PDA

View Full Version : Obama's plan in 13 words?


Bubba X
02-26-2009, 08:39 AM
Tax the rich
Feed the poor
'Til there are no
Rich no more.

sandpit
02-26-2009, 08:57 AM
I'd love to change the world...but I don't know what to do.

cj's dad
02-26-2009, 09:17 AM
And when there are no rich no more, then we"ll all be poor.

Tom
02-26-2009, 09:30 AM
I uh, uh, um, I , uh, uh, uh, wait a minute, I uh...

ArlJim78
02-26-2009, 10:19 AM
Tax the rich
Feed the poor
'Til there are no
Rich no more.
and right before those lines?

Everywhere is freaks and hairies
Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity

Bubba X
02-26-2009, 11:21 AM
and right before those lines?

Everywhere is freaks and hairies
Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity
13 words also!

Alvin for Prez!

Though in a few years, it might be Prime Minister of the USA. Or Chairman.

ArlJim78
02-26-2009, 12:11 PM
13 words also!

Alvin for Prez!

Though in a few years, it might be Prime Minister of the USA. Or Chairman.
I wonder when he wrote those lyrics if he had just come from Barney Franks apartment.

*rimshot*

Marshall Bennett
02-26-2009, 02:09 PM
Roses are red , violets are blue , democracy is dead , and free enterprise too ..

Greyfox
02-26-2009, 03:54 PM
Yo ho ho,
A bottle of rum,
BO pirates dough,
Electorate is dumb.

Greyfox
02-26-2009, 04:25 PM
"Say Good-bye to The War on Terrorism,
Say Hi! War on Capitalism."

Burls
02-26-2009, 08:09 PM
It is such a pity too.
After eight years in office, the Bush Administration left America in such wonderful shape.
And now Barack Hussein Obama is going to wreck all of that. :bang:

BlueShoe
02-26-2009, 08:21 PM
1.Tax
2.Spend
3.Tax
4.Spend
5.Tax
6.Spend
7.Tax
8.Spend
9.Tax
10.Spend
11.Collectivism
12.Socialism
13.Communism

Burls
02-26-2009, 08:39 PM
Ya gotta love the Republican emphasis on Fiscal Responsibility after the Bush Administration managed to go from inheriting a SURPLUS to plunging America into the deepest hole it's ever been in.

JustRalph
02-26-2009, 08:49 PM
Ya gotta love the Republican emphasis on Fiscal Responsibility after the Bush Administration managed to go from inheriting a SURPLUS to plunging America into the deepest hole it's ever been in.


yeah, but Burls, so far if my math is right........Obama is going to triple the Bush deficit............

kenwoodallpromos
02-26-2009, 09:15 PM
"not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right"

Thomas Paine, Common Sense.

ArlJim78
02-26-2009, 09:35 PM
yeah, but Burls, so far if my math is right........Obama is going to triple the Bush deficit............
isn't it odd how that works? Bush deficit = BAD, Obama deficit = GOOD

Bush's $400 billion deficit was irresponsible, and left the country in the worst shape since the depression.

Yet Obama's $1.5 Trillion deficit is a responsible way to rebuild the foundation of our great country. his budget director came out today and said deficits are good!

in five weeks Obama with his cohorts in congress have set all the records for fiscal irresponsibility. there is no historical precedent for what they have done, nothing even comes close.

Marshall Bennett
02-26-2009, 10:04 PM
yeah, but Burls, so far if my math is right........Obama is going to triple the Bush deficit............
:ThmbUp: ... and I've got a ring side seat . Obama signed his name to it , its his baby now . Can't wait to watch Burls wet his pants when the shit hits the fan !!

PaceAdvantage
02-26-2009, 11:54 PM
yeah, but Burls, so far if my math is right........Obama is going to triple the Bush deficit............Oh, but JR, he HAS NO CHOICE! If he doesn't, we'll all turn into pumpkins around midnight...

Bush just left things SO BAD, he has NO CHOICE! :lol:

Bush was the one back in the 1970s that started the Community Reinvestment Act...remember? Back in his cocaine days....:lol:

NJ Stinks
02-27-2009, 12:07 AM
Not 13 words but here is what Americans thought about progressive income tax rates when the 16th Amendment was enacted.
__________________________________________________ _____________

"By 1913, 36 States had ratified the 16th Amendment to the Constitution. In October, Congress passed a new income tax law with rates beginning at 1 percent and rising to 7 percent for taxpayers with income in excess of $500,000. Less than 1 percent of the population paid income tax at the time. Form 1040 was introduced as the standard tax reporting form and, though changed in many ways over the years, remains in use today."

http://www.treas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/ustax.shtml
__________________________________________________ _______

I guess back then tax, spend, Collectivism, Socialism, and Communism was running amok too. Either that or people back then recognized ability to pay was an important component of a fair tax system. Sort of like Obama.

Golf and Horses
02-27-2009, 12:31 AM
Not 13 words but here is what Americans thought about progressive income tax rates when the 16th Amendment was enacted.
__________________________________________________ _____________

"By 1913, 36 States had ratified the 16th Amendment to the Constitution. In October, Congress passed a new income tax law with rates beginning at 1 percent and rising to 7 percent for taxpayers with income in excess of $500,000. Less than 1 percent of the population paid income tax at the time. Form 1040 was introduced as the standard tax reporting form and, though changed in many ways over the years, remains in use today."

http://www.treas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/ustax.shtml
__________________________________________________ _______

I guess back then tax, spend, Collectivism, Socialism, and Communism was running amok too. Either that or people back then recognized ability to pay was an important component of a fair tax system. Sort of like Obama.

It is questionable whether the 16th Amendment was legally ratified
http://political-resources.com/taxes/16thamendment/default.htm
That could be a whole other thread. Anyone?

michiken
02-27-2009, 07:43 AM
Generals gathered in their masses, just like witches at black masses? (http://www.ram.org/contrib/warpigs.html)

rastajenk
02-27-2009, 07:48 AM
I guess back then tax, spend, Collectivism, Socialism, and Communism was running amok too. Yes, it was. Do sum readin'.

ArlJim78
02-27-2009, 08:17 AM
I've never understood the arguments for progressive taxation. Its not fair.

rastajenk
02-27-2009, 08:41 AM
"From each according to his ability..." You know, a basic tenet of socialism.

Burls
02-27-2009, 12:25 PM
"From each according to his ability..."Unless, of course, you are well-placed enough to avoid doing your part in the war effort, like: W, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Paul Wolfowitz, "Scooter" Libby ...

Burls
02-27-2009, 12:35 PM
yeah, but Burls, so far if my math is right........Obama is going to triple the Bush deficit............There's certainly no guarantee that Obama's Keynesian 'priming the pump' project is going to be able to recoup all of the money that's being put into it.

Tom
02-27-2009, 12:35 PM
Where did Barry serve?

Burls
02-27-2009, 12:37 PM
Where did Barry serve?There was no draft for him to avoid.

boxcar
02-27-2009, 12:54 PM
I've never understood the arguments for progressive taxation. Its not fair.

It's grossly unfair because all the responsible and productive people who are the engine that drives the economy are penalized and punished by the State for being responsible and productive. Conversely, the least responsible and productive people are rewarded by the State at the expense of the first group.

Talking about "fair" and "unfair", everyone should know and be aware that the term "fair", in one form or another, is going to be bandied around often in this administration. Shudder when you hear a socialist use it because you can be certain that whatever policy or program he's referring to is anything but fair. For example, the Fairness Doctrine is designed to stifle free speech. Designed to shut down vigorous debate, etc. Then some socialist idiot again just in the last day or two brought up one of BO's talking points of his inaugural address, i.e. "fair economic growth" -- GLOBALLY, yet! (Global talk is even more onerous than domestic policy speak because it smacks too much of a centralized world government that would rule the masses.) Fairness and Growth are mighty strange bedfellows -- in fact, they're contradictory concepts once you stop to think about it!

Boxcar

boxcar
02-27-2009, 12:56 PM
There was no draft for him to avoid.

But why didn't he do his civic duty by serving his country by enlisting?

Boxcar

toetoe
02-27-2009, 01:09 PM
I heard His Majesty saying, in stentorian tones, "The time is here ...," which made me wonder whether the place is now. :confused: . (:Chin in hand, woolgathering.)

PaceAdvantage
03-02-2009, 02:14 AM
Unless, of course, you are well-placed enough to avoid doing your part in the war effort, like: W, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Paul Wolfowitz, "Scooter" Libby ...You forgot to add Barack Obama and Bill Clinton to that list....what was he, 29 when the Gulf War I was going on? Why didn't he suit up and serve during what many would consider a valid and just war?

At least W was in the National Guard....where did Clinton and Obama serve?

Can we officially call Obama a CHICKENHAWK now that he is sending our boys and girls into harms way without ever experiencing the horrors of combat himself first hand?

Nah...you wouldn't dare label your man a Chickenhawk, now would you?

Sailwolf
03-02-2009, 04:05 AM
[QUOTE=PaceAdvantage]At least W was in the National Guard....
QUOTE]

W pull strings to be in the Natioal Guard

If he was a true "man" he would have gone to Vietnam

HUSKER55
03-02-2009, 04:50 AM
and Bo would be in Iraq. Come to think of it wouldn't Clinton have been in Vietnam as well?

PaceAdvantage
03-02-2009, 06:17 AM
Barrack Obama....CHICKENHAWK in CHIEF!

Tom
03-02-2009, 07:33 AM
So we can call him......BWAAAAAAACK OBama! :lol:

kent
03-02-2009, 07:42 AM
I have it down to six words.

Obama spoke, the country went broke.

NJ Stinks
03-02-2009, 12:30 PM
Nah...you wouldn't dare label your man a Chickenhawk, now would you?

Chickenhawk: "a political epithet used in the United States to criticize a politician, bureaucrat, or commentator who strongly supports a war or other military action, and actively avoided military service when of draft age."

Brushing aside the silliness of your posts here this morning, I'll play along and ask you a question. Can you be labeled a Chickenhawk when not only did you not want to go to war with Iraq to begin with but are leading the charge to get us out of Iraq - not the other way around? :confused:

Just curious.

Tom
03-02-2009, 12:37 PM
OK, then just plain chicken!

Show Me the Wire
03-03-2009, 12:48 PM
Chickenhawk: "a political epithet used in the United States to criticize a politician, bureaucrat, or commentator who strongly supports a war or other military action, and actively avoided military service when of draft age."

Brushing aside the silliness of your posts here this morning, I'll play along and ask you a question. Can you be labeled a Chickenhawk when not only did you not want to go to war with Iraq to begin with but are leading the charge to get us out of Iraq - not the other way around? :confused:

Just curious.


Yes, when you expand the war in Afghanistan to Pakistan.

boxcar
03-03-2009, 12:50 PM
Yes, when you expand the war in Afghanistan to Pakistan.

Amazing what selectively short memories libs always seem to have.

Boxcar

ddog
03-03-2009, 01:21 PM
"not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right"

Thomas Paine, Common Sense.


the only post of substance in the whole jv thread.
:ThmbUp:

PaceAdvantage
03-05-2009, 06:23 PM
Chickenhawk: "a political epithet used in the United States to criticize a politician, bureaucrat, or commentator who strongly supports a war or other military action, and actively avoided military service when of draft age."

Brushing aside the silliness of your posts here this morning, I'll play along and ask you a question. Can you be labeled a Chickenhawk when not only did you not want to go to war with Iraq to begin with but are leading the charge to get us out of Iraq - not the other way around? :confused:

Just curious.Actually, my definition of chickenhawk is one who actively sends our boys and girls into harms way and never once served this country in any military capacity.

That would define Mr. Obama perfectly as he sends more of our boys and girls off to fight (and die) in Afghanistan.

This man has no first hand idea of the horrors of war (much like Bush was criticized...but at least he actually served in the TANG), and yet unlike Bush, you won't dare label him a CH.

ddog
03-05-2009, 09:24 PM
wow , you just dropped the ch bomb on a bunch of presidents.

very embarrassed for you.

:blush:

PaceAdvantage
03-05-2009, 10:27 PM
Actually, since FDR, the only two presidents never to wear a uniform are Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. That's two out of the last twelve. Both are indeed chickenhawks in my book.

12 out of 43 overall never served. I'm still quite comfortable in what I posted, thank you very much.

Tom
03-06-2009, 10:03 AM
It depends on how you define "served." :lol:

Bwaaaaackkkkkk Obama!