Excellent article

[Dave Schwartz]

... about the election from the inside.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6407226/site/newsweek/

[betchatoo]

Thanks Dave for posting an interesting article. I think personally I was so involved with the politics and policies that I got them mixed up with the candidates and forgot that these are actually people.

[Secretariat]

Another interesting article:

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1106-30.htm

[cj]

Originally posted by Secretariat
Another interesting article:

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1106-30.htm

Its not interesting at all, just more liberal paranoia...save yourself the time and read The Star or something similar.

[schweitz]

Originally posted by Secretariat
Another interesting article:

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1106-30.htm

Only interesting if you are delusional.

[JustRalph]

it's the same theory they propagated in their pamplets for a contested race.........Diebold has a defense in place already according to an interview with their spokesman. Dream on Sec.

[PaceAdvantage]

Is it true that the only good hackers are Republican hackers?

How come Democrats can't hack into these machines and change the votes towards their side for a change?

It's interesting that the common dreams article says the electronic voting machines worked as they SHOULD. Didn't I read a post elsewhere claiming these machines were NOT working as they should?

Who to believe?

I'll tell you one thing...some people never stop trying to tear down America from within.

Didn't they use computers to tabulate votes in 1992? I betcha they did. Therefore:

How come George Bush Sr. LOST to Bill Clinton? Bush was once head of the CIA....if anyone is gonna get someone to hack something, this is YOUR MAN!!

I suspect the voter fraud folks are shooting blanks on this one. Let them research it all they want, and gather all the evidence quietly. Only when they have PROOF should they be heard from again.