PDA

View Full Version : Coulter on Edwards


JustRalph
10-07-2004, 02:25 PM
Heart Patient Outruns Ambulance Chaser
October 6, 2004

Here's what the vigilant viewer of Tuesday night's debate would have learned: You should vote for the Kerry-Edwards ticket because John Edwards' old man used to learn math off of the TV. Dear Diary: Went to a vice presidential debate Tuesday night and an "Oprah" show broke out.

Too bad Mr. Edwards didn't teach his son John that $119 billion (money actually spent on the Iraq war so far) does not equal $200 billion (money John Edwards claims has been spent on Iraq war so far), or that 700 Iraqi military deaths (actual number of Iraqi deaths in war to remove Saddam Hussein) is greater than zero (number of Iraqi deaths acknowledged by Edwards).
After Dick Cheney had beaten Edwards about the head for a while during the debate, Edwards waved his girlish hands and said: "There are 60 countries who have members of al-Qaida in them. How many of those countries are we going to invade?"

The Democrats' silver-tongued boy thought he had made a very clever point. In fact, I believe this is the first time we've gotten any Democrat to admit that the entire al-Qaida terrorist network is not living in a narrow mountainous path between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Democrats are now on the record: 60 countries harbor al-Qaida. But apparently the one nation that had managed to entirely purge itself of all al-Qaida members was Iraq – under the great statesman Saddam Hussein! Iraq is the only country in the world liberals believe was hermetically sealed from al-Qaida.

Not only would the Democrats not have attacked Iraq, they would have given Saddam Hussein an award for having so thoroughly rid his nation of al-Qaida members. (And I know these Democrats are very proud of their superior manicures, but someone should tell Edwards to keep those girlish hands down.)

When asked to comment on the Israel-Palestinian conflict during the debate Tuesday night, Edwards had another personal story:

Now, if I can, just for a moment, tell you a personal story. I was in Jerusalem a couple of years ago, actually three years ago, in August of 2001, staying at the King David Hotel. We left in the morning, headed to the airport to leave, and later in the day I found out that that same day, not far from where we were staying, the Sbarro Pizzeria was hit by a suicide bomber in Jerusalem. Fifteen people were killed. Six children were killed.

A strange psychological compulsion compels some people to inject themselves into all historic events. On cross examination, it generally turns out they were not actually in New York City on 9-11, but had visited New York a week earlier. They did not march in Selma, but knew someone who knew someone who did. They were not near the Sbarro Pizzeria, but in the same country where it happened.

John Edwards managed to turn the deadly bombing of the pizzeria into another story about himself. On the basis of his brush with death, Edwards concluded: "What are the Israeli people supposed to do? ... They have not only the right but the obligation to defend themselves." (The scariest part of the story was that Edwards just had his nails done at the manicure place next door to the pizzeria that very day!)

So are we to surmise that if Edwards had not been at the King David Hotel the day the Sbarro Pizzeria was blown up, he would not think Israel has a right to defend itself?

Cheney did not need to stay in the King David Hotel to know what to do about ruthless suicide bombers. He said: "With respect to Israel and Palestine, Gwen, the suicide bombers, in part, were generated by Saddam Hussein, who paid $25,000 to the families of suicide bombers. I personally think one of the reasons that we don't have as many suicide attacks today in Israel as we've had in the past is because Saddam's no longer in business."

Edwards lamely boasted, "I would find terrorists where they are" – but not in Iraq, the one nation miraculously free of all al-Qaida terrorists – "and stop them and kill them before they do harm to us." For some reason, Democrats always feel the need to proclaim that they would kill terrorists too – just like they must constantly proclaim their support for "the troops."

Edwards expressed his support for "the troops" by describing the brave men fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan – the war liberals claim to support – as evidence of America's decline. In his rousing closing statement – about himself again – Edwards said, "Here's the truth: I have grown up in the bright light of America." (Technically, it was the not-such-bright-lights who sit on juries that turned Edwards into a multimillionaire trial lawyer.)

"But that light is flickering today," he said. (Or is that the light from the tanning salon?) As evidence of the flickering light of America, Edwards said: "You see it when you sit at your table each night and there's an empty chair because a loved one is serving in Iraq or Afghanistan." How precisely is the Kerry-Edwards team going to "find terrorists where they are and stop them and kill them before they do harm to us" – if no one is going to be away from the dinner table doing the capturing and killing?

It's very confidence-building that the Democrats' argument for replacing the current team in the White House during a battle for America's survival is Edwards' capacity to recite the first draft of a Hallmark card inscription about flickering lights.

chickenhead
10-07-2004, 02:39 PM
that is one of the stupidest articles I've ever read.....she must have been extremely hard up to submit this piece of garbage.

kenwoodallpromos
10-07-2004, 02:55 PM
Ann took over where Buchanon left off when he turned Libertarian in attitude.

kenwoodallpromos
10-07-2004, 04:07 PM
John Edwards will host a town hall discussion Thursday on one of the most important challenges America faces today: homeland security. At the town hall, John Edwards will accept the endorsement of a number of 9/11 families and outline the Kerry-Edwards comprehensive plan to protect America’s ports, harbors, rails, subways, and chemical plants.
--Yesterday Kerry and Edwards refused to vote at all on the intelligence reorganization. Edwards also refused to vote on the Goss CIA nomination.

dav4463
10-07-2004, 04:14 PM
Ann Coulter is not stupid. The article isn't stupid.

chickenhead
10-07-2004, 04:52 PM
I have no doubt Ann is smart enough...but this article certainly doesn't bear it out. It shows really no merit whatsoever. If her purpose in this case was to write a parody of herself....then I guess the article hit it's mark.

CryingForTheHorses
10-07-2004, 05:04 PM
Originally posted by JustRalph
Heart Patient Outruns Ambulance Chaser
October 6, 2004

Here's what the vigilant viewer of Tuesday night's debate would have learned: You should vote for the Kerry-Edwards ticket because John Edwards' old man used to learn math off of the TV. Dear Diary: Went to a vice presidential debate Tuesday night and an "Oprah" show broke out.

Too bad Mr. Edwards didn't teach his son John that $119 billion (money actually spent on the Iraq war so far) does not equal $200 billion (money John Edwards claims has been spent on Iraq war so far), or that 700 Iraqi military deaths (actual number of Iraqi deaths in war to remove Saddam Hussein) is greater than zero (number of Iraqi deaths acknowledged by Edwards).
After Dick Cheney had beaten Edwards about the head for a while during the debate, Edwards waved his girlish hands and said: "There are 60 countries who have members of al-Qaida in them. How many of those countries are we going to invade?"

The Democrats' silver-tongued boy thought he had made a very clever point. In fact, I believe this is the first time we've gotten any Democrat to admit that the entire al-Qaida terrorist network is not living in a narrow mountainous path between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Democrats are now on the record: 60 countries harbor al-Qaida. But apparently the one nation that had managed to entirely purge itself of all al-Qaida members was Iraq – under the great statesman Saddam Hussein! Iraq is the only country in the world liberals believe was hermetically sealed from al-Qaida.

Not only would the Democrats not have attacked Iraq, they would have given Saddam Hussein an award for having so thoroughly rid his nation of al-Qaida members. (And I know these Democrats are very proud of their superior manicures, but someone should tell Edwards to keep those girlish hands down.)

When asked to comment on the Israel-Palestinian conflict during the debate Tuesday night, Edwards had another personal story:

Now, if I can, just for a moment, tell you a personal story. I was in Jerusalem a couple of years ago, actually three years ago, in August of 2001, staying at the King David Hotel. We left in the morning, headed to the airport to leave, and later in the day I found out that that same day, not far from where we were staying, the Sbarro Pizzeria was hit by a suicide bomber in Jerusalem. Fifteen people were killed. Six children were killed.

A strange psychological compulsion compels some people to inject themselves into all historic events. On cross examination, it generally turns out they were not actually in New York City on 9-11, but had visited New York a week earlier. They did not march in Selma, but knew someone who knew someone who did. They were not near the Sbarro Pizzeria, but in the same country where it happened.

John Edwards managed to turn the deadly bombing of the pizzeria into another story about himself. On the basis of his brush with death, Edwards concluded: "What are the Israeli people supposed to do? ... They have not only the right but the obligation to defend themselves." (The scariest part of the story was that Edwards just had his nails done at the manicure place next door to the pizzeria that very day!)

So are we to surmise that if Edwards had not been at the King David Hotel the day the Sbarro Pizzeria was blown up, he would not think Israel has a right to defend itself?

Cheney did not need to stay in the King David Hotel to know what to do about ruthless suicide bombers. He said: "With respect to Israel and Palestine, Gwen, the suicide bombers, in part, were generated by Saddam Hussein, who paid $25,000 to the families of suicide bombers. I personally think one of the reasons that we don't have as many suicide attacks today in Israel as we've had in the past is because Saddam's no longer in business."

Edwards lamely boasted, "I would find terrorists where they are" – but not in Iraq, the one nation miraculously free of all al-Qaida terrorists – "and stop them and kill them before they do harm to us." For some reason, Democrats always feel the need to proclaim that they would kill terrorists too – just like they must constantly proclaim their support for "the troops."

Edwards expressed his support for "the troops" by describing the brave men fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan – the war liberals claim to support – as evidence of America's decline. In his rousing closing statement – about himself again – Edwards said, "Here's the truth: I have grown up in the bright light of America." (Technically, it was the not-such-bright-lights who sit on juries that turned Edwards into a multimillionaire trial lawyer.)

"But that light is flickering today," he said. (Or is that the light from the tanning salon?) As evidence of the flickering light of America, Edwards said: "You see it when you sit at your table each night and there's an empty chair because a loved one is serving in Iraq or Afghanistan." How precisely is the Kerry-Edwards team going to "find terrorists where they are and stop them and kill them before they do harm to us" – if no one is going to be away from the dinner table doing the capturing and killing?

It's very confidence-building that the Democrats' argument for replacing the current team in the White House during a battle for America's survival is Edwards' capacity to recite the first draft of a Hallmark card inscription about flickering lights.

Even know Im not allowed to vote in your beautiful country, I still have a opinion.
Kerry is done!!
This Edwards guy is another joke!!
Looked like a schoolboy and the master standing there the other nite, Southern charm didnt even put a flicker of lite in that old birds eyes, Kinda looked like the eagle ready to pounce on his prey..AND that he did!! I dont care what the polls say..I think Edwards has blown the election for himself, Kerry has done lots to also flip-flop...NO WAY Kerry will win fl.

sq764
10-07-2004, 06:00 PM
Chicken, you don't like her facts?

Ahhhh, now I know why you must enjoy Kerry and Edwards speak..

My bad..

chickenhead
10-07-2004, 06:19 PM
The only 2 facts I see in this article are the very same facts that Cheney talked about in the debate....I read the transcript and watched it live....why do I need to read Ann Coulter regergitating something she heard Dick Cheney say on TV? I saw it too, Ann.

Doesn't she have anything to add on her own? Besides her ham-fisted attempts at sarcasm?

chickenhead
10-07-2004, 06:53 PM
Why don't you guys ever post anything from some actually interesting conservatives...I've been on this board 6 months now, with a bunch of conservative posters....I don't think I've seen anything from say William Buckley...a very smart and great guy.

I'll do it for you....here's some comments on presidential debate..

http://www.nationalreview.com/buckley/buckley200410011418.asp

some thoughts on how to win the war on terror..

http://www.nationalreview.com/buckley/wfb200409141444.asp

here's the whole kit and kaboodle, find time to read Ann Coulter once you've read all this......you can thank Uncle Chicken later...

http://www.nationalreview.com/buckley/buckley-archive.asp

PaceAdvantage
10-07-2004, 07:57 PM
I posted an interesting editorial from National Review the other day...did you read it chicken?

sq764
10-07-2004, 08:05 PM
Chicken, maybe, just maybe, some others have preference with legitimate writers..

but who am I to judge

chickenhead
10-07-2004, 08:51 PM
Originally posted by PaceAdvantage
I posted an interesting editorial from National Review the other day...did you read it chicken?

I did and I appreciated it...I shouldn't have said never, but I think you know what I meant....

chickenhead
10-07-2004, 08:56 PM
Originally posted by sq764
Chicken, maybe, just maybe, some others have preference with legitimate writers..

I guess you are saying that some people think Ann Coulter is a more legitimate writer than Bill Buckley (or even as legitimate).

I agree that this is true, and I pray for those poor souls every night, right after I pray for the Michael Moore fans.......

sq764
10-07-2004, 09:05 PM
Sometimes I get confused as to what side you're on..

Tom
10-08-2004, 12:28 AM
Originally posted by McSchell_Racing
Even know Im not allowed to vote in your beautiful country, I still have a opinion.
Kerry is done!!
This Edwards guy is another joke!!
Looked like a schoolboy and the master standing there the other nite, Southern charm didnt even put a flicker of lite in that old birds eyes, Kinda looked like the eagle ready to pounce on his prey..AND that he did!! I dont care what the polls say..I think Edwards has blown the election for himself, Kerry has done lots to also flip-flop...NO WAY Kerry will win fl.


Register as a democrate and they will let you vote twice!:D
Must be the exchange rate or something.

Tom
10-08-2004, 12:29 AM
Originally posted by sq764
Sometimes I get confused as to what side you're on..
There are more than two sides.

Lefty
10-08-2004, 12:38 AM
Ann is great. Trouble is she used facts against the Dems constant twisting of same facts. A very cogent and to the point article.
Tom, more than 2 sides? Does that mean you have decided to vote for Nader?

Tom
10-08-2004, 12:44 AM
If I do, it will not be a vote for Nader as much as it is a vote for thrid parties. I will mostl likely vote onll for third party candidates who have no ties to either denms or repubs.
Blindly accepting the two party system hs eveolve into oferin us Bush/Gore and now Bush Kerry as choices.
I don't consider this to be a good thing.
The growth of thrid parties must be fuled by votes to make the idea legitimate and eventually destryo thsi worhtless sytem we have today. It will take 20 years at least - 5 presidential elections.
And another major terror strike to wake up America.
9-11-01 has lost its impact on many. It took two A-bombs befroe Japan realized they werre living in a new world order.
I guess it will take two for us as well.
The political system is corrupt, screwed up, ruined. It can only be saved by purging, not restructuring. Neither party represents the people anyomore. So I will no longer suppor teither party or any incumbent at any lever ever again.