PDA

View Full Version : Alan Keyes: Obama is "radical communist"


Dave Schwartz
03-24-2009, 02:05 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqkMfToY9Pk

Watch this all the way through.

cj's dad
03-24-2009, 02:39 PM
his comments, while sensible and thought provoking, will be dismissed by the MSM. His blackness (like that of Michael Steele) does not fit the desired profile of the left or MSM. Wait, that was a redundant statement.

Greyfox
03-24-2009, 02:45 PM
Keyes is either paranoid or rational. He doesn't seem paranoid. Think.

HUSKER55
03-24-2009, 04:11 PM
It would take so little from Obama to put that puppy to rest.

Why does he not do it?

cj's dad
03-24-2009, 04:34 PM
It would take so little from Obama to put that puppy to rest.

Why does he not do it?


Is it not obvious ?

mostpost
03-24-2009, 04:52 PM
It would take so little from Obama to put that puppy to rest.

Why does he not do it?
Because the people who make these claims are not interested in truth or rational argument. They are only interested in advancing their own agenda. Obama could cite a hundred sources to refute these claims and they would say. "Doesn't count. I don't agree. They must be wrong!!! They must be communists...or liberals..or atheists...or..." And they would come back with a dozen other unfounded allegations. It's worse than Tribbles!

Lefty
03-24-2009, 07:38 PM
Obama's actions sure seem to prove out Keyes words. Obama and Gethner want to be able to take over any company they want to!

highnote
03-24-2009, 07:57 PM
The Bush and Obama administration made a decision to socialize the losses and privatize the gains of banks and large insurers.

The FDIC should have taken over the banks, done in-depth audits, replaced management and then re-privatized the restructured banks. Any person who committed fraud should have been sent to jail.

The FDIC took over failed Savings and Loans and sent 700 people to jail after they did audits and discovered fraud.

The problem is there are about a dozen large financial institutions that pay lobbyists a lot of money and make large contributions to many politicians campaigns. The financial contributions of these large institutions dictates policy.

HUSKER55
03-24-2009, 08:27 PM
mostpost

but he still doesn't do it, does he.

Light
03-24-2009, 08:37 PM
I never liked most of Obamas appointees to the cabinet. But if you're going to criticize him, dont look like you're holding back laughter cause you know what you're saying is bull.He could've done better criticizing Obama.

How can a conservative be a radical commie? All he's doing is continuing the Bush policy on the economy and in the middle east.

He's American born and its an old controversy that he's not. That was designed to discredit him when he ran for office.Its just a rehash. They ask for you're birth certificate when you get a passport. You think the fbi and cia dont know where he's from? Hey Ahnold,did you hear that? Piece of cake when you run.

I dont mind the right slamming Obama,cause I slam him too from the other side. Why is he escalating the war in Afghanistan? Where's the troop withdrawal from Iraq.We're still paying 10 billion a month for a war where the surge supposedly worked while our economy tanks.WTF? The way its setup,there will always be at least 50,000 troops there,even by 2011,when we are supposed to be totally out.They just wont call them troops. Thats bullshit.I told you we never went there for all the bull GW said. Same old, same old. You righties should be happy.

DJofSD
03-24-2009, 08:44 PM
The FDIC has taken over banks. You do not hear too much about this except in local news coverage. Quite a change from the S&L crisis some twenty years ago.

The percentage increase of these take overs compare to last year is stagering. And while "60 Minutes" recently covered this more or less as a public service announcement (PSA) they did not ask very probing questions. Where's the kind of dogged pursuit muck raking journalism we saw when Lincoln Savings and Loan was in the spot light?

The FDIC does not have jurisdiction in the case of companies like AIG. And that is a very good indicator of the problem.

Of coarse, they're talking about keeping these huge multinational institutions in check, now, after the horse has gotten out of the barn. And now that we have a marxist in charge, do we really think this problem is going to be solved in a fair-handed manner? I don't think so. You better be prepared for some pretty low P/E ratios from here going forward.

Oh ya, and the days of the American financial institution being the global powerhouse is now behind us.

BO will be smoozing the bank CEO's on Friday. Think he'll convince them he knows what is best for those institutions?

Will the tax payer taking 90% of the proposed risk with the removal of toxic assets from those "too big to fail" instituions fly with the public?

Will CEO of BAC, Lewis, have his job much longer?

Will the FASB wave a magic wand and suspend mark-to-market rules? Will Blackstone, GS and others be climbing over each other to get to these so-called worthless assets?

Lots of questions. And, I'm afraid of the answers.

kenwoodallpromos
03-24-2009, 09:34 PM
All presidents get criticized if they shake things up, either by getting us into war or talking back to those who make financial decidions in this country.
For many years rich farmers recieved subsidies with the Fed getrting nothing in return, just higher consumer prices.
Now Obama says if the Feds are "loaning" (giving away) billion$ we get something back.
The banks and others are not just doing business in the USA; our billion$ are going overseas- what should we get in return?
Look at the Stronach case- his headquarters is in Canada, yet he has the full use of the American bankruptcy courts to help with his hiade-and-seek. How much more games are the banks and others playing?

BlueShoe
03-26-2009, 04:47 PM
Have mentioned this several times on other threads,but out of protest and dislike of both major candidates,voted for Mr. Keyes,who was on the ballot in California.As for his Obama remarks,remember the old saying that if something looks,acts,and sounds like a duck,then it is very likely that it is a duck?

socantra
03-27-2009, 04:36 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqkMfToY9Pk

Watch this all the way through.
Thanks for the link, Dave. That's one of the funniest clips I've seen in a while. I wonder if Obama is paying Alan Keyes these days.

Lefty
03-27-2009, 11:37 AM
light, righties should be happy? 10 trillion dollars in spending. Cap and Trade. No mention that he's in of domestic drilling or nuclear power. They want the power nowto take over any business they want to. Gethner says he could get on board with a world currency. Higher taxes for everyone. No, righties not happy;

ddog
03-27-2009, 12:05 PM
Have mentioned this several times on other threads,but out of protest and dislike of both major candidates,voted for Mr. Keyes,who was on the ballot in California.As for his Obama remarks,remember the old saying that if something looks,acts,and sounds like a duck,then it is very likely that it is a duck?


which makes mr keyes a quack, no matter the other two.

and people on here said Ron Paul was a nutcase, compared to Keyes???

sorry , i will take someone who has shown some hard real world accomplishments before a REV AL wannabe from the looney (i was gonna type right) , but he is not even there, he's in another orbit all his own.

:lol:

Lefty
03-27-2009, 10:54 PM
dog, really? What was Obama's accomplishments before being swept into office by the msm and uninquiring minds?

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... is a communist duck

BlueShoe
03-27-2009, 11:52 PM
First of all,can someone tell us just what a "community organizer"is,and just what BO accomplished?As for Mr. Keyes,it is refreshing to hear someone not mince words and tell it like it is.Guess that it just not PC for a man to be both Black and Conservative,so out come the brushes that falsely paint him as some kind of extremist.In todays political arena it is perfectly acceptable to be far left,but if anyone is even a bit right of center Right they are depicted as a dangerous person.

Tom
03-28-2009, 10:44 AM
Community Organizer is a code word.
Enough said.
Actions speak louder than words.
So do thugs.

boxcar
03-28-2009, 10:51 AM
Community Organizer is a code word.
Enough said.
Actions speak louder than words.
So do thugs.

Under the Give Act, more than a few stupid people will allow themselves to be duped into "volunteering" and will come to understand what a "community organizer" really means.

Boxcar

Tom
03-28-2009, 11:24 AM
Under the Give Act, more than a few stupid people will allow themselves to be duped into "volunteering" and will come to understand what a "community organizer" really means.

Boxcar

Ain't it the truth.

Tom
03-28-2009, 11:30 AM
and more.....

http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/09/30/national-horror-101/

BlueShoe
03-28-2009, 01:11 PM
Civilian National Security Force (CNSF) as strong and well funded as the military?So Comrade Obama hires hundreds of thousands of unemployed thugs for this project?Lets see now,didnt Hitler do something like this in the early 30's,the brownshirts,the SA?Then after he used them he purged them and replaced them with the SS and the Gestapo.Then of course there was the Hitler Youth.So are these young people that Obama intends to recruit going to be called the Obama Youth?