MNslappy
05-06-2007, 03:41 AM
Ok, it's 230 AM and officially the day after the Derby. So let me start the Preakness speculation with this:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/horseracing/bal-sp.derbynotes05may05,0,3680723.story?coll=bal-sports-horse
With 100,075 fans jamming into Churchill Downs yesterday, Rags to Riches sat off the pace in the Grade I, $500,000 Kentucky Oaks, waiting to make her point.
Rags to Riches, the California filly who has been criticized for building her resume against less than the strongest contenders, shut everyone up with her charge down the stretch to victory. With mud flying, the A.P. Indy 3-year-old drew away from the field and beat Octave to the finish by 4 1/4 lengths.
"She hadn't been in these conditions before and to be between horses was a concern, but we know she's a very good filly and we were hopeful," said owner Michael Tabor, who won the Kentucky Derby with Thunder Gulch in 1995. "I was nervous for only a second or so. She's a valuable broodmare, but this is what you dream about." A traditionalist, Tabor had turned down the opportunity to run the filly in today's Kentucky Derby, but said after the Oaks: "Maybe we'll step up now."
So, this amateur player would like all of you seasoned vets to give your opinions.
#1 If she had run in the Derby, do you think she would have had a shot at hitting the board given the way the race was run and the way it played out, or would she have been completely overmatched?
#2 Is it far-fetched to think that this filly might have actually been Pletcher's best shot at finally winning the big one? Is he sitting by himself doing this :bang: right now over Tabor's decision not to run her?
#3 Do you think she will run in the Preakness and/or do you think she should run in the Preakness?
I'm looking forward to seeing what you guys think, I really respect the opinions here.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/horseracing/bal-sp.derbynotes05may05,0,3680723.story?coll=bal-sports-horse
With 100,075 fans jamming into Churchill Downs yesterday, Rags to Riches sat off the pace in the Grade I, $500,000 Kentucky Oaks, waiting to make her point.
Rags to Riches, the California filly who has been criticized for building her resume against less than the strongest contenders, shut everyone up with her charge down the stretch to victory. With mud flying, the A.P. Indy 3-year-old drew away from the field and beat Octave to the finish by 4 1/4 lengths.
"She hadn't been in these conditions before and to be between horses was a concern, but we know she's a very good filly and we were hopeful," said owner Michael Tabor, who won the Kentucky Derby with Thunder Gulch in 1995. "I was nervous for only a second or so. She's a valuable broodmare, but this is what you dream about." A traditionalist, Tabor had turned down the opportunity to run the filly in today's Kentucky Derby, but said after the Oaks: "Maybe we'll step up now."
So, this amateur player would like all of you seasoned vets to give your opinions.
#1 If she had run in the Derby, do you think she would have had a shot at hitting the board given the way the race was run and the way it played out, or would she have been completely overmatched?
#2 Is it far-fetched to think that this filly might have actually been Pletcher's best shot at finally winning the big one? Is he sitting by himself doing this :bang: right now over Tabor's decision not to run her?
#3 Do you think she will run in the Preakness and/or do you think she should run in the Preakness?
I'm looking forward to seeing what you guys think, I really respect the opinions here.