PDA

View Full Version : California . . .


Bobby
03-11-2005, 10:10 AM
never have understood it.

I mean they let OJ off, despite the fact that his blood is at the crime scene, and his ex-wife's, that white girl, is at his home. Bloody gloves behind his house. KATO don't know a thing. The defense: the detective said the "n" word. NOT GUILTY.

then, you've got scott peterson. Nothing really compelling against him. Maybe a con man for his fling with amber Frey. But no DNA or anything. Just some phone records. GUILTY - GAS CHAMBER


Now we've got ROBERt Blake AND The KING OF POP.

Blake - Nothing really defenitive on him either. Looks like a hit job but where's the killer? It ain't Blake cause no gun powder residue on him.

Jackson - He's just a shame. I mean he walks around with his peace sign held up, wearing his trademark blazer with a arm band, getting lil kids drunk and showing em porn. kids Sleep with him in his bed. Has a damn amusement park for the kids to come over. Whadda ya think on him?

Is there any justice out there?

Equineer
03-11-2005, 10:15 AM
Bobby,

It's long been acknowledged that the hardest part of a perfect crime is luring the victims to California. :)

sq764
03-11-2005, 10:15 AM
it's easy..

MJ, OJ - Rich

Blake, Peterson - Not Rich

Welcome to the American legal system

Dan Montilion
03-11-2005, 12:49 PM
Innocent until proven poor.

Dan Montilion

46zilzal
03-11-2005, 01:15 PM
also if you have lots of $$$$$$ it is strange how one tends to get off for things that a poor slob would go to jail for.

Valuist
03-11-2005, 04:58 PM
Nothing compelling against Peterson? There was more circumstantial evidence against him than against OJ, Blake and Jackson put together. And Blake didn't have money? How about royalties for Baretta?

Bobby
03-11-2005, 05:30 PM
Why would Peterson kill his wife and baby to go to another woman and take care of someone else's kid? He probably did it, but I have some doubts. It aint "beyond a shadow of a doubt" like OJ

Tom
03-11-2005, 05:33 PM
When is it bedtime at Neverland Ranch?

When the big hand is on the little hand! :eek:

Valuist
03-11-2005, 05:46 PM
Whoever said Peterson was going to take care of somebody else's child? Just cause he was banging Amber didn't mean he was going to marry her.

He was too scared to handle the responsibities of being a parent. I don't have the energy to look up all the previous posts with mountains of evidence but there was mountains of it. I don't doubt OJ did it either, but I have doubts whether his killing was premeditated. I don't doubt that with Scottie P.

boxcar
03-12-2005, 12:57 AM
Valuist wrote:

Whoever said Peterson was going to take care of somebody else's child? Just cause he was banging Amber didn't mean he was going to marry her.

He was too scared to handle the responsibities of being a parent. I don't have the energy to look up all the previous posts with mountains of evidence but there was mountains of it. I don't doubt OJ did it either, but I have doubts whether his killing was premeditated. I don't doubt that with Scottie P.

Good points, Valuist.

What I think it all boiled down to is that Scottie loved to play around and didn't want the responsibilty of caring for his child. His only option was to divorce Lacy. But a divorce with a child? .Very expensive proposition for the next 18 years -- in the prime of his life! By murdering both of them, he figured this was his way to get out from under on the cheap.

BTW, Scott's sister thinks he's also guilty. Of course, this makes her the black sheep of the family -- even more than him! How ironic!

Boxcar

kenwoodallpromos
03-12-2005, 01:02 AM
Of the four, OJ was the only one who was not positively IDed visually as being at the scene of the alleged crime. And the witness who claimed to placed him en route from the scene was not found credible enough to testify (Shively).
The watch cap found at Nichole's was a large, same as found when cops searched OJ's cousin's house (Ron Schiff). OJ wore extra large. Ron was an ex-cop and knew Fuhrman.
Detective Luper admitted during the trial that he took a right glove out of OJ's closet and placed it by the sofa, then returned when he learned that a right glove was discovered in back. He admittedly tried to phony up evidence.
I do not know if OJ did it or not, but I do know 11 of the 12 on the jury were government workers.

Dave Schwartz
03-12-2005, 02:04 AM
Dan,

Innocent until proven poor.

Great quote.


Dave

Bobby
03-16-2005, 05:46 PM
Robert Blake - Not guilty

Can't believe it. No gun residue on his hands and it takes em 9 days.

Probably got away with the hit though

Tom
03-16-2005, 05:56 PM
If I ever want to kill somebody, I'l do it in Los Angles. They seem to be unable to convict anyone!
Mayber OJ will help him find the real killer?