PDA

View Full Version : O'Reilly: The future of France...


Dave Schwartz
04-05-2006, 11:45 AM
Most interesting. I'd be very interested to hear what the libs think of this article.

http://www.billoreilly.com/currentarticle

Please be aware that the above article link will change tomorrow.


Here is some content:
+++++++++

By: Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com
Thursday, Mar 30, 2006

We have seen the possible future of America—and it is France! This week thousands of young French citizens took to the streets to demand job security and more guaranteed entitlements, as if they don't already have enough.

If you get a job in France, you immediately get more than seven weeks vacation each year, and five of those weeks are guaranteed between May and October. Also, short of executing your coworkers or something, the company that hires you cannot fire you. They are stuck with you for as long as you show up.

The result of this insane labor policy is that many French companies simply will not hire young people who don't have solid references and an experienced track record. It's just too risky. So the unemployment rate for workers from 18 to 26 is an astounding 24%. Overall, French unemployment stands at 10% as opposed to less than 5% in the USA.

So, in order to encourage job expansion, the French government proposed a law that would give employers a little room. A company would be allowed to lay off anyone under the age of 26 for cause within two years of their first day on the job. After that, Jacques and Marie are almost guaranteed a lifetime job, provided the company stays solvent.

Sounds reasonable, right? How'd you like that deal?

But for the young French, this is an abomination! This is an insult! They believe they are entitled to a good job no matter how they perform. So they took to the streets.

Those of us in America who have fought our way up the employment ladder are, of course, amused by this display. And we understand that the quasi-socialism France has embraced since we freed them from the Nazis in 1945 has led to this absurd situation.

The French government is now a giant colossus that employs more than 25% of the entire French population! Paris pays for health care, provides lucrative pensions, subsidizes a lot of housing, and has set up a 35-hour work week. In fact, it is illegal in France for any company employee to work more than 44 hours a week.

GameTheory
04-05-2006, 11:52 AM
Dennis Prager also wrote something interesting about the same subject:

http://www.townhall.com/opinion/column/dennisprager/2006/03/21/190622.html

chickenhead
04-05-2006, 11:54 AM
I have seen some of the French govt types on Charlie Rose. They are pretty reasonable guys...they don't come right out and say it, but they suggest in every way they can how worried they are, they know they can't afford anything close to what has gone on in the past, they know it all has to change...but they can't seem to convince the people of this.

Tom
04-05-2006, 12:06 PM
Let them eat cake! :lol:

"The peasents are revoltimg!"
"Yes, they are!" :lol:

Hard to sympathize with Fance....just let them fail - don't even think bout a bail out. We saved thier asses one too many times already. Think of this as natural selection at work.

Indulto
04-05-2006, 03:22 PM
Hard to sympathize with Fance....just let them fail - don't even think bout a bail out. We saved thier asses one too many times already. Think of this as natural selection at work.Without job opportunities -- and like their American counterparts -- the more adventurous and physically fit young people will have to join the military.

This trend would be accelerated once the French Foreign Legion obtains a huge U.N. contract to invade Iran based on French perfume maker development of a new chemical weapon. This capability -- based on an overpowering aphrodisiac called "Sweet Surrender" -- forces troops to abandon their posts and return to their wives. Following U.S. air strikes contracted by the French perfume cartel, the Iranians would agree to an oil-for-perfume deal enabling them to receive limited quantities of antidotes that would allow afflicted men to be temporarily separated from their wives long enough for women to run the country. :lol:

Tom
04-05-2006, 03:51 PM
You made a grammatical error here...one may only use the word French in the same sentence with the word invade when it is the object of that verb!:D

Indulto
04-05-2006, 04:09 PM
You made a grammatical error here...one may only use the word French in the same sentence with the word invade when it is the object of that verb!:D:lol: :lol: :lol: