Super bowl and replays

[NY BRED]

regardless of some insane stewards discussions, all tracks(to my knowledge)
have replays to protect all participants in the race owners and the betting public.


I'm trying to understand how the butting incident was not reviewed
by the referees or protested by the Saints or even the owners of the team.


If the owners ordered their team to withdraw from the game until a replay
was again reviewed , wouldn't any "jury" vote in favor of the Saints??

If the answer is this can't happen , would the Saints automatically lose the game? If so, and this case went to court who would win??

Yeas, I'm calling for a revolution, and no I do not bet football, I have
enough issues with racing.

That said, this was a mugging played on national,maybe even international
television;it is amazing the receiver walked away without an apparent injury.

It will be interesting to see if there will be payback in the Super Bowl,
aka, what comes around, goes around....

[ultracapper]

Everybody understands it wasn't the Rams fault. A bad call went their way. It was nothing they lobbied for or probably even expected to go their way until the play was over for a second.....then 2 seconds....... then a lot of looking around the field looking for the flag.....4 seconds.....seeing if the officials are heading towards a huddle......6 seconds............HOLY YOU-KNOW-WHAT. We got away with one there. YES!!!!!!!

It would have been interesting to see what would have happened if the Saints just all went to the sidelines and said, "Hold on!! Wait a minute. What just happened there?" They would have got a delay of game. Then about 60 seconds later, the owner's box would have gotten a call from the Commissioner's office in NY, and lots of "Get your GD team out on the field or....." threats concerning 10s of thousands, if not 100s of thousands, of dollars in fines if they don't take the field NOW.

Now that would make good theater.