Bush+Deal with Terrorist?

[hcap]

Duh 1

December 6, 2001:

Q Ari, what's your understanding of the deal that's been struck to hand over Kandahar? And is it acceptable to the President to allow Mullah Omar to stay in Kandahar and live under the protection of the local authorities?

MR. FLEISCHER: .... As for Mullah Omar, the President has made it plain that those who harbor terrorists need to be brought to justice. That statement directly applies to Mullah Omar.

Duh 2

December 9, 2001:

CHENEY:.....And at the same time I think there's a real sense of outrage on the part of many Afghans about what Mullah Omar and Osama bin Laden brought down on the heads of the Afghan people.

RUSSERT: If either are captured alive, we will insist that they be turned over to the American authorities?

CHENEY: Yes.

RUSSERT: No international court?

CHENEY: No. We made it very clear we want Osama bin Laden and Mullah Omar and their senior leadership. And if they're taken alive we expect to take custody of them.

Duh 3

Six Years Later:

Karzai offers Taliban government office

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) - President Hamid Karzai offered Saturday to meet personally with Taliban leader Mullah Omar for peace talks and give the militants a high position in a government ministry as a way to end the rising insurgency in Afghanistan.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21045198/

Duh 4

What happened to the oxymoronic " Bush Doctrine" ????

[Snag]

I thought you weak kneed libs want to talk everyone into submission. Now that someone one wants to talk to someone, you have the gall to question his intent?

[Tom]

Hcap has a very simple agenda once you understand it - it has nothing to do with reality or facts.

[PaceAdvantage]

I can't wait for o0xst! to step in and post a non sequitur YouTube vid....

[o0xst!]

ok!!!! here i am putting stuff in black peoples hair, hugging fatties, and leading "garrett morgan" chants on the price is right

UkIryAGK7PE

I can't wait for o0xst! to step in and post a non sequitur YouTube vid....

[hcap]

I thought you weak kneed libs want to talk everyone into submission. Now that someone one wants to talk to someone, you have the gall to question his intent?According to the so-called "Bush Doctrine", bush himself is now a terrorist.

Of course the entire nine yards of WANTED "dead or alive" has slipped down the memory hole, along with the original reasons we are fighting in Iraq. Replaced by spastic kneejerkering......

"the greatest ever challenge to freedom, a new war of the worlds, WWIII, WWIV, Crusade, and Clash of Civilizations combined. Agin' those Islamofacisistcommiesocialistjihad" guys.

All you nitwits, don't you remember yer wit us or agin us?

Don't youse guys remember nuthin'???

.................................................. .......................

How many neocons does it take to screw in a light bulb? The answer: Neocons don't believe in light bulbs, they declare war on evil and set the house on fire.

[Snag]

All you nitwits, don't you remember yer wit us or agin us?

Don't youse guys remember nuthin'???

So you agree that talking doesn't work?

[o0xst!]

He's simply stating that hypocrasy works with politicians.

So you agree that talking doesn't work?

[Snag]

He's simply stating that hypocrasy works with politicians.


LOl.............hcap is simple............LOL.......I didn't say that hcap.......LOL

What I'm simply saying is that it is not President Bush wanting to talk with the Taliban leader Mullah Omar, it is President Hamid Karzai that wants to talk. hcap simply stated his hate for President Bush and now wants to connect dots that done exist.

Simply a shame.

[Tom]

Since hcap doesn't evist for me, ask him what happened to the ending of the war with his bucnh of losers now in office? Wassup dit dat? :lol::lol::lol:

[Snag]

Since hcap doesn't evist for me, ask him what happened to the ending of the war with his bucnh of losers now in office? Wassup dit dat? :lol::lol::lol:

hcap, simply your turn.........:lol: :lol:

[wonatthewire1]

<<<don't you guy remember nuttin'?>>>

I remember that Clinton spilled some juice on Monica

That's about all that I remember - the juice did make the boy confess

:rolleyes:

[boxcar]

I thought you weak kneed libs want to talk everyone into submission. Now that someone one wants to talk to someone, you have the gall to question his intent?

Exactly! When has a Lib ever met an enemy that they didn't really consider an enemy because they think negotiations and diplomacy will work every time if we persist long enough? One would think the likes of Mr. 'Cap would be rejoicing -- yeah...indeed ecstatic over the prospects of talks, back-slapping and all that nice touchy-feely stuff.

Boxcar

[hcap]

http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=25362&page=1&pp=15&highlight=NEGOTIATE

We all had this discussion before. Many of us were, and still are in favor of negotiating. It's you gentleman on the right that usually bring up Munich and Chamberlain and claim anybody who falls under your stretched analogy is a TRAITOR!

Well, here is the guy we basicly installed- Karzai, as head of the Afghany government being a top-notch Chamberlain.

How come youse guys aren't fainting while clucthing your pearls? Smelling salts PRONTO!
How come no congressional resolution condemning Karzai?

And the war preznit not telling Karzai-yer wit us or agin us partner? What's up wit that?

And as I said on the other thread post #23
We have negotiated, are negotiating, and will continue to negotiate.
Now the question for all you hawks is are we doing this because we got em on the run? Or maybe because we are quagmired up to our necks?

Too bad we didn't have more negotiating and less shock and awe back in march 03.

[hcap]

Hey Boxhead, it is back to you.
Why isn't the loyal lapdog poodle core NOT calling out Karzai.

And more importantly NOT bush?
I guess he's too busy trying to learn how to pronounce af-gan-a-stan and car-si. Maybe 2 or 3 weeks for him to get it down?

Oh my God, so many Chamberlains and so little time!

[boxcar]

Hey Boxhead, it is back to you.
Why isn't the loyal lapdog poodle core NOT calling out Karzai.

And more importantly NOT bush?
I guess he's too busy trying to learn how to pronounce af-gan-a-stan and car-si. Maybe 2 or 3 weeks for him to get it down?

Oh my God, so many Chamberlains and so little time!

And why do you care!? You're whine and complain when the U.S. or our allies don't talk, and then whine and complain when we or our allies do talk with the enemy. A typical lib. A man with 0 principles on which to take a solid stand, except for one. Your whole purpose for existing is to take potshots at Bush for any reason --, contrived, perceived, imagined, whatever.

Boxcar

[hcap]

I care about how we are lead by a hypocrite with a theoretical "foreign" policy that altered our history and honor of how we deal with other nations. A foreign policy that is an abject failure. 200+years of reasonableness discarded and overshadowed by exaggerated threats and irrational fear

My original point is just that, hypocrisy. Not that Karzai is negotiating. Realities and realpolitics call for it. However according to the so-called "Bush Doctrine", Karzai is committing a crime of treason. And so is bush for allowing it.

Everyone here who sang the Chamberlain song, comparing diplomacy with Munich, is now ignoring a serious breach of the party line.

Potshots are not necessary. Just your silence on President Karzai speaks volumes