More workout static

[takeout]

Here's one for the database guys...

I'm admittedly low-tech but the latest thing that I've noticed in the pps that worries me is workouts in January that are obviously for 2002 but aren't labeled with the year and certainly shouldn't be showing up as the most recent works for horses running in December. Won't this result in them being mixed in with the workouts that take place in January 2003 with no way to tell which ones are real?

[cj]

Workouts are stored in databases with the year as part of the field, even if it is not displayed. It shouldn't be a problem at the turn of the year, we'd have heard about it last year.

CJ

[takeout]

I've been informed that when the year changes the 2002 workouts will then be dated. Sure did look weird, though.