PDA

View Full Version : Happy Anniversary


Burls
05-02-2008, 02:46 AM
"Mission Accomplished," 5 Years Later

Since Bush Declared End To Major Combat Operations In Iraq, Nearly 4,000 U.S. Troops Have Died


(CBS/AP) It was a picture-perfect moment, made for the TV cameras, in which a military leader stood before heroes and heroines to declare a victory which seemed to come easier than anyone dared hope, in a conflict which was opposed by many friends and foes alike.

May 1 marks the fifth anniversary of President George W. Bush's "Mission Accomplished" speech aboard the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln.

After shifting explanations, the White House eventually said the "Mission Accomplished" phrase referred to the carrier's crew completing their 10-month mission, not the military completing its mission in Iraq.

"President Bush is well aware that the banner should have been much more specific and said 'mission accomplished' for these sailors who are on this ship on their mission," White House press secretary Dana Perino said Wednesday. "And we have certainly paid a price for not being more specific on that banner. And I recognize that the media is going to play this up again tomorrow, as they do every single year."

After being landed on the deck of the carrier in an S-3B Viking 30 miles off the coast San Diego (Ari Fleischer said the president "could have helicoptered," but "he wanted to see a landing the way aviators see a landing"), Mr. Bush appeared in a flight suit to the cheers of the ship's personnel and the glare of television lights.

Later, he stood at a podium against a backdrop of an enormous banner reading "Mission Accomplished."

To the assembled audience and the world, Mr. Bush said, "Admiral Kelly, Captain Card, officers and sailors of the USS Abraham Lincoln, my fellow Americans: Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/05/20030501-15.html) In the Battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed. And now our coalition is engaged in securing and reconstructing that country.

"In this battle, we have fought for the cause of liberty, and for the peace of the world. Our nation and our coalition are proud of this accomplishment - yet it is you, the members of the United States military, who achieved it. Your courage - your willingness to face danger for your country and for each other - made this day possible. Because of you, our nation is more secure. Because of you, the tyrant has fallen, and Iraq is free.

"Tonight, I have a special word for Secretary Rumsfeld, for General Franks, and for all the men and women who wear the uniform of the United States: America is grateful for a job well done."

The president himself never said "mission accomplished," but that often gets lost in the feelings over the continuing war, reports CBS News senior White House correspondent Bill Plante.

Five years after that speech, after the meaning of the phrase "mission accomplished" and when is a job truly "done" has been endlessly parsed, and after responsibility for creating and hanging the sign was first denied and later accepted, the White House said Wednesday that President Bush has paid a price for the banner, with its affirmative message becoming a target of mockery and a symbol of U.S. misjudgments and mistakes in the long and costly war - a war in which major combat operations are still being waged.

While the White House distanced itself from the message soon after the event, Mr. Bush was not averse to repeating it. Speaking to troops in Camp As Sayliyah in Qatar the following month, Mr. Bush said, "America sent you on a mission to remove a grave threat and to liberate an oppressed people, and that mission has been accomplished."


http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/common/images/v3/quote_open.gifPresident Bush is well aware that the banner should have been much more specific.http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/common/images/v3/quote_close.gif

White House press secretary Dana Perino

Now in its sixth year, the war in Iraq has claimed the lives of at least 4,058 members of the U.S. military - 3,924 of whom have died since Mr. Bush landed on the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln. Tens of thousands of Iraqis have been killed (the true number may never be known, since the Iraqi government does not record tallies of the dead), and millions have been displaced from their homes. And there are currently more U.S. troops in Iraq than there were when the U.S. invaded with a contingent of other coalition forces.

jballscalls
05-02-2008, 08:48 AM
Que the fab five posting that wasnt what he meant!

Tom
05-02-2008, 09:19 AM
Did you post back then that it wasn't over?
Did you warn that there were years more violence ahead?

Try judging the event through knowledge available at the - not after the fact.

The Fab 5 do not rubber stamp every issue as the libs seem to do, but at least we try to be fair about them.

Burls
05-03-2008, 12:44 AM
Did you post back then that it wasn't over?
Did you warn that there were years more violence ahead?
You've got me there,Tom.
I never posted that it wasn't over back then.
However ....

"Numerous State Department analysts and ex-analysts and military Generals warned that the invasion of Iraq would be a mistake at its inception. Their warnings did not challenge the military's capability of defeating Sadam's Republican Guards, but rather the following peace that would follow and occupation of a large, multicultural, multi-ethnic nation. We now know that these analyses were totally correct and on the mark. To occupy the nation and prevent a civil war from erupting, the military would need to be present everywhere, 24 hours and 7 days a week, in all of Iraq. Indeed, stern warnings were made, some of which were purposely muted by then Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld.

The warnings made by some of the Army's top generals stipulated that the U.S. did not have enough manpower to do the job of occupying the nation of Iraq. Today, even with the surge, this number is not even close to the needed estimate made at the inception of the war. Now what is significant about all this? Well, inadequate numbers means pursuing a failed policy, by moving troops from province to province, the insurgents simply move one step away from the real security force of American troops. Meanwhile, while moving from province to province, back and forth, hundreds of Iraqis are bombed and killed and displaced from their homes. The continued presence of American troops results in greater lost of lives for Iraqis rather than producing peaceful and stable Iraqi communities."