sq764
01-17-2005, 12:26 AM
Just in case this got lost in another thread.. Next time you whine about Bush and the decision to go to Iraq, do not forget your Lerchy hero..
http://www.nationalreview.com/document/kerry200401261431.asp
I really like this part:
"He cannot be permitted to go unobserved and unimpeded toward his horrific objective of amassing a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction."
And this one:
"When it meets tomorrow to receive the negotiators' report and to determine its future course of action, it is vital that the Security Council treat this situation as seriously as it warrants."
"AS SERIOUSLY AS IT WARRANTS'.. what does that mean?
Oh, and this is an interesting comment:
"This should not be a strike consisting only of a handful of cruise missiles hitting isolated targets primarily of presumed symbolic value. But how long this military action might continue and how it may escalate should Saddam remain intransigent and how extensive would be its reach are for the Security Council and our allies to know and for Saddam Hussein ultimately to find out."
http://www.nationalreview.com/document/kerry200401261431.asp
I really like this part:
"He cannot be permitted to go unobserved and unimpeded toward his horrific objective of amassing a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction."
And this one:
"When it meets tomorrow to receive the negotiators' report and to determine its future course of action, it is vital that the Security Council treat this situation as seriously as it warrants."
"AS SERIOUSLY AS IT WARRANTS'.. what does that mean?
Oh, and this is an interesting comment:
"This should not be a strike consisting only of a handful of cruise missiles hitting isolated targets primarily of presumed symbolic value. But how long this military action might continue and how it may escalate should Saddam remain intransigent and how extensive would be its reach are for the Security Council and our allies to know and for Saddam Hussein ultimately to find out."