pinnacle matchups for 05/19/2006

[formula_2002]

track race name line line
BEL R5 CHILLY ROO 156
BEL R5 INTERPATAT -172 play

BEL R8 BAILERO -145
BEL R8 HAPPY HUNT 129 play

PIM R10 POOL LAND -139
PIM R10 JOSHS MADE 123

PIM R11 SMART N PR 103
PIM R11 RED CHERRI -119 play

PIM R11 GASIA -115
PIM R11 BAGHDARIA -101 play

PIM R12 WEST VIRGI -172 play
PIM R12 WE CAN SEE 156

PIM R8 PRESS CAMP 103
PIM R8 WILDCAT BE -119 play

PIM R9 KISS ME KA -118
PIM R9 WILD BERRY 102 play

HOL R2 QUASIMODO -143
HOL R2 EASTERN SA 127 play

HOL R4 SULTRY BAR 151
HOL R4 PAPA SQUIR -167 play

HOL R5 LOWER SHOR -115 play
HOL R5 POPOKI -101

HOL R6 MISS TOPPE 132
HOL R6 STORM HEAR -148 play

[formula_2002]

Going into hol night card.


4 wins in 6 plays, $200 profit, $739 played

[ryesteve]

Did you mean to mark Pool Land as a play? Not counting that race, I only count 5 early plays (BEL5 and one of the PIM11's were lost to scratches)

[formula_2002]

Did you mean to mark Pool Land as a play? Not counting that race, I only count 5 early plays (BEL5 and one of the PIM11's were lost to scratches)

Steve, I checked the plays and the results stand as posted.
Yep, Pool Land was a play, I failed to indicate "Play".

4 of the 5 hol plays lost.

results for the day
5 wins, 10 plays $0 profit, $1304 played.


Again, as I ponited out previously, the "LAY" bets are out performing my odds lines, pinnacle's and the PUBLIC"S odds line.

All of yesterday posted plays were won by playing the "lay", albiet all four horsese in two of the races were "lays"

I've attached a tally sheet.
Joe M

[ryesteve]

4 of the 5 hol plays lost.

results for the day
5 wins, 10 plays $0 profit, $1304 played.

I don't mean to sound like an auditor, but I like playing along...
The "5 for 10" is right, but you only have 4 hol plays... so only 3 of 4 lost. But the way I'm figuring, you should've been -$82, not $0. If you went into Hollywood at +$200, you ended up losing $100 on R2 and winning $100 on R6, so that's a wash, and then you lost $167 on R4 and and $115 on R5. I think this time I got it right... if you were 5 for 10 and only won on the lay side, you couldn't have broken even.

[formula_2002]

I don't mean to sound like an auditor, but I like playing along...
The "5 for 10" is right, but you only have 4 hol plays... so only 3 of 4 lost. But the way I'm figuring, you should've been -$82, not $0. If you went into Hollywood at +$200, you ended up losing $100 on R2 and winning $100 on R6, so that's a wash, and then you lost $167 on R4 and and $115 on R5. I think this time I got it right... if you were 5 for 10 and only won on the lay side, you couldn't have broken even.

Steve, you are correct, -$82
5 wins, 10 plays $82 loss, $1304 played.
hopefully, when I run it through my data base it will agree with -$82
These humans ;)