highnote
07-13-2005, 11:20 AM
Are there any commercial paddock reports available, and if so, does anyone have any experience using them?
Specifically, I'd like to know how a horse looks today compared to how it looked before and after previous races.
Second, I'd like to know about it's physique -- is it built like a sprinter, a sprint/miler, a turf horse, a 10 furlong horse, etc.
When I used to do paddock handicapping I'd try to judge a horse's distance preference based on it physique. A horse like Skipaway looked like he could get anywhere from 7 furlongs to 10 furlongs on dirt. He didn't look like he'd be a good turf horse.
My Flag was a tall lanky filly that looked like she could run all day, but I doubt she would have been able to sprint 5 furlongs.
Some horses looked like the were best suited to races up to 8.5 furlongs and some looked like they would do best going over hurdles -- anyone remember Harrowman? He raced on turf, but looked like a jumper. The owner or trainer must have suspected the same thing and Harrowman went on to be a pretty good hurdler.
Specifically, I'd like to know how a horse looks today compared to how it looked before and after previous races.
Second, I'd like to know about it's physique -- is it built like a sprinter, a sprint/miler, a turf horse, a 10 furlong horse, etc.
When I used to do paddock handicapping I'd try to judge a horse's distance preference based on it physique. A horse like Skipaway looked like he could get anywhere from 7 furlongs to 10 furlongs on dirt. He didn't look like he'd be a good turf horse.
My Flag was a tall lanky filly that looked like she could run all day, but I doubt she would have been able to sprint 5 furlongs.
Some horses looked like the were best suited to races up to 8.5 furlongs and some looked like they would do best going over hurdles -- anyone remember Harrowman? He raced on turf, but looked like a jumper. The owner or trainer must have suspected the same thing and Harrowman went on to be a pretty good hurdler.