Congressional Approval

[hcap]

I am so tired of hearing that the congress's approval rating is lower than George W. Churchill's.

I posted previous articles pointing to the difference between the dems and repug congressional approval ratings.

Yet the righties here still living in lala land, cling to their mythology.
Thoroughly debunked by a very tired nation this past election.

So although I no longer am interested in arguing with you gentlemen-and you know who you are-just thought I would shake your silly repug myths, again.

"As Gallup showed last month, congressional Democrats are significantly more esteemed than Bush-- and significantly more esteemed than their Republican colleagues in Congress. According to the latest Gallup Poll, 67% of Americans disapprove of Bush, while 69% disapprove of Republicans in the House and Senate and only 55% disapprove of Democrats in the House and Senate."

It looks like the repugs score LOWER than G.W.Churchill !!!


http://static.crooksandliars.com/files/uploads/2009/01/Gallop-Republicans_59861.jpg

Chat among yourselves.
Later

[HUSKER55]

There is a flaw in that study and I know what it is. Go figure.

[lsbets]

Go ahead and brag about your Dems in Congress - Reid, Pelosi, Dodd, Frank, Rangel. Hold your head up high and be proud Hcap! :lol: :lol: :lol:

[JustRalph]

So although I no longer am interested in arguing with you gentlemen-and you know who you are-just thought I would shake your silly repug myths, again.

interesting contradiction in that statement.............

LS was right. Cheer for that crowd all you want. They are the Congressional Equivalent to the Detroit Lions
Except the Lions have nicer uniforms............

[hcap]

You guys are in denial. The election is the final proof.
I am no fan of incompetents, crooks or liars. Whether dems or repugs.
But to vainly hold on to your myth that the congress as a whole is less regarded than GW Churchill, is an exercise in republican talking points. Without the specific breakdown by party affiliation it is nonsense. With some drill down, it is apparent the philosophy of youse repugs, and so-called "conservatives" is no longer selling.

This election compared to 2004.......

http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa82/angryrakkasan/map2-Copy.jpg


Bundle up guys. Time to get used to wearing these :lol: :lol:


http://www.hoffmania.com/.a/6a00d8341bfcad53ef010536a3ad53970b-800wi

[hcap]

So although I no longer am interested in arguing with you gentlemen-and you know who you are-just thought I would shake your silly repug myths, again.

interesting contradiction in that statement.............

No argument. Just facts.

[hcap]

There is a flaw in that study and I know what it is. Go figure.
And? Pray tell?

[Tom]

Originally Posted by hcap
So although I no longer am interested in arguing with you gentlemen-

When does this kick in?
You follow it up with a three-banger! :lol:

[hcap]

When does this kick in?
You follow it up with a three-banger! :lol:Tom, sometimes I can't resist :lol: But seriously how often have you seen me here since we trounced you on Nov 4th? I came across the recent Gallop study, and I just thought it had sufficient annoying content to rile up a few die hard Reaganites. Glad you are riled.

[lsbets]

The election is the final proof?

yeah, the guy who people believed would cut their taxes and reduce government spending won. Sounds a real repudiation of conservatism. :faint:

You live in a fantasy world Hcap. You can see things no deeper, perhaps even less deep, than my 4 year old.

And I especially like the - I'm not going to argue, well until I'm done arguing, then I won't argue anymore, well maybe. :lol: :lol:

Obama is going to be such a huge letdown for you. Its funny.

[hcap]

Hey LS,

As presented to the electorate by the repugs/McCain Palin menagerie, the same old shit didn't fly.

Then again you probably believe the repugs are poised to make a comeback in 2012 with a Palin/Joe the Plumber team :D Keep dreaming.

[lsbets]

You can't read very well Hcap, can you?

[hcap]

The evidence is in your face.
You can't reason very well can you?

Facts not arguments. Later

[Tom]

Fact is, hcap, you do not know why people voted for Obama. As ls said, could be they voted for lower taxes and less spending.....a truly conservative platform. He will not deliver either, but that's another thread.

I submit by two years into his term, his AR will be under 40.

[hcap]

It is obvious why.

Only the die hard Reagonite/Conservative/Repug/Free Market Worshipers have no clue.

If his approval drops below 40 it will be due to the pile of crap he inherits. Doubt he will leave in 2 terms anywhere near how bad your "war preznit" hero scored.

[lsbets]

So although I no longer am interested in arguing with you gentlemen-

Chat among yourselves.
Later

:lol: :lol: :lol:

You've certainly said a few mouthfulls since that pronouncement!

[hcap]

Yeah, as I said the Gallop poll showing the repug members of congress scoring lower than George W Churchill, which not one of you gentlemen have dealt with, was enough to pull me back in. For quite a while most of you would trot out the malarkey about the approval ratings of the "Democrat" congress whenever the dismal failure and AR of George W Churchill was mentioned.

So instead of dealing head on with that poll and others before it, and the reality of the country abandoning your tired bull, you guys post more nonsense. It figures, the "annoyingness" of what I posted brought out the dishonesty in you.

[lsbets]

You certainly get a mouthful from polls Hcap. :eek:

The average Obama voter, in a Gallup poll, couldn't correctly answer which party controlled Congress, so please tell me how your poll has any meaning.

I realize you are at a disadvantage here, since your reasoning skills belong to those of a pre-K student, but try to do more than scratch the surface sometime.

Oh, good job on that no arguing thing. I admire your will power! :lol: :lol:

[Tom]

:lol: :lol: :lol:

You've certainly said a few mouthfulls since that pronouncement!

Since he said that, he has accounted for 8 of the 15 post in this thread.
Good thing he isn't still interested in arguing anymore.....:eek:

[hcap]

You certainly get a mouthful from polls Hcap. :eek:

The average Obama voter, in a Gallup poll, couldn't correctly answer which party controlled Congress, so please tell me how your poll has any meaning.

I realize you are at a disadvantage here, since your reasoning skills belong to those of a pre-K student, but try to do more than scratch the surface sometime.

Oh, good job on that no arguing thing. I admire your will power! :lol: :lol:
The average bush voter, lives in lala land posts bull on this board, and believes in the tooth fairy. You are making it up as you go along. You and your silly friends are discredited. Since Winstons' second term the repugs have gone downhill.
I wonder why?.

Your crap about the "Obama voter" is pure made up crap-and falls apart easily. The country began to reject the repugs and your boy Winston before Obama even came on the scene

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/us4wdavwp0u1kqdfylnejq.gif


Mister Monkey brain deal with the sentiment of the American people not my weakness in arguing with a few pathetic losers. :lol:

[delayjf]

it is apparent the philosophy of youse repugs, and so-called "conservatives" is no longer selling.
So you feel this election was about the US wanting a shift to socialism? If that's the case why was the bail-out so unpopular?

[hcap]

Do you still beat your wife?

Buh bye guys, nice visiting the inmates :jump:

[lsbets]

Dig deeper Hcap - not made up at all. Hey, some of those voters might actually be able to make you look smart, so you should be happy.

Are you really out of here now? Are you really done arguing? :lol: :lol: :lol: Later. :lol: :lol:

[Tom]

I sense he is still around.
I can feel his presence.
Could be gas......

[JustRalph]

Do you still beat your wife?

Buh bye guys, nice visiting the inmates :jump:

where does this come from? I think this violates the TOS, but that never stopped him before......... :bang:

Just go away, .......

[cj's dad]

Not the majority, but more than enough to make up the 8mil difference in the popular vote:

Poorly educated (couldn't pass a simple literacy test)
doesn't work
on some sort of assistance (not SS)
has children out of wedlock
was born out of wedlock
trashes the USA at every turn
doesn't understand economics 101
doesn't pay taxes - except at Mickey D's

You get the picture !

[hcap]

So you feel this election was about the US wanting a shift to socialism? If that's the case why was the bail-out so unpopular?
Do you still beat your wife?

where does this come from? I think this violates the TOS, but that never stopped him before......... :bang:

Just go away, .......I guess cops (and tv drill sergeants :jump: ) are not required to pass tests of logic and be familiar with cross examination
From Wiki....

Loaded question
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Fallacy of many questions)

Many questions, also known as complex question, presupposition, loaded question, "trick question", or plurium interrogationum (Latin, "of many questions"), is an informal fallacy or logical fallacy.[1] It is committed when someone asks a question that presupposes something that has not been proven or accepted by all the people involved. This fallacy is often used rhetorically, so that the question limits direct replies to those that serve the questioner's agenda.[1] An example of this is the question "Are you still beating your wife?" Whether the respondent answers yes or no, he will admit to having a wife, and having beaten her at some time in the past. Thus, these facts are presupposed by the question, and in this case an entrapment, because it narrows the respondent to a single answer, and the fallacy of many questions has been committed.[1]

[hcap]

Not the majority, but more than enough to make up the 8mil difference in the popular vote:

Poorly educated (couldn't pass a simple literacy test)
doesn't work
on some sort of assistance (not SS)
has children out of wedlock
was born out of wedlock
trashes the USA at every turn
doesn't understand economics 101
doesn't pay taxes - except at Mickey D's

You get the picture !You paint a picture you obviously no nothing about. Quite a hateful tirade. Oh well get used to it "dad".

Blue is "in"

http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa82/angryrakkasan/map2-Copy.jpg

The sections of the country that rallied for the repugs are in the red.
Generally the trailing states in literacy, poverty and the poorly informed.
Obama gained in the areas leading in those same categories-blue.

You guys simply make it up as you go along.

[cj's dad]

Please let the little girl out of your closet - her parents are still looking for her. Face painting is so 'passe

You paint a picture you obviously no nothing about. Quite a hateful tirade. Oh well get used to it "dad".

Blue is "in"

http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa82/angryrakkasan/map2-Copy.jpg

The sections of the country that rallied for the repugs are in the red.
Generally the trailing states in literacy, poverty and the poorly informed.
Obama gained in the areas leading in those same categories-blue.

You guys simply make it up as you go along.

[HUSKER55]

hcap, why do you need our approval and exactly what are you trying to prove? Won't the other libs let you into their circle to play? Do you really think Obama got elected without our approval?

I have never seen anyone so starved for attention except for the grand kid and he is only 6.

You still don't understand, do you?

[PaceAdvantage]

I get the feeling Hcap believes that if he stops posting here, PaceAdvantage.com will shrivel up and die.

Perhaps he feels he's doing me a solid for watching his back all those times vs. lsbets. That's just a guess on my part.
These lefties are terrible sports. They want to take their ball and go home now after their mega-victory over 1,150-year-old John McCain. Way to go Dems. That was quite the David vs. Goliath you had going there.

[wonatthewire1]

maybe I'm misremembering but wasn't there talk on the board prior to the election that there was no possible way that the US of A would elect Oboomboom even if a sock-eye salmon was running on the R ticket?

I'll have to do some digging...

[JustRalph]

maybe I'm misremembering but wasn't there talk on the board prior to the election that there was no possible way that the US of A would elect Oboomboom even if a sock-eye salmon was running on the R ticket?

I'll have to do some digging...

A Sockeye Salmon would have been a better Candidate than McCain.......... and more conservative to boot.

[hcap]

True to form. The paceadvantage high-fivers. Congratulating themselves with vigor mindlessly. Babbling as usual.

Instead of attacking my avatar, Or calling me a kid.........

(contact BigMack or toetoe for flowery, conceded stuck-up hoi-poloi pseudo-literary commentary 'bout avatars. )

......How about dealing with your political inadequacies? And the wholesale rejection of repugs this election?

PA, I have not been around much. I would not have posted today except for the Gallop poll showing Winston out-shinning the repugs in congress.

I post facts and get called names. I honestly don't give a crap, but it seems dumb responses about avatars or little kids directed at me is a rightie pastime and almost a rite of passage.

Watching my back with Inspector Javert? Don't go out of your way:lol: :lol:
I give as good as I get.

[Indulto]

Welcome back, hcap.

This thread reminds me of a Bruce Lee movie.

Listen, I have a favor to ask. Please take it easy on BgM and tt. They keep things bearable for me here when you're away. :lol:

[Lefty]

h/cap, the Pravda media has beat down Bush for 8 yrs. That explains his low ratings. But Pravda loves the Dim Congress, yet their approval ratings are in the toilet. If they ragged on the dims like the rag on the Repubs, then they'd have minus ratings. so, you're comparing bananas and avocados.

[Tom]

hcap, you still here????????:lol:

I guess we should be flattered, our approval means so much to you.

[PaceAdvantage]

maybe I'm misremembering but wasn't there talk on the board prior to the election that there was no possible way that the US of A would elect Oboomboom even if a sock-eye salmon was running on the R ticket?

I'll have to do some digging...Isn't there a rule in the TOS against using way too much sarcasm (your reply quoted above excluded of course...I realize that was a dig at me)...

I'll have to do some digging....