View Full Version : Putz thy name is O'Reilly
46zilzal
07-25-2007, 03:18 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLPuGuaZTx8&mode=related&search=
The xenophonbes will love this one. This guy is mental.
46zilzal
07-25-2007, 03:47 PM
Or better ones.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIVnwYGU9Qo&mode=related&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpChNJbILZM&mode=related&search=
JustRalph
07-25-2007, 04:29 PM
This is old stuff..........this happened a long time back...........ok....a month or more............but this was broadcast on tons of media down here in the states ..............good spirited discussion...........
46zilzal
07-25-2007, 04:31 PM
The source of all of these tiffs will never change his narrow view of the world and try to "OUT SHOUT" anyone who tries to offer differing perspectives.
A clown
46zilzal
07-25-2007, 04:54 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHC3MOFb_lg
prospector
07-25-2007, 05:23 PM
she babbled about crap other than the question..i think he was too easy on her..
46zilzal
07-25-2007, 05:49 PM
This clown tries an old lawyer trick: Phrase a question in such a way as to get the answer in your favor no matter the answer.
People see through it all the time and then he just pushes, screams and yells.
He just doesn't allow people to go off topic. If others were like him, we'd get more real answers. No puff ball questions from Bill, no matter what side you are on.
JustRalph
07-25-2007, 06:37 PM
You're right 46.......he is dead wrong. He should change everything he is doing............
and give up the most successful television show in cable history!!!!
bigmack
07-25-2007, 06:38 PM
Don't you & the Al Franken's of the world have other fish to try and fry than O'Reilly, Zilly? Go after Hannity or the bow tied goof on CNN. At least O'Reilly tells it like it is.
You're concerned over a lack of civility with "the shut ups", which is a story about 4 years old? How bout the level of civility from the far left - Take your Koolaid induced pablum about Tony Snow and his cancer that you posted. Real civil.
O'Reilly's a traditionalist. So what. Many of us are. Deep down inside you are as well. You just read crap from your little sites and throw it up here. Whoopie doo. You're informed through a stained glass, and the stain is rather unpleasant.
Name one media person from your loon camp that could come close to the good that O'Reilly has done with just his Jessica's Law effort let alone a few others?
Bill Olmsted
07-25-2007, 06:50 PM
Didin't Big Bill have to settle out of court a few years ago for sexually harassing one of his employees? I think it was a female employee...but I can't be sure.
prospector
07-25-2007, 07:01 PM
Didin't Big Bill have to settle out of court a few years ago for sexually harassing one of his employees? I think it was a female employee...but I can't be sure.
female...but sometimes not worth all the effort/publicity of a trial...
besides, how can anybody hold that against him when the president does it...he was just trying to be like that other bill....
Bill Olmsted
07-25-2007, 07:08 PM
Who is that other right wing bastion of moral values? Rush Limburger?
He's the same guy who advocated the death penality for drug addicts. That is, until he got nailed for taking about 90 Percocet a day.
I love it.
JustRalph
07-25-2007, 07:23 PM
Who is that other right wing bastion of moral values? Rush Limburger?
He's the same guy who advocated the death penality for drug addicts. That is, until he got nailed for taking about 90 Percocet a day.
I love it.
Your facts are wrong. We have been over this before........use the search function..............
Bill Olmsted
07-25-2007, 07:34 PM
Oh Lord, how long. Oh Lord.
bigmack
07-25-2007, 07:38 PM
Oh Lord, how long. Oh Lord.
So it's ultra conservative money manager and mud slingin' politico.
Roger that. Odd jux.
I would love to see Bill moderate a Dem "debate - I saw very few answers last night that had anything to do with the questions. It was like trying to carry on a conversation with 46! :lol:
Bill Olmsted
07-25-2007, 07:56 PM
So it's ultra conservative money manager and mud slingin' politico.
Roger that. Odd jux.
I like that BM. Very good!
PaceAdvantage
07-26-2007, 01:36 AM
People see through it all the time and then he just pushes, screams and yells.
Ever since the left started dominating off-topic, I have found myself watching more and more cable news networks. I was never a regular watcher of Bill O'Reilly (in fact, I hardly ever watched Fox News at all), but in the last year or so, I have been watching him every couple of days....
I saw the particular episode with Rivera where Bill looked like he was going to have a coronary. It was a little uncomfortable to watch, and in an odd way, looked a big contrived, if that's possible.
With all that said, other than that episode, I can't recall ever seeing Bill O'Reilly "scream and yell" as 46zilzal and many others like to falsely characterize.
In fact, he is very much the picture of calmness and rationality in his presentation.
46zilzal
07-26-2007, 01:44 AM
With all that said, other than that episode, I can't recall ever seeing Bill O'Reilly "scream and yell" as 46zilzal and many others like to falsely characterize.
You haven't watched him much then. Just visit You Tube and put in the word O'Reilly in the search engine there.
In the documentary Outfoxed he claims having said "Shut Up" only a few times yet they documented over 30 is a few months time.
In another episode he completely screwed up a report on U.S. troops killed a Malmedy France by the nazi's (he claimed it was U.S. troops killing Germans), was corrected by a soldier who wrote in yet claimed HE was still right.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0aAVifJqDE
A real piece of crap.
PaceAdvantage
07-26-2007, 02:33 AM
Telling someone to "shut up" is equivalent to "scream and yell??"
Not in my dictionary.
And for the record, I can't recall the last time I heard him tell someone to "shut up."
46zilzal
07-26-2007, 02:33 AM
another good example of the idiot at work.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NimlV-hZnyA&mode=related&search=
You haven't watched him much then. Just visit You Tube and put in the word O'Reilly in the search engine there.
In the documentary Outfoxed he claims having said "Shut Up" only a few times yet they documented over 30 is a few months time.
In another episode he completely screwed up a report on U.S. troops killed a Malmedy France by the nazi's (he claimed it was U.S. troops killing Germans), was corrected by a soldier who wrote in yet claimed HE was still right.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0aAVifJqDE
A real piece of crap.
The guy is on every single day for an hour. Of course you could but together bits and pieces that make him look bad. You could do it with anyone. It just kills you guys he is so successful.
PaceAdvantage
07-26-2007, 02:39 AM
You haven't watched him much then.
If you watch him more than I do, then what does that say about you?
46zilzal
07-26-2007, 02:39 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epBR1vf3iV8&mode=related&search=
Putz
46zilzal
07-26-2007, 02:40 AM
The guy is on every single day for an hour. Of course you could but together bits and pieces that make him look bad. You could do it with anyone. It just kills you guys he is so successful.
But then again so is Jerry Springer.
But then again so is Jerry Springer.
Yes, with liberals.
bigmack
07-26-2007, 07:15 AM
A real piece of crap.
Amazing how you get your playbook Zilly. You don't even watch the show. You've recently been programed to dredge up old Youtubes as a result of him attacking your beloved DailyKos.
If he's a piece of crap you certainly don't want to know where that puts you on the totem pole.
JustRalph
07-26-2007, 11:25 AM
O'Reilly has really put his thumb on the KOS crowd and I think it is funny as hell. They are screaming like pigs to slaughter........... :lol:
Even their wonder boy leader is threatening to shut the place down.
He must be getting killed by losing his sponsorship money........ :lol:
All that bandwidth and nobody to pay for it now........... :lol:
lsbets
07-26-2007, 11:53 AM
O'Reilly has really put his thumb on the KOS crowd and I think it is funny as hell. They are screaming like pigs to slaughter........... :lol:
Even their wonder boy leader is threatening to shut the place down.
He must be getting killed by losing his sponsorship money........ :lol:
All that bandwidth and nobody to pay for it now........... :lol:
Since I don't watch TV, fill me in. What's Bill doing to good old Markos?
46zilzal
07-26-2007, 11:55 AM
Since I don't watch TV, fill me in. What's Bill doing to good old Markos?
Trying to put words into Wesley Clarke's mouth.
Lefty
07-26-2007, 11:57 AM
zilly, if you really watched O'Reilly everyday, you would realize he agrees with the left on some issues and criticizes conservatives as well as liberals.
But I suspect you only watched the edited O'Reilly that his enemies put out.
lsbets
07-26-2007, 12:07 PM
Zilly, I'd prefer to get an objective take on the issue, not your slanted one. If I wanted yours, I would just go to Kos.
bigmack
07-26-2007, 12:17 PM
Trying to put words into Wesley Clarke's mouth.
:lol::lol:
As you're one of the minions out here to do the grunt work for the cause, know your cause. You'd best go back to the nipple you draw your feed from and garner more info on why you're required to be pimping O'Reilly this week to earn your badge.
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u70/macktime/mn_common_loon5.jpg
46zilzal
07-26-2007, 12:39 PM
Zilly, I'd prefer to get an objective take on the issue, not your slanted one. If I wanted yours, I would just go to Kos.
what is KOS???
lsbets
07-26-2007, 12:50 PM
what is KOS???
One of the two subjects I inquired about that you attempted to provide an answer to. Ralph said Bill was giving it good to the KOS crowd, so I asked what he had done, and then you answered something about Wesley Clark.
bigmack
07-26-2007, 01:03 PM
Isbets - Jet Blue, an airline, was a sponser of the site DailyKos.com. Last week O'Reilly questioned the CEO about why they would sponser such a site and they pulled their adverts. As a result all the far left sites have been sending word out that he is on the "hit list de jour". Thus, you have guys like Zilly that are spewing stuff when they are less than qualified to spew and unaware of why they were directed to roll out the venum.
46zilzal
07-26-2007, 02:26 PM
McCarthy did the same thing except the word then was COMMINISTS (the way he said it), now it's terrorists.
JustRalph
07-26-2007, 04:55 PM
Isbets - Jet Blue, an airline, was a sponser of the site DailyKos.com. Last week O'Reilly questioned the CEO about why they would sponser such a site and they pulled their adverts. As a result all the far left sites have been sending word out that he is on the "hit list de jour". Thus, you have guys like Zilly that are spewing stuff when they are less than qualified to spew and unaware of why they were directed to roll out the venum.
The timing was almost comical........they added Bill to the hit list and here comes Zilly............. :lol:
Jet blue was also giving away free airfare to KOS members from what I read...........not anymore!!! :lol: Marko's was pissed because Bill O. has been reading some pretty lathered up posts from the site every couple of nights........Marko's in so many words said that the posts were threatening the very existence of the site.......he told them to cool it........ :lol:
see Bill here...........and watch the CEO of JetBlue answer........
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuhnRcZbdo8
more here
http://newsbusters.org/node/14164
JustRalph
07-26-2007, 05:10 PM
and the follow up.........Jet Blue bails out........ :lol:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k6Khf5FJsU&mode=related&search=
46zilzal
07-26-2007, 05:47 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7578-2004Oct28.html
The text of the lawsuit makes a very interesting read.
bigmack
07-26-2007, 06:07 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7578-2004Oct28.html
The text of the lawsuit makes a very interesting read.
See if you can dig up some of his high school grades. That would be interesting as well.
What's your beef with him Zillypuss?
GaryG
07-26-2007, 06:10 PM
He's conservative.....ain't that enough??
46zilzal
07-26-2007, 06:19 PM
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris14.html
bigmack
07-26-2007, 06:36 PM
What's your beef with him Zillypuss?
JustRalph
07-26-2007, 06:41 PM
What's your beef with him Zillypuss?
the Dems put out a hit via email on O'reilly.........so he is doing his duty by going after the Leprechaun on this board............
lsbets
07-26-2007, 06:41 PM
What's your beef with him Zillypuss?
Zilly seems to have a beef with anyone who does not subscribe to his narrowminded views.
bigmack
07-26-2007, 06:44 PM
Roger all that.
I'd like to hear his beef.
What's up Zilly, your beef or are you a mere robotic pawn?
McCarthy did the same thing except the word then was COMMINISTS (the way he said it), now it's terrorists.
The only thing 46, how many of us were killed by comminists?
PaceAdvantage
07-27-2007, 02:10 AM
What's your beef with him Zillypuss?
By Zillypuss, of course you mean "Zillyface"
Lefty
07-27-2007, 02:33 AM
The sad thing is that zilly hears about the terrorists striking all around the world yet he still doesn't think they're a threat. That's pretty dense. And yet, he rags on Bush. GW isn't the fool, zilly. It's John Edwards and any other dem or dem follower that refuses to recognize what is patently obvious.
So much for truth.
Bill O may entertain the feeble minded, so if you like him well....
Commentator uses name-calling more than once every seven seconds in 'Talking Points Memo'
Editors" This study, published in the academic journal Journalism Studies, was conducted and released without any involvement of any special interest group. The researchers received no grant funding for this study. Additional data, charts and the full text of the study are available online at http://journalism.indiana.edu/papers/oreilly.html.
BLOOMINGTON, Ind. -- Bill O'Reilly may proclaim at the beginning of his program that viewers are entering the "No Spin Zone," but a new study by Indiana University media researchers found that the Fox News personality consistently paints certain people and groups as villains and others as victims to present the world, as he sees it, through political rhetoric.
The IU researchers found that O'Reilly called a person or a group a derogatory name once every 6.8 seconds, on average, or nearly nine times every minute during the editorials that open his program each night.
http://newsinfo.iu.edu/news/page/normal/5535.html
PS: I don't think this Indiana University study was funded by George Soros
PS: I find the most farce in his claim that he is not repug or dem. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
http://static.crooksandliars.com/2007/07/tof-hall-miccut.thumbnail.jpg
Bill O is full of shit.
As O’Reilly smeared Kos and YKos yet again, Jane Hall told Bill that his own website had hate comments on it. BillO called her a liar and then they cut her mic off so he was sure to get the last word in…Jane was left talking at the end with no sound to be heard. That’s one class operation BillO has.
O’Reilly: Here’s the truth, I can’t let Jane lie…
http://www.crooksandliars.com/
Lefty
07-27-2007, 11:51 AM
hcap, I watchedthat and Bill apoligizedfor having to do that but he said he could not let her continue to lie about what went on. He does not allow that. He does not allow hateful comments directed to either side of the nature the Kos allows on their site. It's sad when the TRUTH is seen as a smear.
BTW, the EXTREME right hates him as much as you dems leftwingers do, so he's doing something right, eh?
Lefty
07-27-2007, 11:54 AM
He also addressed that garbage that IndianaU put out. Almost anything he said was considered namecalling. Wish I could remember the benign things they considered namecalling but you have came to this party 2-3 months late. Remember, O'Reilly agrees with you dems on at least a couple of things. You prob really don't watch, so you don't know that.
46zilzal
07-27-2007, 12:32 PM
Time will not, nor never has, changed the reality caught right there on YouTube......This guy is a goon of the highest order.
Much like your posts here capture you're disassociation with reality and Earth.
Youtube - basically a toy, doesn't capture context, only simple(ton) views of random things.
How would you explain that infamous clip of Clinton, pounding his fist on the podium, yelling "I-did-not-have-sex-with-that-woman-Miss Lewinski" in light of it being an outright lie?
Does that sum up Clinton's presidency?
No offense, 46, but you are very low rent.:eek:
46zilzal
07-27-2007, 12:47 PM
One film view versus dozens and counting with this clown? no comparison.
GaryG
07-27-2007, 12:58 PM
Ain't it cute to see one of the little fellas playing with a new toy? :lol: :lol:
bigmack
07-27-2007, 01:05 PM
Funny how HCAP & Zilly all of a sudden have a hard-on for O'Reilly for what, saying shut-up 4 years ago, turning off mics every now & then and name calling from at least 3 years ago. :lol:
Like a couple of kids running around mad and when asked what's the matter they respond with "he said shut-up" and "he called someone a name".
Like two small little brat kids.
BooHoo you poor little dears.
46zilzal
07-27-2007, 01:08 PM
As per usual: no one can defend the message so they go after the reporter of the message......
bigmack
07-27-2007, 01:14 PM
As per usual: no one can defend the message so they go after the reporter of the message......
Yeah, you're but a poor little messenger. Uh huh. And, what again is the message?
Advances in anti-delusional medication have come far. Make a call. There's help.
kenwoodallpromos
07-27-2007, 01:45 PM
So far I count between Hcap and 46 name calling 9 times; plus foul language "crap" and "piece of shit" each once on Paceadvantage's forum.
What I want to know is, do they consider themselves typical liberals and/or Democrats? Are they the unruhly rule or the exception? After reading their posts on this thread, I understand how H and O are beginning to call each other names and claiming the other represents a racist state. I almost wish the primaries were later because it looks like H and 46 are not the only libs determined to shoot themselves in the foot AGAIN and give me some fun!LOL!!
46zilzal
07-27-2007, 01:52 PM
What a quantum leap! Last I heard no one here is running for elected office.
As per usual: no one can defend the message so they go after the reporter of the message......
Hey dude - YOU started attacking O'Reilly. If you can't take the heat, SHUT UP! :lol:
Man, I wish he had a mic! I'd cut it off!
46zilzal
07-27-2007, 02:08 PM
Hey dude - YOU started attacking O'Reilly. If you can't take the heat, SHUT UP! :lol:
Man, I wish he had a mic! I'd cut it off!
I'm not on television ranting bogus crap either.
using his own words as recorded on his shows.
bigmack
07-27-2007, 02:19 PM
Hey dude - YOU started attacking O'Reilly. If you can't take the heat, SHUT UP! :lol:
Or, as one of those Penn or Teller guys once aptly said:
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u70/macktime/thSTFU.gif
46zilzal
07-27-2007, 02:22 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIVnwYGU9Qo
46zilzal
07-27-2007, 02:39 PM
better
http://blogs.salon.com/0002874/stories/2003/11/04/billOreillysArmyOfKillerRobots.html
Man, Ziilly, you have lost it.
Not you ever had much of it to start with.
46zilzal
07-27-2007, 03:13 PM
Still no one can refute this clown's demeanor and clueless reporting, or rather his reading a script.
It's only the most popular cable TV show......YOU are in the minority. :lol:
delayjf
07-27-2007, 07:11 PM
Personally, I could care less who he calls names and how often he shuts down a mike. Is there a count for how many times a guest attempts to talk or yell over the other guest. If it were my show I'd turn off the opponants mike everytime it was not their turn to talk. I will say, I enjoyed watching O'reilly bitch slap Phil Donahue. And when was the last time Franken or Donahue gave anybody the last word.
And speaking of attacking the messenger, how about this post. Is Oreilly less obnoxious than Franken? or does your opinion rely soley on the fact that you agree with his poliltics. I don't hear any of you (the left) challenging Oreilly on the content.
If you got issues with the content of his show, bring them up let's debate.
PaceAdvantage
07-28-2007, 01:42 AM
Still no one can refute this clown's demeanor and clueless reporting, or rather his reading a script.
I will refute it. He's well rounded. Tough on those he needs to be tough on, and understanding of those who need understanding. The more I watch, the more I like.
No matter how hard you try, objectively, you can't paint him completely into any corner. Sure, you can make shit up and distort facts to try and convince the unwitting among us, but that's nothing more than smoke and mirrors.
There's a reason his show is so popular....it's because it caters to the MAJORITY view in America, which you will once again be jolted with come November 2008.
Lefty
07-28-2007, 01:54 AM
I challenge you libs' on this forum to prove you really watch O'Reilly and not selected "outtakes" by relating at least 2 things he agrees with the left on. If you can do 3, I'll be impressed.
Once again, Jeopardy theme plays softly in the background..........
46zilzal
07-28-2007, 11:41 AM
I challenge you libs' on this forum to prove you really watch O'Reilly and not selected "outtakes" by relating at least 2 things he agrees with the left on. If you can do 3, I'll be impressed.
Irrelevant. He is a lying putz
Lefty
07-28-2007, 11:45 AM
Zilly, what did he lie about? In your own words, please.
AND, didja know that O'Reilly has been a prominent crusader for our kids? He has been prominent in getting Jessica's law in most states. He goes after judges that are soft on sex offenders. Isn't that a good thing, zilly?
And even if you think it's irrevelent, tell me two things he agrees with you about, zilly. Do that or admit you have no clue.
Secretariat
07-28-2007, 11:53 AM
I challenge you libs' on this forum to prove you really watch O'Reilly and not selected "outtakes" by relating at least 2 things he agrees with the left on. If you can do 3, I'll be impressed.
I have to admit Lefty, I cannot bring myself to digest him. i did watch him years ago, but enough was enough. Just because I don't spend time reading the latest neo-Nazi magazines doesn't mean I don't disapprove of them.
Lefty
07-28-2007, 12:15 PM
sec, do you disapprove of his war on sex offenders; his crusade to make Jessica's law the law of the land; his hard stance on calling out Judges who give sex offenders and violent criminals slaps on wrists? Exactly, what do you dissaprove of?
46zilzal
07-28-2007, 12:17 PM
46......what lie?
How long have you got? and that is plural.
One of the more grotesque was his "psychological" insight that a kidnapped kid asked for and enjoyed being molested.
delayjf
07-28-2007, 12:34 PM
We have all day, proceed sir.
46zilzal
07-28-2007, 12:38 PM
We have all day, proceed sir.
many of the videos are already there, I'm not going to post them again....
GaryG
07-28-2007, 12:46 PM
many of the videos are already there, I'm not going to post them again....What???? You post that usual bs of yours time after time ad nauseam. Let's see what you've got.
lsbets
07-28-2007, 12:50 PM
Zilly can't go after the message, so he attacks the messenger. Its his typical tactic.
46zilzal
07-28-2007, 12:54 PM
message http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/billspins.htm
never attacked the messenger. No names, just referred them to what already was here
46zilzal
07-28-2007, 12:56 PM
What???? You post that usual bs of yours time after time ad nauseam. Let's see what you've got.
OBVIOUSLY no one has bothered to even follow them up. Your loss.
GaryG
07-28-2007, 01:00 PM
Twisting in the wind.....:lol: :lol:
46zilzal
07-28-2007, 01:03 PM
Twisting in the wind.....:lol: :lol:
No that was 1961 with Joey Dee and the Starlighters in the Peppermint Lounge.
lsbets
07-28-2007, 01:06 PM
No names, just referred them to what already was here
Wouldn't putz qualify as a name? :confused:
46zilzal
07-28-2007, 01:09 PM
Wouldn't putz qualify as a name? :confused:
not in reference to any messenger.......Right description to the wrong point.
GaryG
07-28-2007, 01:10 PM
Exposed again for all the world to see....or at least PA members.
46zilzal
07-28-2007, 01:12 PM
Ah, someone beat me to it!
http://www.newshounds.us/2007/07/05/bill_oreilly_named_buzzflash_media_putz_of_the_wee k.php
http://mediaputz.com/07/07/putz0705.html
46zilzal
07-28-2007, 01:40 PM
http://midtopia.blogspot.com/2007/07/bill-oreilly-is-idiot.html
bigmack
07-28-2007, 01:51 PM
Well Zilly, on behalf of all of us in Adultland for your graduated abilities cutting & pasting in both this thread and Sicko - Congratulations.
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u70/macktime/romper_room_diploma.jpg
Next week we'll work on you being able to use your own spoon. Won't that be fun?
Lefty
07-28-2007, 07:11 PM
zilly, are you incapable of posting anything cogent and relevent in your own words. O'Reilly goes after sex offenders and nutty judges. That's a good thing.
Post 1 lie in your own words. Prove you have a few synapses that fire. We have the time if you've got the words. And you will be challenged, so give it your best shot without any links.
Lefty
07-29-2007, 09:23 PM
zilly, i see you can't answer my questions. I advise you to hold critiscisms of people when you just get those criticisms 2nd and 3rd hand. When you haven't a clue, stay out of the conversation; because it makes you look the fool!
46zilzal
07-29-2007, 10:44 PM
Direct video seems not to be in evidence in your court.
46zilzal
07-29-2007, 11:07 PM
http://mediamatters.org/items/200512130005
http://mediamatters.org/items/200512130006
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2007/07/nazis-the-kkk-daily-kosall.php
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/24/oreilly-afghanistan-myth/
Lefty
07-29-2007, 11:53 PM
zilly, you're the putz, you don't understand simple english. I ask you for your own words and you can't provide them but just "cherrypicked" vids that mean nothing. The best evidence is your own eyes and ears for the full prgms and the full context.not some liberal b.s. I asked you to provide me 2 examples of the things that O'Reilly agrees with the left on and you can't find it and have no clue yourself. You criticize but with no clue. You're the putz, zilly, it's you, it;s you.
Do you agree or not agree that O'Reilly is doing something really worthwhile trying to protect the kids; get Jessica's law top be the law of the land and go after judges that go easy on these offenders that molest our kids. Can you answer that without consulting your links? Have you not a mind of your own?
Greyfox
07-30-2007, 12:23 AM
Right or Wrong 46Z, I admire your courage on this board.
You're a character with a backbone of character.
46zilzal
07-30-2007, 01:03 AM
http://blog.throwawayyourtv.com/2006/09/bill-oreilly-worst-8-controversies.html
PaceAdvantage
07-30-2007, 01:24 AM
Right or Wrong 46Z, I admire your courage on this board.
You admire his courage on this board? What a ridiculous statement.
JustRalph
07-30-2007, 02:17 AM
You admire his courage on this board? What a ridiculous statement.
:lol: :bang:
BIG RED
07-30-2007, 02:35 AM
Well Zilly, on behalf of all of us in Adultland for your graduated abilities cutting & pasting in both this thread and Sicko - Congratulations.
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u70/macktime/romper_room_diploma.jpg
Next week we'll work on you being able to use your own spoon. Won't that be fun?
Here here!
Took me 6 years for that sheepskin :faint:
46zilzal
07-30-2007, 01:00 PM
http://www.newshounds.us/2007/07/23/outrageous_quote_of_the_week_july_21_2007.php
http://mediamatters.org/items/200509200010
http://mediamatters.org/items/200509160007
Bill O’Reilly to San Francisco: “[I]f Al Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we’re not going to do anything about it. … You want to blow up the Coit Tower? Go ahead.” [Westwood One’s The Radio Factor with Bill O’Reilly, 12/8/05]
Bill O’Reilly, agreeing with caller that illegal immigrants are “biological weapon[s]”: “I think you could probably make an absolutely airtight case that more than 3,000
Americans have been either killed or injured, based upon the 11 million illegals who are here.” [Westwood One’s The Radio Factor with Bill O’Reilly, 4/15/05]
delayjf
07-30-2007, 02:36 PM
Bill O’Reilly, agreeing with caller that illegal immigrants are “biological weapon[s]”: “I think you could probably make an absolutely airtight case that more than 3,000
Reading the above, The caller is the one calling Illegals "biological weapons" and O'Reilly is only agree to his point that illegals have killed US citizens, not sure where the number came from, it doesn't seem too far fetched to me.
Are you claiming that Oreilly is stating that illegals have killed 3000 US Citizens by transporting diseases from abroad?
bigmack
07-30-2007, 02:46 PM
Are you claiming that Oreilly is stating that illegals have killed 3000 US Citizens by transporting diseases from abroad?
He hasn't the slightest idea what he's posting or talking about. He simply runs around searching "anti-O'Reilly" and throws it up here. You must be one of the few that actually pays attention to his pasting.
Zilly, you've never looked more silly. You're going on about something without a thought in your head. "Must cut - must paste", nice mantra.
What happened to your Taoist ways? You know the ethic of Ci: loving others and the world as a person loves their own existence?
46zilzal
07-30-2007, 03:11 PM
Pointing out ridiculousness is productive.
Does one ever hear of the Tom Brokaw stupidity site? Bob Sheefer? Even Lou Dobbs as controversial as he is at least garners some correct information now and again.
Lefty
07-30-2007, 06:47 PM
zilly, O'reilly not ridiculous but you certainly are. You won't even answer a simple Q. Isn't he doing a good thing by trying to make Jessica's law the law of the land and calling to acct judges who have been soft on crime; especially the ones that let perverts go? Why is it hard to answer this q? Are you afraid you might have to admit that O'Reilly is doing something good and worthwhile? If that's the case you are pitiful.
46zilzal
07-30-2007, 08:13 PM
Now he is threatening callers (who say the wrong words) with "we have your phone number and you are going to get a call from Fox security."
What a jerk.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11698322/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/110306foxsecurity.htm
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/110306Bullied.htm
or,
http://mediamatters.org/items/200601030003
46zilzal
07-30-2007, 08:25 PM
more of those big threats.
http://www.sweetjesusihatebilloreilly.com/archive/051806.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbX-2X7_h-M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCtE4kHGe6Q&mode=related&search=
lsbets
07-30-2007, 08:41 PM
What a jerk.
Does jerk count as a name?
GaryG
07-30-2007, 08:41 PM
This fool who says Fox is not a credible news source cites links from prisonplanet and a hateoreilly site to support his position? Say good night zilly.
46zilzal
07-30-2007, 09:01 PM
This fool who says Fox is not a credible news source cites links from prisonplanet and a hateoreilly site to support his position? Say good night zilly.
but the YouTube videos are right from his show.
46zilzal
07-30-2007, 09:20 PM
Does jerk count as a name?
yes it does, well deserved too.
bigmack
07-30-2007, 09:27 PM
Now that Zillypuss has reached a complete state of psychosis how bout a show of hands on this little condescending A-hole being as bothersome as Zillypuss?
http://www.portcityunderground.com/images/acepartisan.jpg
Lefty
07-30-2007, 10:25 PM
zilly, you can do outtakes from anyone and prove most anything. You can't get context and tone of voice if you don't watch and listen to the show. Sometimes O'Reilly is being facetious but you don't get that with just printed words.
What has been proven right here is you can't put any complaint in your own words from something you have actually watched. And you won't answer a simple q i've asked you at least 3 times.
yes it does, well deserved too.
Thank you for clarifying that, you JERK! :lol:
46zilzal
07-31-2007, 12:07 AM
http://rodonline.typepad.com/rodonline/2007/07/bill-oreilly-sa.html
http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/33009/
http://www.newshounds.us/2006/08/07/bill_oreillys_fixation_on_far_left_persecution_con tinues.php
http://www.newshounds.us/2006/07/27/oreilly_in_denial.php
Lefty
07-31-2007, 12:28 AM
zilly goes to his lib links for comfort. He has no mind of his own and by his silence i guess he thinks protecting our kids is a bad thing. I guess he feels Jessica's law is a bad thing. I guess judges who protect perverts is a good thing. Zilly, that is what you are saying by not answering my q's.
Lefty
07-31-2007, 01:50 AM
BTW, zilly and others: O"reilly was right on by pointing out the dem candidates going to the Kos convention. Hard to blve that they are endorsing this hate site. If enough of the pipples knowthis, no way in hell any of them get elected. Of course, the mainstream media will never tell them.
bigmack
07-31-2007, 02:01 AM
BTW, zilly and others: O"reilly was right on by pointing out the dem candidates going to the Kos convention.
Don't bother with this bucketheaded fool Lefty. He has no idea what he's even posting. Here's one link that he posted that's suppose to be a slam against his arch nemesis of the week.
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u70/macktime/7_30_07_22_40_26.jpg
I have no problem with him having a problem with that, do you?
Before O' it was Bush with Zillypuss, then Cheney then Rumsfeld & many others. He's the type that needs to ragingly hate someone at all times. I suspect it was a troubled childhood with resentment towards the parental units. He'll get over it...when he's under it.
jballscalls
07-31-2007, 10:04 AM
Don't bother with this bucketheaded fool Lefty. He has no idea what he's even posting. Here's one link that he posted that's suppose to be a slam against his arch nemesis of the week.
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u70/macktime/7_30_07_22_40_26.jpg
I have no problem with him having a problem with that, do you?
Before O' it was Bush with Zillypuss, then Cheney then Rumsfeld & many others. He's the type that needs to ragingly hate someone at all times. I suspect it was a troubled childhood with resentment towards the parental units. He'll get over it...when he's under it.
Let me start by saying i'm not an O'Reilly fan. However simply stating his opinion that he opposes the padres is his right as an american. As far as the earlier post about his sexual harrasment lawsuit, i agree with the poster who said sometimes it's easier to just settle out of court and avoid the headache. Most sexual harrasment suits against celebrities are bogus anyways.
when it comes to hypocrasy nobody comes close to limbaugh.
Bill O and a caller to his radio show:
O'REILLY: We've got a caller. Roger. Roger from Portland, Oregon. What say you Roger?
ROGER: Yeah, hey, Bill. First things first. You just said you've been in combat, but you've never been in the military, have you?
O'REILLY: No I have not.
ROGER: Then why do you say you've been in combat?
O'REILLY: Why do I say that, Roger? Because I was in the middle of a couple of firefights in South and Central America.
ROGER: But you were a media guy.
O'REILLY: Yeah. A media guy with a pen, not a gun. And people were shooting at me, Roger.
ROGER: People might think that you actually were in the military.
O'REILLY: Oh... We don't want to mislead anybody. But I made it quite clear... quite clear in many, many circumstances --
ROGER: [mumbles something about being, or not being, "fair and balanced"]
O'REILLY: [quietly disconnects Roger] Yeah. Hey listen, Roger. You can take your little "fair and balanced" uh... snip remark and shove it, okay? You're not getting on this air. Um... You, mister macho man, have never come close to anything I've done, down where I've been. So take a walk and... uh... 'nuff said.
Sounds fair and balanced to me. In combat while taking notes from Falklands War
46zilzal
08-01-2007, 10:31 AM
more and more Putz-worthy talk....
More and more incomplete sentences.
46zilzal
08-01-2007, 11:19 AM
More and more and more.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200508170010
http://mediamatters.org/items/200703220018
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/04/02/oreilly-cuts-colonels-m_n_44787.html
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/11/16/DDG8BFO9ED1.DTL
Lefty
08-01-2007, 11:44 AM
Tom, yep and more and more linksfrom zilly, a man who has no clues of his own and no words of his own. I've been watching O'Reilly almost every night for 3 yrs and can say he is as fair and balanced as a PUNDIT can be. He HAS made it clear on MANY an occassion that he has been in combat but as a REPORTER not a soldier. So the true liberal putz that called can stick it...So can you zilly, bnecause you don't know crap about O'reilly.
Hcap, Will you answer a q that zilly will not? O'Reilly constantly denounces govenors and states that will not make Jessica's Law their law. He constantly denounces judges that go easy on perverts. Is thjat not a good thing? Will YOU answer H'cap?
delayjf
08-01-2007, 12:33 PM
Hcap,
Hanging your hat on that last post as an example of Orielly lying is weak.
JustRalph
08-01-2007, 03:04 PM
Hcap,
Hanging your hat on that last post as an example of Orielly lying is weak.
That's for sure. You think he didn't feel something the other guys with the guns were feeling? When bullets are flying around.........everybody pretty much feels the same way.............scared as hell...........
JustRalph
08-01-2007, 04:31 PM
I love the way these ads show up based on the keywords in the thread
I have seen an ad for O'reilly, Larry King and some crap about "who's biased"
PaceAdvantage
08-01-2007, 05:09 PM
Bill O and a caller to his radio show:
O'REILLY: We've got a caller. Roger. Roger from Portland, Oregon. What say you Roger?
ROGER: Yeah, hey, Bill. First things first. You just said you've been in combat, but you've never been in the military, have you?
O'REILLY: No I have not.
ROGER: Then why do you say you've been in combat?
O'REILLY: Why do I say that, Roger? Because I was in the middle of a couple of firefights in South and Central America.
ROGER: But you were a media guy.
O'REILLY: Yeah. A media guy with a pen, not a gun. And people were shooting at me, Roger.
ROGER: People might think that you actually were in the military.
O'REILLY: Oh... We don't want to mislead anybody. But I made it quite clear... quite clear in many, many circumstances --
ROGER: [mumbles something about being, or not being, "fair and balanced"]
O'REILLY: [quietly disconnects Roger] Yeah. Hey listen, Roger. You can take your little "fair and balanced" uh... snip remark and shove it, okay? You're not getting on this air. Um... You, mister macho man, have never come close to anything I've done, down where I've been. So take a walk and... uh... 'nuff said.
Sounds fair and balanced to me. In combat while taking notes from Falklands War
Sounds like a fair exchange to me...the caller's intent was obviously to bust balls and play with semantics. You don't approve of the way O'Reilly handled this particular caller? I wonder why.....
If Iwere you, hcap (shudder) I would call in to his show and tell him off!
46zilzal
08-01-2007, 09:43 PM
If Iwere you, hcap (shudder) I would call in to his show and tell him off!
Once any caller who disagree with him starts to make sense he cuts their microphone, os it would be a waste of time.
bigmack
08-01-2007, 09:56 PM
Once any caller who disagree with him starts to make sense he cuts their microphone, os it would be a waste of time.
Bullshit. You haven't a clue what you're talking about. You're a Johnny Come Lately to a subject you know nothing about. Why posture otherwise? Oh, I forgot, it's the troll thing.
46zilzal
08-01-2007, 10:01 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHC3MOFb_lg
Disagree? You have a good chance of never being heard.
Shades of old Tail gunner Joe McCarthy as well.
http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/14/oreilly-mccarthyism/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brad-friedman/its-beginning-to-look-a-_b_11880.html
46zilzal
08-01-2007, 10:13 PM
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1083523525796_9//
Here we go again.
JustRalph
08-01-2007, 11:12 PM
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1083523525796_9//
Here we go again.
so topical.........from 2004?
Lefty
08-01-2007, 11:12 PM
zilly, O'Reilly and Jessicaa's law. Is the reason you don't weigh in is because you have no clue as to what i'm talking about because you don't listen to O'Reilly but just dig up endless out of context links from his critics? Hmmm?
H'cap, you didn't have the guts to answer either. Any other lib want to take a shot at answering my question?
46zilzal
08-01-2007, 11:15 PM
so topical.........from 2004?
Trends are like that: consistent
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vyeg5WPAvJ8
46zilzal
08-01-2007, 11:33 PM
never ending it seems.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200504120005
bigmack
08-02-2007, 12:23 AM
never ending it seems.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200504120005
A story of 2002? You're going the wrong way.
Aren't you dizzy yet?
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u70/macktime/zilly.gif
Maybe you could dig up some Inside Edition stuff next.
never ending it seems.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200504120005
If you are refering to your assinine, childish behavior, I agree whole-heartedly.
What do you want to be when you grow up? A link-farmer?
JustRalph
08-02-2007, 08:00 AM
Trends are like that: consistent
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vyeg5WPAvJ8
now that was a little funny............. :lol: at first glance
46zilzal
08-02-2007, 11:14 AM
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html
This makes an interesting read and you find out why this action was brought, and, more importantly, why it was settled out of court.
Lefty
08-02-2007, 12:17 PM
Zilly, you and other O'Reilly detractors that keep dodging the q, "is what O'Reilly is doing to enact Jessica's Law everywhere, go after judges and Govenors a good thing?" You guys refusing to answer and ignoring any q that doesn't fit your "agenda of hate", is a very consistent trend on this board.
46zilzal
08-02-2007, 01:45 PM
before the snear and constant yelling.
http://www.foundrymusic.com/opieanthony/displaymedia.cfm/id/12562/page/show_video_number_12562.html
46zilzal
08-02-2007, 01:50 PM
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1070
or caught again claiming that he won the Peabody award.
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/565.html
Is it your intention to post his entire life here?
Your insanity is becoming tiresome.
Grow up.
46zilzal
08-02-2007, 03:07 PM
Painting a portrait of a putz presented pole to pole.
GaryG
08-02-2007, 03:23 PM
Look in the mirror for that one zilly
46zilzal
08-02-2007, 03:31 PM
One can easily find more character telling material all the time.
http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2007/03/free_to_skewer_oreilly.php
Greyfox
08-02-2007, 03:46 PM
Keep telling 'em Zil46.
http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/755/bushfingerxz0.gif
46zilzal
08-02-2007, 04:22 PM
Advertisers see it too.
http://scholarsandrogues.wordpress.com/2007/07/31/lowes-bill-oreilly-is-nuts-and-we-cant-support-him-home-depot-complaining-about-bill-oreilly-harms-the-environment/
46, do you post on any other site ?
46zilzal
08-02-2007, 06:17 PM
46, do you post on any other site ?
sure, even moderate one.
Lefty
08-02-2007, 07:03 PM
zilly is another gutless lib that won't answer a simple question.
Lefty
08-02-2007, 07:08 PM
When it comes to advertisers, O'Reilly has a few more than Air America, eh?
46, do you post on any other site ?
I know one that banned him......can't imagine why! :eek::lol:
Hey 46....that all you can find?
Not much meat here. I would have thought you could have found a lot more stuff.:confused:
bigmack
08-02-2007, 08:14 PM
Hey 46....that all you can find?
Not much meat here. I would have thought you could have found a lot more stuff.
Not much meat? It's like a submerged child grasping for straws.
46zilzal
08-02-2007, 09:45 PM
I know one that banned him......can't imagine why! :eek::lol:
Yes, Three times for original thinking...But I am still lurking there via several unknown aliases. "Musterbators" you MUST do thing ONLY THIS WAY, can't stand logical questioning of dogma even when multiple examples show it can be questioned.
sure, even moderate one.
Thanks for the answer 46. Can I suggest that you go post this crap on the other boards and spare us your child like concerns? You don't answer questions and continue to bore the majority of us on this board.
46zilzal
08-02-2007, 11:48 PM
Thanks for the answer 46. Can I suggest that you go post this crap on the other boards and spare us your child like concerns? You don't answer questions and continue to bore the majority of us on this board.
no thanks. Don't like it, don't read it...simple
PaceAdvantage
08-03-2007, 03:48 AM
But I am still lurking there via several unknown aliases.
Way to go! You rock!
or
You're the dude who keeps showing up to the party that nobody invited him to....
JustRalph
08-03-2007, 06:37 AM
I wish he would "moderate" on this one.............. :lol:
I find it rather amusing that the "puts" has dominated the troll's life all week - continual posting of links to prove his dull point. Meanwhile, O'Reilly doesn't even know he eixists.
The obsessed very entertaining when they melt down in public. :lol:
He posts about his own comments:
"Don't like it, don't read it...simple"
But he cannot take his own advice. Don't like O'Reilly? Don't watch him....simple!
bigmack
08-03-2007, 02:14 PM
He posts about his own comments:
"Don't like it, don't read it...simple"
But he cannot take his own advice. Don't like O'Reilly? Don't watch him....simple!
Thanks MrT.
46zilzal
08-03-2007, 02:29 PM
http://www.newshounds.us/2007/04/09/free_speech_the_bill_o_rights_giveth_the_bill_orei lly_taketh_away.php
looney tunes.http://mediamatters.org/items/200511300007
'It's almost too easy. He's too easy of a target, really, Bill O'Reilly of the casually toxic Fox
News, too silly and too undercooked, and no one whose opinion you truly value or with
an IQ higher than his waist size actually watches him with anything resembling intellectual
honesty or takes anything he says the slightest bit seriously."
UNFORTUNATELY many with those low IQ's do take what he says seriously.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/11/16/DDG8BFO9ED1.DTL
46zilzal
08-03-2007, 02:40 PM
More empty threats too. He must have studied Joe McCarthy at length. Same empty threatening messages.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200405020006
bigmack
08-03-2007, 02:43 PM
Care to have the courage to debate any of your numerous links Zillypuss or are you a childish drive-by coward?
46zilzal
08-03-2007, 03:03 PM
Is there a country he doesn't want to boycott?
http://mediamatters.org/items/200605190004
46zilzal
08-03-2007, 03:23 PM
The ideological "nephew" speaks.
http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/newmccarthy
Care to have the courage to debate any of your numerous links Zillypuss or are you a childish drive-by coward?
He apparently is not up to a real discussion....only childish rantings.
It used to be called a fit, and sometimes, a coniption fit.
He must live on a farm because he "has a cow" here every day!:lol:
46zilzal
08-03-2007, 03:45 PM
In all the time I have been here there is a single IGNORE person..Guess who that is?
PaceAdvantage
08-04-2007, 02:08 AM
Hey, 46zil, admit it....O'Reilly ROCKS your world!
O'Liely along with Fox have hitched their wagon to the right wing.
This may be early signs that that brand is losing it's appeal, or bush fatique has really set in. Even at Faux.....
MSNBC NOTCHES DEMO WIN OVER FNC IN PRIMETIME
"Countdown" Out-Rates the "Factor" for First Time Ever
NEW YORK - June 10, 2008 - MSNBC continued its ratings surge last week, with viewers flocking out of the "No Spin Zone" and to "The Place for Politics." For the first time ever, MSNBC's "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" was the #1 show at 8 p.m., out-drawing Fox News's "O'Reilly Factor" head-to-head among Adults 25-54. This is the first time since June 2001 that MSNBC has out-rated "The O'Reilly Factor" at 8 p.m.
Excluding Tuesday's primary coverage, "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" averaged 477,000 A25-54 vs. 472,000 for the "Factor."
O'Liely along with Fox have hitched their wagon to the right wing.
This may be early signs that that brand is losing it's appeal, or bush fatique has really set in. Even at Faux.....
MSNBC NOTCHES DEMO WIN OVER FNC IN PRIMETIME
"Countdown" Out-Rates the "Factor" for First Time Ever
NEW YORK - June 10, 2008 - MSNBC continued its ratings surge last week, with viewers flocking out of the "No Spin Zone" and to "The Place for Politics." For the first time ever, MSNBC's "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" was the #1 show at 8 p.m., out-drawing Fox News's "O'Reilly Factor" head-to-head among Adults 25-54. This is the first time since June 2001 that MSNBC has out-rated "The O'Reilly Factor" at 8 p.m.
Excluding Tuesday's primary coverage, "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" averaged 477,000 A25-54 vs. 472,000 for the "Factor."
I, for one, am really impressed. An average of 5,000 more viewers is really "flocking" if you ask me.
Come on hcap. Is that the best you can do?
O'Reily and Fox used to really totally dominate that segment of viewers
Over the last year or so there has been a steady erosion from O'Reilly to Olbermann
The fact that Olbermann has consistently gained and is competitive night after night, illustrates my point. Bush fatigue.
You know they are getting desperate when they dredge up year old thread and post 3,4,5 ties in a row in others. :lol:
Who you trying to convince, hcap, us or or yourself?:lol:
Simply appropo to post here about Putzy, and to hammer you and Ls on the phoney justifications for war.
Oh yeah I forgot...
MSNBC also out-drew Fox News Channel for the week in primetime (June 2-8, M-F, 8-11 p.m.), averaging 496,000 Adults 25-54 vs. 449,000. This is the first time MSNBC beat FNC for the week in primetime since Feb. 25, 2008, when MSNBC telecast exclusive coverage of the Democratic candidates debate. Prior to that, the last time MSNBC beat FNC in primetime was the week of July 30, 2001.
Lefty
06-11-2008, 11:34 AM
hcap, if you'd bother to watch O'reilly you'd know what crap you just posted. Also, other shows at Fox do not confirm this opinion either. Could you giveus some examples. Something you've actually observed and not some claptrap from the leftwing blogs that give you guys those mindless catchphrases and names which you all just repeat like trained birds.
He's reeeeeeeaaaaaacing, Lefty,:lol:
Like the viewership of a TV show means squat to anyone!
"Well, O'Reilly is losing viewers...that justifies my life so far!"
Funny the libs always attack Fox, yet I can't think of any righties who call it the be all end all, and some of us don't even watch it at all!
Who was that guy fighting windmills, Don Quixote?
Lefty, exactly what crap/claptrap do you mean?
That Olbermann did not beat him?
That Olbermanns' ratings are gaining on O'Reily?
Or that bush fatigue is rampant?
Or that Putz is appropriate?
Funny the libs always attack Fox, yet I can't think of any righties who call it the be all end all, and some of us don't even watch it at all!Think of Lefty when you think O'Putzzy :rolleyes:
JustRalph
06-11-2008, 03:55 PM
Lefty, exactly what crap/claptrap do you mean?
That Olbermann did not beat him?
That Olbermanns' ratings are gaining on O'Reily?
Or that bush fatigue is rampant?
Or that Putz is appropriate?
Think of Lefty when you think O'Putzzy :rolleyes:
Bathtub boy is a loser.............O'reilly is getting old and stale. A new lineup is in order on FOX Anyway.
bigmack
06-11-2008, 03:57 PM
More otiose crap in the cap of hcap.
Make life easy. List all your .org sites in your signature and say "This is how I feel about everything"
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u70/macktime/1944.gif
otiose?
Pull that one out your sleeve bunky?
Why bother with simplicity when you can loft your ego artificially for everyone to see and admire?
Hey you could have babbled it in German instead-überflüssig.
Or howsabout "nutteloos" in Dutch.
Actually nutteloos sounds like it is quite your style.
Monsieur Pomposity snuffs his nose and fluffs his sleeve again
http://www.blakeneymanor.com/images/carryon/fop.jpg
bigmack
06-11-2008, 04:59 PM
Explain to us all again how it's "Bush fatigue", O' enlightened one.
Wow, earth shattering stuff. Have something anyone could give a rats ass about or are you grasping for anything, simply posting from Mothership directives?
Mindless drone but one heck of a cut & paste artist. Stand proud of your strengths. They're few & far between.
46zilzal
06-11-2008, 05:07 PM
His modus operandi outlined here.
http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/03/09/19_oreilly.html
Very simple. You do not need an obscure dictionary of archaic Old English or antiquated Norman.( Btw, "cockle" is an old antiquated Norman word, which signifies "arse" :cool: )
Olbermann is catching up on O'Reilly.
MSNBC during prime time is increasing their market share. Fox is losing market share.
Yes, it is my opinion after watching both, Fox is conservative, MSNBC is liberal.
Bush is at ~25% approval. Fewer people polled admit being republican. The war, the economy now have a "republican brand name. Both are tanking.
Do the math
Bush fatigue is simply convenient shorthand for general sentiment out there.
Or bush=cockle
Speaking of cut and paste.
Bush fatigue is more rampant overseas. Do ya think they watch Fox?
Maybe they are glued to the idiot box whenever Billo speaks his profound wisdom of the ages? I suspect Olbermann is more popular. But then again who gives a rats cockle 'bout Old Europe?
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v701/Attaturk/c_06112008_520.gif
Lefty
06-11-2008, 06:47 PM
You were talking about O'Reilly and Fox carrying warter for the R's? Now you want to switch to ratings> Ok, I bet Olberman is not even close to O'Reilly.
I've watched him once or twice, this Olberman Putz, and he only presents one side. O'Reilly and Fox always present opposing viewpoints. Only in the liberal mind is putting forth both sides is carrying water. You are getting be as big a joke as sillyzilly and lbj.
bigmack
06-11-2008, 06:53 PM
I'd talk of frivolous segments such as body language and Millertime being the cause for sagging ratings but my use of frivolous might send you into another hissy fit being the wordsmith you are. :lol:
The 25-54 demo (that's short for demographic) is their only short lived victory.
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u70/macktime/6_11_08_15_44_10.png
http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u70/macktime/6_11_08_15_43_40.png
In conclusion, notify the Mothership, hcap & zilly. It's Hannity ya'll should have your panties in a bind about. Billy ain't much of a Bushrah.
lsbets
06-11-2008, 07:03 PM
Ah bigmack, you know Hcarp can't handle facts. He'll deny them with a linked opinion.
46zilzal
06-11-2008, 07:15 PM
yes, This is sanity personified.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7Nt8MQaKko&feature=related
Lefty
06-11-2008, 07:25 PM
zilly, you always post links to out of context b.s. I watch the guy nearly everyday. He's as fair as they come. I wish he was more to the right.
46zilzal
06-11-2008, 07:26 PM
About as factually based as many of the touts who tell you about 200% profits at the track.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2KU02lsfH8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBzFp7qHDcE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9SEMnjyurY&feature=related
46zilzal
06-11-2008, 07:55 PM
zilly, you always post links to out of context b.s. I watch the guy nearly everyday. He's as fair as they come. I wish he was more to the right.
Yes he REALLY doesn't say all that shit, it is the LEFT WING media that changes it.......
Lefty
06-11-2008, 08:31 PM
zilly, what did he say. It must be out of context. I don't get this second hand like you do, I'm listening. I need a transcript as i'm on dialup and these audio video links dont work for crap.
Lefty
06-11-2008, 08:33 PM
BM, Hannity desn't exactly sing Bush's or Mcains praises and when he does say something positive, The Joker, I mean Colmes is right there. Put some face paint on Alan and with that grin, he could play the Joker in the next Batman.
bigmack
06-11-2008, 08:50 PM
BM, Hannity desn't exactly sing Bush's or Mcains praises and when he does say something positive
Fair pt. Seems like a nice enough fellow. For me, he has a tendancy to drill points to the ground.
What the Lib Mothership has failed to tell their followers is the argument with BO is traditional vrs progressive. They have too many drones out here assuming he's Captain Conservative.
In any event, it's a fun little subject for the kids so we'll let 'em play with the toys they were given, flawed as they are.
Lefty
06-11-2008, 08:59 PM
BM, You nailed it.
PaceAdvantage
06-11-2008, 11:11 PM
O'Liely along with Fox have hitched their wagon to the right wing.
This may be early signs that that brand is losing it's appeal, or bush fatique has really set in. Even at Faux.....Just out of curiousity, how many times has someone from the "right" here on this board touted the serious ass-kicking that Fox & O'Reilly have been giving to all the other cable networks as proof of ANYTHING?
Bush fatigue? I thought this country has been suffering from Bush fatigue (according to you) since about 2002-2003? It's taken this long to manifest itself into a slight bump in the ratings for Keith O?
The next time O'Reilly kicks ratings ass, we'll be sure to post about it....after all, we have to keep up the myth that this board is DOMINATED by right wing Republineocons.
ezpace
06-12-2008, 12:17 AM
thx for the read guys!!!! ;)
JustRalph
06-12-2008, 04:21 AM
A new book that is getting some attention.............. for your perusal
http://www.amazon.com/Makers-Takers-conservatives-generously-materialistic/dp/038551350X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213258700&sr=8-1
Interview with the author
http://a1135.g.akamai.net/f/1135/18227/1h/cchannel.download.akamai.com/18227/podcast/CINCINNATI-OH/WLW-AM/MIKE061108H3.mp3?CPROG=PCAST&MARKET=CINCINNATI-OH&NG_FORMAT=newstalk&SITE_ID=1209&STATION_ID=WLW-AM&PCAST_AUTHOR=700WLW_&PCAST_CAT=Talk_Radio&PCAST_TITLE=Mike_McConnell_On_Demand
I am not claiming Olbermann beats Billo all the time. But he is gaining viewers while Billo is losing.
NYTimes....
June 10, 2008, 1:44 pm
A Ratings Coup for Keith Olbermann
By Brian Stelter
Keith Olbermann
Keith Olbermann may not be going on vacation anytime soon.
Mr. Olbermann, the host of “Countdown” on MSNBC, cancelled his vacation plans for this week when it appeared likely that his program, which debuted five years ago as a distant also-ran to its counterparts on Fox News Channel and CNN, may beat Fox in the 25- to 54-year-old demographic for a full week for the first time.
The amazing thing about the Amazon site has always been to me how many people(sheeple) seem to buy/read books that seem to all agree in spirit with one another anytime you are into the "political left-right-lib-con area".
Judging by the "who bought listings"
Seems to be that lots of people really are not so much curious as clingy.
Lefty
06-12-2008, 11:39 AM
It won't last long, because this guy Olberman, only presents one side. HIS!
O'Reilly, and others, present both sides of every issue they take on. I think people will quickly realize that it'sbetter to see both sides.
JustRalph
06-12-2008, 10:10 PM
it's time for Bill O to move on. He has been on top for over 7 years now...............
Lefty
06-12-2008, 10:21 PM
He's still on top and I don't think he's going anywhere.
46zilzal
06-12-2008, 11:09 PM
It won't last long, because this guy Olberman, only presents one side. HIS!
O'Reilly, and others, present both sides of every issue they take on. I think people will quickly realize that it'sbetter to see both sides.
The putz shows His side and the Fox news side. HINT: they are usually from the same script as the documentary OUTFOXED readily showed
Give us one example of Fox NEWS being biased - one example.
I bet you cannot find one.
JustRalph
06-13-2008, 01:16 AM
Fox took E.D. Hill off the air for calling Obama's "fist bump" with his wife, a "Terrorist fist bump" :lol:
A couple of days ago they were discussing whether Obama's wife was "fair game" for politicians to attack. They ran a ticker/crawl at the bottom of the screen that read
" Fair to attack Obama's Baby Mama"
there is a news producer looking for a job now............ :lol:
46zilzal
06-13-2008, 01:18 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWNEkE1VYz8
Clips from OUTFOXED where many ex-employees tell you how it is scripted.
http://www.outfoxed.org/
bigmack
06-13-2008, 01:55 AM
And to think that all those years of Cronkite, Brokaw, Rathers, Jennings, Williams, NBC, ABC, PBS, CBS, CNN, MSNBC & on & on...That everyone wouldn't know about media slants/bias.
Retrospective media scorecard says:
* Dems: At almost every turn (forever)
* Reps: Fox.
How dare they?
What is it about libberonies that have an intact need for demonization? The list is updated for the followers each day & they eat it up like piggies being fed in the morning.
How pathetic is being fed your own beliefs? Mighty.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWNEkE1VYz8
Clips from OUTFOXED where many ex-employees tell you how it is scripted.
http://www.outfoxed.org/
In English please.
Fox took E.D. Hill off the air for calling Obama's "fist bump" with his wife, a "Terrorist fist bump" :lol:
A couple of days ago they were discussing whether Obama's wife was "fair game" for politicians to attack. They ran a ticker/crawl at the bottom of the screen that read
" Fair to attack Obama's Baby Mama"
there is a news producer looking for a job now............ :lol:
This may get me in some hot water, but ONCE AGAIN, I say, What's the harm , What's the harm???
Don't you want to hear/see where people stand?
That "fist bump" deal was the funniest thing I have heard in a month. I saw/see no harm in it.
As to the "baby mamma" , that just shows old-whiteyness unless they were claiming MO and BO are/were not married at conception of their "little jihadis" in training.
Lefty
06-13-2008, 11:09 AM
zilly, here's a prescient idea: Instead of believing a selfserving faux documentary by disgruntled emplyees, watch for your self and foem your own opinions. Can you do that?
Fox always presents both sides of issues and has guests on the left, right and in the middle. What's wrong with that, unless you're so liberal you just don't like the other side presenting its case. Libs seem to have a big problem with the other guy presenting his views.
Ol Left
sadly you believe what you say, but the "left" as shown in the MSM commentariat including Fox are nowhere near as far left as your rights that are shown and puffed up are right.
not close.
that's the two sides fallacy they let you suck up to.
there are always more than two sides.
Oh, I can assure that YOU would have the bigger problem with those other views being presented.
In fact many other views are never presented on fox or msnc at all.
They are deemed not commercial enough in this country.
weaklings as we are.
Lefty
06-13-2008, 11:33 AM
ol dog, you don't know what hell you're talking about. Fox ALWAYS presents both sides of issues. ALWAYS. Guess you'll have to deal with it. You can lie all you want, don't matter. They always present opposing view. Whenever there's a conservative speaking at colleges, it's the lefttists of the student body that shouts them down and even rushes the stage. It's the leftists that are always trying to revive the misaptly named "fairness dovctrine" to shut dn talk rasio.
I watch Fox all the time and I know what I see but i'm sure wondering about
guys like you, and zilly and some others.
that's just it OL LEFTover,
"YOU WATCH FOX ALL THE TIME"
YOU have made my point so much more forcefully than I could ever hope to do.
Are you really a leftover or do you just play one on PA's board?
As an exercise and lord knows you need some,
name me the top 10 leftist nutjobs that Fox has both as guests and commentators and why you classify them as same?
let's see where they rate.
:lol: :D
Lefty
06-13-2008, 11:37 AM
ol dog, yes, it's commercial tv and they can't talk about everything. But in the political spectrum, both political sides are always presented. They have had and will always have many many dems on as well as R'sand independants.
I don't knowe what's not being presentedyou would like, but guess they're doing something right; as they still bt the pants off the competition.
Maybe you could give some examples.
ol dog, yes, it's commercial tv and they can't talk about everything. But in the political spectrum, both political sides are always presented. They have had and will always have many many dems on as well as R'sand independants.
I don't knowe what's not being presentedyou would like, but guess they're doing something right; as they still bt the pants off the competition.
Maybe you could give some examples.
commercial equal can't talk about everything???
Hmmmmmmmm, who decides what's outside the everything class?
shouldn't the viewers get that right?
Lefty
06-13-2008, 11:51 AM
olsmellydog, your responses on this board get less civil all the time. You have a hard time wih the arguments i present, so like zilly, lbj and others you slip into the namecalling. Quite all right. I understand.
I didn't callthem leftest nut jobs you did, and some i even find quite engaging and likeable.
They have had, just off top of my head, Kusynich, Susan Estridge, Laura Shwartz, Ed Beckley, Lanny Davis, people from Peta, some lady the other night that gave O'Reilly a negative award from a gay rights group, which he accepted graciously. They have had John Edwards on about 15 times before moveon gave marching orders not to appear on Fox anymore. Even Hillary decided to come on Fox to be interviewed byOreilly. Obama, though he promised is still a noshow.
Remember, I called them the opposing view, it was you that called them nutjobs.
One more before I go, Kristin Powers is on regularly. There are many more i just can't think of at this moment, guess i had start making a list.
Oh, I also watch just aleetle of MSNBC and CNN, but can't take much.
The reason I gravitated to FOX is BECAUSE they, unlike so many others, DO give both sides a chance to air their views. Don't know what you have against that, but I think it's GREEEAAT!
Lose The Juice
06-13-2008, 12:01 PM
Why the leftie fixation on O'Reilly anyway? Sensible right-of-centers tend to spend more of their time doing shit like, erm, reading what Victor Davis Hanson or Jonah Goldberg have to say, but the left-libs continue to have kittens about a talking head on a cable TV show with a not particularly vast viewership.
Lefty
06-13-2008, 12:01 PM
dog, I'm sure these decisions are made by the powersthat be with viewers in mind. They must be doing pretty good cause they have a huge viewership.
Really, between the news, Hannity and Colmes, O'Reilly, and Greta, I can't think of anything that's not covered.
What do you think is lacking?
46zilzal
06-13-2008, 12:02 PM
.
What do you think is lacking?
A little thing called objectivity.
bigmack
06-13-2008, 12:22 PM
A little thing called objectivity.
Oh, I get it. You're outraged by their lack of objectivity. :lol:
Golly, those awful Fox people.
http://teacher.scholastic.com/scholasticnews/indepth/kids_primaries/tips/images/matthews.jpg
http://www.wkyc.com/weblog/directors_cut/uploaded_images/Keith-Olbermann-738702.jpg
Imagine someone strutting around acting as if they know all there is to know of a subject because they watched a documentary. "I saw Outfoxed and I have them all figured out". You'd think they were 7. But no...
Lefty
06-13-2008, 12:24 PM
Juice, I like O'reilly because he's fair. Simple as that. I don't always agree with him because I am rightwing, but the man isfair. No fixation. I also watch Hannity and Colmes and Greta. I also watch Glenn Beck on CNN. There ya
zilly, I have a lot of objectivity. When have you ever presented any? I present my views from what I observe. You present yours from 2nd and 3rd hand views from others. Watch O'Reilly or something for a week, then we can both talk from our own observations.
Lefty
06-13-2008, 12:26 PM
CORRECTION: Obama has been interviewed by Chris Wallace. But he has still to fulfill his promise and appear on O'Reilly.
ADDITION: Geraldine Ferraro anoth dem that's on Fox a lot.
ol dog, you don't know what hell you're talking about. Fox ALWAYS presents both sides of issues. ALWAYS. Guess you'll have to deal with it. You can lie all you want, don't matter. They always present opposing view. Whenever there's a conservative speaking at colleges, it's the lefttists of the student body that shouts them down and even rushes the stage. It's the leftists that are always trying to revive the misaptly named "fairness dovctrine" to shut dn talk rasio.
I watch Fox all the time and I know what I see but i'm sure wondering about
guys like you, and zilly and some others.
http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/0/c/bush_sheep.jpg
Lefty
06-13-2008, 08:58 PM
HCAP, you're either the sheeples you potray ne to be or you just lie. I watch Fox, and on political Issues, I see a D on the Left and an R on the riht.
I have posted names of many many dems and leftists that have been on Fox and still you spew the leftwing crap. A mind that is closed and incapable of personal observation, is pathetic. Back to your hateful blogs where you are told not to blve what you see, but what they tell you you see. SEE?
Fair and balanced?
Well to be fair, either Cindy McSame or Laura Bush should have been referred to in the same way.
http://bp3.blogger.com/_sVfYYHr3cdo/SFEsof63voI/AAAAAAAAAqs/5UrTUUY_szk/s400/obamasbabymama.jpg
It is a racial slur Lefty.
"Michelle Obama is no damned baby mama. Born and raised on Chicago's South Side, Michelle Obama saw herself through Princeton University and Harvard Law School, and held prestigious positions in the Chicago law firm Sidley Austin and on the staff of Mayor Richard M. Daley. And now she stands to become the first black First Lady of the United States of America. She deserves respect, dammit. She's not some character out of the Jerry Springer Show. That Fox chose to tag her with this grossly disrespectful, racist label is beyond vile. Rupert Murdoch should immediately fire everyone responsible for this reprehensible act."
Don't youse guys agree?
Lefty do you watch Jerry Springer?
hcap, be very careful with your rant and outrage.
Michelle Obama referred to herself that way. She can't say it and then reserve it only for herself.
Lefty
06-14-2008, 11:45 AM
h'cap, isn't that Michelle Malkin you're showing on the left in the picture? Did she say that. If so, she ain't O'Reilly and she ain't white.
If you would watch instead of getting all your so called info from blogs telling you howto think YOU WOULD see they balance the left and right. How many Dems have to appear on a prgm before you say it's fair. I named a lot of names, off top of my head, of the dems that have appeared. How many conservatives has Olberman had on?
BTW, when all you leftwinger on this board keep using those names you got from the blogs like Faux, Mcsame and O'liely, you just expose yourselves for the cracker eaters you are.
Btw, I don't remember seeing any outrage from you, as there have been plenty of racial slurs, including cartoons about Condaleeza Rice. Nary a one.
I think "Obama's Baby Mama" used by Fox was pretty low. A slang term popularized in the African American community to describe the mother of a child born out of wedlock. It is quite different than Michelle Obama calling her husband "My baby’s daddy" during an intro to his Senate speech......
From a CNN transcript:
BLITZER: We can take a look. Maybe he will and maybe he won’t but she looks like she’s about to introduce him. Let’s listen in.
MICHELLE OBAMA, WIFE OF BARACK OBAMA: My baby’s daddy Barack Obama. Yeah!
BTW:
Michelle Obama
Age: 44, born Jan. 17, 1964.
Education: Bachelor's in sociology, Princeton University, 1985. Law degree, Harvard Law School, 1988.
Career: She worked for three years at a Chicago law firm, where she met Barack Obama. In 1991, she began a career in public service with the city of Chicago. In 2005, she was appointed vice president of community and external affairs at the University of Chicago Medical Center.
Personal: The Obamas were married in 1992 and have two daughters, Malia, 9, and Sasha, 7.
Lefty
06-14-2008, 07:22 PM
That's one comment from a guest and it was Michelle Malkin, I thght you libs have said only white people can bew racist?
You have never said one word about the many many racist comments made about Condie Rice over several yrs. Take your selective offense dn the road and peddle it somewhere else. I'm not buying any today.
JustRalph
06-14-2008, 07:53 PM
Typical...........she can use the phrase............but nobody else can............HUH? Typical............
wonatthewire1
06-14-2008, 08:21 PM
Typical...........she can use the phrase............but nobody else can............HUH? Typical............
...what phrase?
Lefty
06-14-2008, 08:33 PM
won, you have to pay more attention.
wonatthewire1
06-14-2008, 08:38 PM
have never heard her speak...guess i'm busy making money instead of worrying abt these idiots in washingtoon
Lefty
06-14-2008, 08:51 PM
won, great, but there's a dude named Obama that wants your money. Be afraid, be very afraid...
I think "Obama's Baby Mama" used by Fox was pretty low. A slang term popularized in the African American community to describe the mother of a child born out of wedlock. It is quite different than Michelle Obama calling her husband "My baby’s daddy" during an intro to his Senate speech......
From a CNN transcript:
BLITZER: We can take a look. Maybe he will and maybe he won’t but she looks like she’s about to introduce him. Let’s listen in.
MICHELLE OBAMA, WIFE OF BARACK OBAMA: My baby’s daddy Barack Obama. Yeah!
.
hcap, you are wrong once again. Michelle Malkin did NOT call or say this. The only time it was used was a crawl at the bottom of the screen while Michelle was talking. She never used the words.
You might want to get your facts straight before posting.
All the crap hcap has posted about Bush, I think he is the ALST person to show outrage over name calling. Just can't take what he dishes out I guess. Weak willed people are a dime a dozen. Maybe he can work Obama as his director of "More stuff you can't talk about because I'm Obama and I Bruise like a peach!"
Hey, Po 'lil Michelle better get used to it....she opened her vile mouth and insulted this country - now she is fair game and believe me, the mud is going to bury this bimbo. Rightfully so.
lsbets
06-14-2008, 11:15 PM
Career: She worked for three years at a Chicago law firm, where she met Barack Obama. In 1991, she began a career in public service with the city of Chicago. In 2005, she was appointed vice president of community and external affairs at the University of Chicago Medical Center.
And shortly after her promotion, her Senator husband appropriated a 7 figure earmark for her employer. But of course the earmark had nothing to do with her promotion and raise, he's a "new" kind of politician. :lol:
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.