaged in a series of measures to take partial control of the financial system (which is in a coma).) and selected business entities, socialize health care; further implant federalized education; grab guns and ammo; commence class wars; volunteer young adults into mandatory state service camps; and on and on and on.

Take a close look at Rahm Emanuel, Eric Holder, and the other characters of Obama's unfreedom brigade brought to Washington D.C. for a very specific purpose: to centralize every last bit of property and life and put it all under federal rule, from money to education to personal behavior. Note the condescending and arrogant behavior of King Obama on the 60 Minutes television show as he laughed at the inability of majority opinion to do a damn thing to stop his freight train of power grabs and federal takeovers.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNu9xjUwPEk

That twenty-eight states are starting to their own little "Tea Parties "of rebellion by moving towards a sovereign itinerary is a good start. Any action that can be taken to breakup this out-of-control federal monstosity is a positive.

highnote
04-02-2009, 08:38 AM
the plot thickens. It's like living in Russia..............the State now controls business...........and they are using the Bully Pulpit to threaten


Interesting ... what is worse ... gov controlling biz or biz controlling gov?

ddog
04-02-2009, 12:03 PM
pa , you and roofie couldn't be funnier.

you actually DON't believe what you typed in this thread???

it's just your bush blowback line, right???
pls don't let it be serious.


think about who may have wanted waggoner out .....
the list is short, but very strong, afterall , who seemed to be pushing back against a tough , maybe bk type deal for GM???
Waggoner it seems.

Who among the various parties would have been paying "protection" to the bama?

Who is Timmay , with his "plan" going to be dumping the money on???


no not the unions, keep at it.....


007 is that YOU!

JustRalph
04-02-2009, 05:34 PM
Interesting ... what is worse ... gov controlling biz or biz controlling gov?

good question.................do we have a shrugging shoulders emoticon?

boxcar
04-02-2009, 09:00 PM
good question.................do we have a shrugging shoulders emoticon?

Maybe we need to add a new amendment to the Constitution that would set up a wall of separation between the State and the Private Business Sector. :rolleyes:

Boxcar

PaceAdvantage
04-03-2009, 11:25 PM
pa , you and roofie couldn't be funnier.

you actually DON't believe what you typed in this thread???

it's just your bush blowback line, right???
pls don't let it be serious.


think about who may have wanted waggoner out .....
the list is short, but very strong, afterall , who seemed to be pushing back against a tough , maybe bk type deal for GM???
Waggoner it seems.

Who among the various parties would have been paying "protection" to the bama?

Who is Timmay , with his "plan" going to be dumping the money on???


no not the unions, keep at it.....


007 is that YOU!You do realize you've become the jillybeans of off-topic...

JustRalph
04-04-2009, 05:11 PM
You do realize you've become the jillybeans of off-topic...

been on ignore for a while..............