PDA

View Full Version : Clinton vs. Bush


PaceAdvantage
10-07-2004, 08:16 PM
Somone printed this out for me today...I'll duplicate some of it here....please respond if anything is false:


Clinton awards Halliburton a no-bid contract in Yugoslavia - GOOD
Bush awards Halliburton a no-bid contract in Iraq - BAD

Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia - GOOD
Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq - BAD

Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia - GOOD
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - BAD

Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists - GOOD
Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator - BAD

Clinton bombs the Chinese embassy - GOOD
Bush bombs terrorist camps - BAD

Clinton commits felonies while in office - GOOD
Bush lands on aircraft carrier in jumpsuit - BAD

No mass graves found in Serbia - GOOD
No WMD found in Iraq - BAD

Stock market crashes in 2000 under Clinton - GOOD
Economy on upswing under Bush - BAD

Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden - GOOD
World Trade Centers fall under Bush - BAD

Clinton says Saddam has nukes - GOOD
Bush says Saddam has nukes - BAD

Clinton calls for regime change in Iraq - GOOD
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - BAD

Terrorist training in Afghanistan under Clinton - GOOD
Bush destroys training camps in Afghanistan - BAD

Milosevic not yet convicted - GOOD
Saddam turned over for trial - BAD



Clinton really isn't the issue here. The issue is the interpretation of SIMILAR events.

kenwoodallpromos
10-07-2004, 10:10 PM
Clinton has heart problem- bad
Bush runs again without Clinton helping- good for Bush.

Tom
10-08-2004, 12:16 AM
WOW. Great post, PA. Can't WIT to see what spin the boys put on this one! DNC working OT tonight.


"Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia - GOOD

Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq - BAD"

Little Johnny, in the debate, said that the 15 billion Bush slotted for global aids should be double that - that comes out to 30 billion for you liberal educated amoung us. About half of the 87 billion Keryy sometimes votes for. Gee. 30 BILLION dollars for a problemt hat is not outs and for a disease that is 99.9% preventable. Why do we need a cure for something that is only spread through ignorance? I would much rather pay money for peolpe to be free than to waste money on something that basic intelligence can prevent. How much does it cost to tell the someone - Just say NO!

chickenhead
10-08-2004, 02:17 PM
I like this post a lot, because I do think it shows some of the "group think" that goes on (works both ways of course)...

Clinton commits felonies while in office - GOOD

Bush lands on aircraft carrier in jumpsuit - BAD

this one is just plain true, which is why it is so funny...

the one about no mass graves is not true...

http://www.iht.com/articles/523424.html

PaceAdvantage
10-09-2004, 04:41 AM
Originally posted by chickenhead
the one about no mass graves is not true...

http://www.iht.com/articles/523424.html

Thank you for pointing this out.

I thought this thread would get more responses....oh well.

Tom
10-09-2004, 10:50 AM
If you want to attrack vampires, don't post crosses.
If you want to attrack liberish, don't post the truth.:D

ljb
10-09-2004, 10:55 AM
Quick update to PA,
Clinton is not running this time ! :D :D :D

Tom
10-09-2004, 11:07 AM
Quick update to Ljb.
Everyone knows that.
The talk here is about the people who believe thse things, not the presidents.
It's called a philosophical discussion. You probably heard of these if you got to a lot of movies.

cj
10-09-2004, 11:07 AM
PA,

Haven't you learned, you don't get a response from the libs until they consult all the liberal web sites and find out what they are supposed to say...err...I mean what they can link to that someone else said.

http://www.pacefigures.com/images/libs.gif