JustMissed
07-02-2002, 02:32 PM
Some of you guys and gals have been so nice to respond to my betting post I thought I would share my route handicapping with you. Most of you seem so high tech this may not interest you but I'm going to share it with you anyway.
I get the TSN pp's. For routes, after my normal contender selection process which includes throwing out losers, identifying DNCs and form darkened horses, I do the following:
With a red pencil, for the three most recent routes, I circle the highest of each E1, E2 & LP. I add these three numbers together and divided by three to get an average route pace figure. If I have, for example, two good horses, A with 81 and B with 83, I go with the highest last three speed fig. This works like a charm and also works with routes on turf except with turf I usually go with the horse that has the highest LP. I have not kept exact stats on this but I'm sure I'm hitting better than 70% and my BR is getting fatter.
Of course being a newbe, I'm probably wrong about most things, but I sincerely believe that each type of race needs to be handicapped differently, and I also believe that identifying the track bias makes it much easier to pick the winner.
I was doing sprints using internal fractions and after my eyes started to bleed, I figured I had better come up with an easier way than that(It was too much like work). I have noticed that some nights the horse in the lead at the second call seems to always win and other nights it seems like if there are two or three running together at the second call, they always seem to get beat by an P or EP horse. I'll keep you posted if I can come up with something on sprints.
By the way, I play Mountaineer on Monday and Tuesday nights, Charlestown on Thursday and Friday nights. Finger Lakes and sometime Calder on Saturday.
I also enjoy reading everyone's comments and hope you will post something-even if you disagree.
Thanks
:)
I get the TSN pp's. For routes, after my normal contender selection process which includes throwing out losers, identifying DNCs and form darkened horses, I do the following:
With a red pencil, for the three most recent routes, I circle the highest of each E1, E2 & LP. I add these three numbers together and divided by three to get an average route pace figure. If I have, for example, two good horses, A with 81 and B with 83, I go with the highest last three speed fig. This works like a charm and also works with routes on turf except with turf I usually go with the horse that has the highest LP. I have not kept exact stats on this but I'm sure I'm hitting better than 70% and my BR is getting fatter.
Of course being a newbe, I'm probably wrong about most things, but I sincerely believe that each type of race needs to be handicapped differently, and I also believe that identifying the track bias makes it much easier to pick the winner.
I was doing sprints using internal fractions and after my eyes started to bleed, I figured I had better come up with an easier way than that(It was too much like work). I have noticed that some nights the horse in the lead at the second call seems to always win and other nights it seems like if there are two or three running together at the second call, they always seem to get beat by an P or EP horse. I'll keep you posted if I can come up with something on sprints.
By the way, I play Mountaineer on Monday and Tuesday nights, Charlestown on Thursday and Friday nights. Finger Lakes and sometime Calder on Saturday.
I also enjoy reading everyone's comments and hope you will post something-even if you disagree.
Thanks
:)