PDA

View Full Version : How the nut job stays in the headlines


46zilzal
02-01-2008, 01:35 PM
Ann Coulter said Thursday she'd back Hillary Clinton over John McCain.

(CNN) — In the latest sign that a conservative backlash is starting to build against John McCain, conservative commentator Ann Coulter said Thursday she is prepared to vote for Hillary Clinton over the Arizona senator in a general election match up.

Speaking on Fox's "Hannity and Colmes," Coulter took aim at the GOP frontrunner, and suggested he was little more than a Republican in name only.

njcurveball
02-01-2008, 01:40 PM
Speaking on Fox's "Hannity and Colmes," Coulter took aim at the GOP frontrunner, and suggested he was little more than a Republican in name only.

It is funny that the guy is 70 years old and you are just catching on this? She is not on my "favorites" list, but far from a "nut job" with this view. I have heard it on radio programs for the past few months from many other Republican supporters.

Latest was asked, what would you do if you had to choose between Hilary and Mccain. This lady was a DEVOUT REPUBLICAN. She took about a second and then said, she would just stay home and not vote.

You might think I follow politics, but really only read a little and listen to the radio. Yet this Mccain stuff seems old hat by now. Perhaps it is only on the East Coast? ;)

delayjf
02-01-2008, 01:53 PM
At least with McCain you get a Commander in Chief.

Tom
02-01-2008, 01:56 PM
With McCain, why bother?

riskman
02-01-2008, 02:07 PM
Funny video on John McCain "McConomics"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tu-tg1kQ8dk&eurl=http://race42008.com/

King Ritchie
02-01-2008, 02:56 PM
www.thehill.com (http://www.thehill.com) per Tom Daschle said McCain was on the verge of switching parties in 2001. This RINO was endorsed by the New York Times - need I say more. McCain is a liberal so what we will have in this election is a liberal vs a liberal.

Ann Coulter is correct. Look - when the country goes down the tubes like it did under Jimmy Carter and if McCain is the President then the Republicans will still get blamed. So we might as well let the democrats have total control then we will know exactly who to blame. Maybe this will lead to another Ronald Reagan. Under democratic control I predict a depression, a socialist cuontry (on the verge of becomming communist), continual terror attacks, a miltary on the verge of collapse and evetually a takeover by China - probably by force. So I would suggest that everybody start taking a course in Chinese because that's what you'll need to speak to have any chance of survival.

ljb
02-01-2008, 03:03 PM
Well it is, basically a choice between two moderate republicans. Don't want to upset anyone here but the far right has seen it's day. You all may as well get used to it. The pendulum has swung as far right as it is going to go and will now swing left for the next 40 years. (Thank God).

46zilzal
02-01-2008, 03:05 PM
www.thehill.com (http://www.thehill.com) per Tom Daschle said McCain was on the verge of switching parties in 2001. This RINO was endorsed by the New York Times - need I say more. McCain is a liberal so what we will have in this election is a liberal vs a liberal.

Ann Coulter is correct. Look - when the country goes down the tubes like it did under Jimmy Carter and if McCain is the President then the Republicans will still get blamed. So we might as well let the democrats have total control then we will know exactly who to blame. Maybe this will lead to another Ronald Reagan. Under democratic control I predict a depression, a socialist cuontry (on the verge of becomming communist), continual terror attacks, a miltary on the verge of collapse and evetually a takeover by China - probably by force. So I would suggest that everybody start taking a course in Chinese because that's what you'll need to speak to have any chance of survival.
drinking the same potion as Lefty. McCarthyism is alive and well..

Dan Montilion
02-01-2008, 03:07 PM
So I would suggest that everybody start taking a course in Chinese because that's what you'll need to speak to have any chance of survival. You mean I need to learn Spanish AND Chinese? OH Man!

chickenhead
02-01-2008, 03:13 PM
Under democratic control I predict a depression, a socialist country (on the verge of becomming communist), continual terror attacks, a miltary on the verge of collapse and evetually a takeover by China - probably by force. So I would suggest that everybody start taking a course in Chinese because that's what you'll need to speak to have any chance of survival.

I'm gonna guess your track record with predictions is mixed.

ljb
02-01-2008, 04:04 PM
I'm gonna guess your track record with predictions is mixed.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

JustRalph
02-01-2008, 07:35 PM
I won't vote for the SOB

ddog
02-01-2008, 10:32 PM
that's ok , they won't miss you.
plenty of Dems will make up for you.

kingfin66
02-01-2008, 10:45 PM
You mean I need to learn Spanish AND Chinese? OH Man!

I'm going to keep speaking English no matter what the national language becomes. I'm not worried. Somebody will cater to my need to speak a language other than than the national language.

PaceAdvantage
02-02-2008, 01:52 AM
Well it is, basically a choice between two moderate republicans. Don't want to upset anyone here but the far right has seen it's day. You all may as well get used to it. The pendulum has swung as far right as it is going to go and will now swing left for the next 40 years. (Thank God).Yeah, right. Does this prediction go hand in hand with the Rove/Bush/Cheney perp walks that we were promised MANY years ago?

ljb
02-02-2008, 09:17 AM
Yeah, right. Does this prediction go hand in hand with the Rove/Bush/Cheney perp walks that we were promised MANY years ago?
I would challenge you to show where I predicted a Rove/Bush/Cheney perp walk.
I wished for them but never predicted them.
The only prediction I recall at this time was the re-emergence of McCain as the Republican candidate.

Tom
02-02-2008, 10:27 AM
Clinton and McCanin are to republican as ljb is to objective.

ljb
02-02-2008, 10:55 AM
Clinton and McCanin are to republican as ljb is to objective.
synonymous

kenwoodallpromos
02-02-2008, 12:10 PM
My pick is Ann to run Tbred racing PR.

whiteathame
02-02-2008, 12:26 PM
Well it is, basically a choice between two moderate republicans. Don't want to upset anyone here but the far right has seen it's day. You all may as well get used to it. The pendulum has swung as far right as it is going to go and will now swing left for the next 40 years. (Thank God).

With luck, we may even get our constitution back.

GaryG
02-02-2008, 12:31 PM
Another refugee from the PA witness protection program...

Tom
02-02-2008, 02:47 PM
Another refugee from the PA witness protection program...
Only the names were changed to protect the bored! :lol:

ljb
02-02-2008, 03:04 PM
Only the names were changed to protect the bored! :lol:
Is that why you can't stop responding ?

hcap
02-03-2008, 06:15 AM
Ann Coulter?

The brilliant, the wise :lol: :lol:
Conservative Political Action Conference is an annual political conference attended by some 5000+ conservatives, activists, and elected officials from across the United States
http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/

"I don't know whether to laugh out loud or mourn the ending of an era. I do know that I'd been looking forward to the CPAC convention, which starts next Thursday, for months now -- but the conference's organizers have cruelly yanked away the single biggest reason a liberal should care.

That reason, of course, is Ann Coulter, for whom CPAC has been the annual shining moment for nearly a decade. As I pointed out shortly after last year's convention -- that's the one where where she called John Edwards a faggot -- Ann seemed to save up her most over-the-top, gobstopping, new-lows-in-bad-taste-setting remarks each year especially for this appearance, as a summary of her CPAC performances over the years amply demonstrates:

CPAC 2007 -- "I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word ‘faggot,’ so I — so kind of an impasse, can’t really talk about Edwards.”

CPAC 2006 -- "I think our motto should be post-9-11, 'raghead talks tough, raghead faces consequences.'"

CPAC 2005 -- “Liberals like to scream and howl about McCarthyism, I say let’s give them some. They’ve have intellectual terror on campus for years....it’s time for a new McCarthyism.”

“Since they’re always acting like they’re oppressed…I say let’s do it, let’s oppress them.”

“In addition to racist and Nazi, how about adding traitor to the list of things that professors can’t be? And yes, I realize I just proposed firing the entire Harvard faculty.”

CPAC 2004 -- "You can never be too scandalous in talking about liberals. These people are animals; they want to destroy the country and they support the Taliban and al-Qaida the way they supported Stalin in McCarthy's day." (She also characterized the Democratic Party as being run by "breathtakingly stupid women").

CPAC 2003 -- “Why not go to war just for oil? We need oil."

CPAC 2002 -- "In contemplating college liberals, you really regret, once again, that John Walker is not getting the death penalty. We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals by making them realize that they could be killed, too. Otherwise they will turn out into outright traitors."

(In this same talk, Coulter also accused U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta of being consumed with hatred for America, belittled his experiences in Japanese-American internment camps during World War II, and appeared to imply that she would celebrate if he were killed.)

CPAC 2001 -- Ann Coulter told the crowd that George W. Bush had done a spectacular job during his first month in office, and speculated that perhaps he is far more clever than people had believed. In less than a month, Coulter stated, Bush has managed to totally disarm the Democrat's most cliched criticism: that Republicans are mean. Coulter suggested that Bush has apparently figured out that "all you have to do is go around calling yourself nice," making it surprisingly "easy to hornswoggle liberals." Bush has managed to control the agenda, and will continue to do so, said Coulter, as long as he continues to "treat liberals like small children having nightmares." According to Coulter, it seems as if "the mistake Republicans have been making for years was to treat liberals like adults."

CPAC 2000 -- Coulter received CPAC's annual journalism award.

Tom
02-03-2008, 12:18 PM
You seem obsessed with her....are you in love?:lol:

PaceAdvantage
02-03-2008, 03:32 PM
Actually, if you treat many of those comments exactly as they are presented (COMEDY), how is she any different than any other modern, crass, relatively unfunny comedian?The John Edwards comment was a joke, but you can't tell certain jokes in this country anymore, because, like she said, then you have to go to rehab. Free speech (for some anyway) is dead.

Tom
02-03-2008, 03:46 PM
Anyone who thinks Ann is bad should listen to air heads at Air Head America.

whiteathame
02-03-2008, 06:45 PM
Anyone who thinks Ann is bad should listen to air heads at Air Head America.

Awwww...little monkey need a high colonic?

Tom
02-03-2008, 07:12 PM
I see you're back with a real life photo this time.
Is this a holiday weekend from school?
High colonic........what a clever saying...learn that in recess or rehab?

hcap
02-03-2008, 07:26 PM
Actually, if you treat many of those comments exactly as they are presented (COMEDY), how is she any different than any other modern, crass, relatively unfunny comedian?The John Edwards comment was a joke, but you can't tell certain jokes in this country anymore, because, like she said, then you have to go to rehab. Free speech (for some anyway) is dead.Your a laff a minute Alice eh, PA. A real riot.

Hey maybe she can do a Honeymooner remake. Maybe a Comedy Club stand Up?

I suspect this disqualifies anything she ever said. Or will ever say.
At CPAC 2004 Ann sezs-- "You can never be too scandalous in talking about liberals. These people are animals; they want to destroy the country and they support the Taliban and al-Qaida the way they supported Stalin in McCarthy's day."

HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa....................etc.

PaceAdvantage
02-04-2008, 12:12 AM
If you can't tell which comments are obvious jokes and which aren't, well, I can't help you.

Is John Edwards really a homosexual? I thought not....end of story....

hcap
02-04-2008, 05:52 AM
If you can't tell which comments are obvious jokes and which aren't, well, I can't help you.

Is John Edwards really a homosexual? I thought not....end of story....
At CPAC 2004 Ann sezs-- "You can never be too scandalous in talking about liberals. These people are animals; they want to destroy the country and they support the Taliban and al-Qaida the way they supported Stalin in McCarthy's day."Real funny Alice.

PaceAdvantage
02-05-2008, 01:46 AM
Real funny Alice.Hey man, free speech dude....power to the people, and all that jazz.....

Whatcha want to do? Censor her? :lol:

Now you're starting to sound what you usually RAIL against! :lol: