MNR - 04-26-05

[Partsnut]

Choices for win and exacta : Bet either one at 3-1 odds or better to win or both at 3-1 odds or better.

1 - 6,5 Ex. 6 with 4,5,7 Ex. 5 with 4,6,7
2 - 4,5 Ex. 4 with 2,3,5 Ex. 5 with 2,3,4
3 - 1,3 Ex. 1 with 3,8,10 Ex. 3 with 1,8,10
4 - 4,8 Ex. 4 with 3,8,10 Ex. 8 with 3,4 10
5 - 9,1 Ex. 9 with 1,8,10 Ex. 1 with 8,9,10
6 - 2,7 Ex. 2 with 6,7,9 Ex. 7 with 2,6,9
7 - 2,7 Ex. 2 with 1,3,7 Ex. 7 with 1,2,3
8 - 4,3 Ex. 4 with 1,2,3 Ex. 3 with 1,2,4
9 - 6,7 Ex. 6 with 2,7,8 Ex. 7 with 2,6,8
10 - 2,4 Ex. 2 with 1,4,7 Ex. 4 with 1,2,7

Good Luck :bang:

[abuttry]

1st-wp#6 pbx 3,6,7
2nd-wp#2 pbx 1,2,5
3rd-wp#8 pbx 1,2,8 P3 1,2,8/ 4,8,10/ 8,9,10
4th-wp#4 pbx 1,8,10
5th-wp#9 pbx 8,9,10
6th-wp#2 pbx 1,2,10 P3 1,2,10/ 3,4,6/ 1,3,4
7th-wp#3 pbx 3,4,6
8th-wp#4 pbx 1,3,4
9th-wp#5 pbx 1,2,5
10th-wp#2 pbx 2,4,8

$268-total

[Partsnut]

Looks like we're almost on the same page.

Let's see how they do.

[Partsnut]

In 10 races, making a possible 11 win bets, we Had 6 winners of which
4 were unbettable because they were under 3-1 odds.
The 2 playable winners paid $ 10.40 and $ 11.80.
So we ended up with a very short profit ( a virtual break even).
The exacta picks showed 3 exactas won at a minus ROI (less then a -20%
ROI). If I had bet my 2 win choices in each race I still would have come up short. ????????? :bang:

[Partsnut]

After reviewing the charts, I adjusted my odds cut-off number to 4-1 and
found that I would have had 9 playable contenders which would have given me a 23% ROI.
If I would have made win bets only and stayed away from the exactas I would have shown a reasonable profit.

You live and you learn. :ThmbUp: