Dutrow Double...

[joanied]

This may be in the wrong place...maybe should be in the thread we have going already concerning Dutrow and This One's for Phil, and Dutrow being a cheat...
but, thought you guys would like to read this article...quite interesting and should spark more debate.

Read it and weep:)

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/horse/columns/story?columnist=plonk_jeremy&id=3864875

[Bubba X]

This may be in the wrong place...maybe should be in the thread we have going already concerning Dutrow and This One's for Phil, and Dutrow being a cheat...
but, thought you guys would like to read this article...quite interesting and should spark more debate.

Read it and weep:)

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/horse/columns/story?columnist=plonk_jeremy&id=3864875
No, this article deserves it's own thread if for no other reason than to spark debate on whether or not this is is among Jeremy Plonk's least informed efforts.

I vote no. Not even close.

[cj]

I threw up in my mouth a little bit.

[Bubba X]

Bad piece of fish?

[miesque]

I threw up in my mouth a little bit.

That pretty much sums it up for myself as well.

[Grits]

His writing skill, (let's not use the word talent) is quite special, no?

With Dutrow at the controls, he becomes legitimate Top 5 material to anyone with a Racing Form and a Derby Jones.

[Charlie D]

Mr Plonk puts it on with shovel , but then refers Mr Beyers Washington Post article


Is this article written with tongue firmly in cheek, i ask

[Tom]

Or head planted firmly somewhere......

[pktruckdriver]

Tom I agree with you :lol: :lol:



But a 117 will be hard to ignore, was the number for real, or was it in doubt?


This almost reminds me Boxers being stolen from there manangement teams from the old days, kinda sad really.