View Full Version : Chumpy gets sued again: Emoluments Clause
Bad News for Trump: An Emoluments Clause Lawsuit Against Him Just Had a Major Win
https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/donald-trump-emoluments-lawsuit-proceed
On Friday evening, just as he was dealing with a setback to his Supreme Court nomination, President Donald Trump got a fresh piece of unwelcome news.
According to a report in the Washington Post, federal district court judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that a lawsuit filed against the president by 200 congressional Democrats, alleging he is in violation of the Emoluments Clause of the constitution, can proceed:
"The lawsuit is based on the Constitution’s emoluments clause, which bars presidents from taking payments from foreign states. Trump’s business, which he still owns, has hosted foreign embassy events and visiting foreign officials at its downtown D.C. hotel.
The decision opens up yet another legal front for the president, who is now facing an array of inquiries into his business, his campaign and his charity.
Trump is already facing a separate emoluments suit filed by the attorneys general of Washington, D.C. and Maryland that is moving forward. In addition, he is contending with the ongoing special counsel investigation into Russian interference, a lawsuit from the New York Attorney General that alleged "persistently illegal conduct" at his charitable foundation and a defamation lawsuit brought by former "Apprentice" contestant Summer Zervos."
davew
09-29-2018, 07:59 AM
thank goodness the dims never cease their efforts to make the world a better place
Democrats, protecting truth, justice, and the Communist Way!
fast4522
09-29-2018, 08:58 AM
Democrats, protecting truth, justice, and the Communist Way!
I think there is proof in that statment.
Judging by the responses so far,It appears you gents have no idea what the Emoluments Clause is, and how it relates to the "divine rights of of King" Chump. And how many ways the king is going down.
davew
09-29-2018, 10:47 AM
Judging by the responses so far,It appears you gents have no idea what the Emoluments Clause is, and how it relates to the "divine rights of of King" Chump. And how many ways the king is going down.
I agree with this interpretation
https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/hans-bader/no-trump-did-not-violate-constitutions-emoluments-clause
Judging by the responses so far,It appears you gents have no idea what the Emoluments Clause is, and how it relates to the "divine rights of of King" Chump. And how many ways the king is going down.
I assumed it was YOU drinking some emoluments! :lol::lol:
I agree with this interpretation
https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/hans-bader/no-trump-did-not-violate-constitutions-emoluments-clauseWho cares what the con echo chamber thinks?. The suit is going forward. Lert's see what Chumpy and all the little Chump-etts think in a few months
I assumed it was YOU drinking some emoluments! :lol::lol:I knew you had no idea what you are talking about. Fact and reality-free suits you and your lack of understanding.
Hint: the Emoluments Clause is not Hillary.
boxcar
09-29-2018, 11:17 AM
Who cares what the con echo chamber thinks?. The suit is going forward. Lert's see what Chumpy and all the little Chump-etts think in a few months
And who cares what progressive commies in your party think? :rolleyes:
fast4522
09-29-2018, 11:31 AM
Judging by the responses so far,It appears you gents have no idea what the Emoluments Clause is, and how it relates to the "divine rights of of King" Chump. And how many ways the king is going down.
Yes we do, as originally intended there is no basis to negatively effect our President. As long as the constution is interpeted as intended the high court will rule in favor of President Donald J. Trump. Liberalism is not worth defending.
And who cares what progressive commies in your party think? :rolleyes:So you thing the court system is a vast left wing communist conspiracy?
Yes we do, as originally intended there is no basis to negatively effect our President. As long as the constution is interpeted as intended the high court will rule in favor of President Donald J. Trump. Liberalism is not worth defending.Sure, we should interpret the constitution using Fox news instead of the courts.
Or are you another fact-free boxcar believing the court system is a vast left wing communist conspiracy?
boxcar
09-29-2018, 12:12 PM
So you thing the court system is a vast left wing communist conspiracy?
I think the court system is stacked with a bunch of progressive judges who, LIKE YOU, believe there's a 1,001 shades of color to every law. I mean, didn't Clinton get off the hook for having classified data on her private server; and the excuse they used to not prosecute was that she had no nefarious intentions? Yet, intention is not even mentioned in the statute.
So, obviously, the DOJ/FBI, in her case, pulled a shade of interpretative color out of one of their orifices so that she could escape prosecution. (I'm thinkin' the shade of color was likely dark brown.)
Progressive judges pull the same stunts all the time. Why do you think the 9th Circus out West, where the sun sets, has a such a pathetic record of their decisions surviving in the Supreme Court? :coffee:
davew
09-29-2018, 12:33 PM
Sure, we should interpret the constitution using Fox news instead of the courts.
Or are you another fact-free boxcar believing the court system is a vast left wing communist conspiracy?
Judges are appointed by different administrations. Just because a left wing judge appointed by 0bama feels it is their job to make laws from their interpretation of the constitution, does not make it so.
I think the court system is stacked with a bunch of progressive judges who, LIKE YOU, believe there's a 1,001 shades of color to every law. I mean, didn't Clinton get off the hook for having classified data on her private server; and the excuse they used to not prosecute was that she had no nefarious intentions? Yet, intention is not even mentioned in the statute.This is not the religious thread. Any proof bunky?
BTW, laws require judges to be administered. Yes there are many circumstances that may apply to each crime. Judges play many roles. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms.
Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice.This is not biblical black/white, good versus evil. Nor communists nor sharia laws taking over our courts
boxcar
09-29-2018, 01:02 PM
This is not the religious thread. Any proof bunky?
BTW, laws require judges to be administered. Yes there are many circumstances that may apply to each crime. Judges play many roles. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms.
Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice.This is not biblical black/white, good versus evil. Nor communists nor sharia laws taking over our courts
It was well, known knowledge and the statue that applied to Clinton was even posted somewhere on this forum. Everyone knows the DOJ and the FBI used your "1,000 shades of color" to avoid indicting her. I'm sure they found a "circumstance" that was not explicitly specified in the law. This is the way muddled-headed liberals think.
And judges are not nearly as impartial as you think. Why do you think liberals shop around to find a sympathetic, comrade judge before filing suits against the opposition party? :rolleyes:
It was well, known knowledge and the statue that applied to Clinton was even posted somewhere on this forum. Everyone knows the DOJ and the FBI used your "1,000 shades of color" to avoid indicting her. I'm sure they found a "circumstance" that was not explicitly specified in the law. This is the way muddled-headed liberals think.No everyone does not know. Got a link to your conspiracy theory
And judges are not nearly as impartial as you think. Why do you think liberals shop around to find a sympathetic, comrade judge before filing suits against the opposition party? :rolleyes:All speculation and no facts or reality
Btw, there is another communist controlled emoluments clause lawsuit proceeding.
Trump is already facing a separate emoluments suit filed by the attorneys general of Washington, D.C. and Maryland that is moving forward.
And gee whiz them stinkin' commies are also.
In addition, he is contending with the ongoing special counsel investigation into Russian interference, a lawsuit from the New York Attorney General that alleged “persistently illegal conduct” at his charitable foundation and a defamation lawsuit brought by former “Apprentice” contestant Summer Zervos.
FYI, communism is pretty much dead. Fascism appears to be alive and well in Chumpy's administration and among his toadies
Originally Posted by hcap View Post
So you thing the court system is a vast left wing communist conspiracy?
The 9th Circus certainly is.
There is even a commie on the SC. Guess who she is?
OntheRail
09-29-2018, 02:27 PM
Who cares what the con echo chamber thinks?. The suit is going forward. Lert's see what Chumpy and all the little Chump-etts think in a few months
Yes in 10 days we'll be smiling at new SCJ, in 38 days we'll be laughing...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dc2JhWBXkAQ-c_z.jpg
Constant Obstruction and Anti American Actions have consequences.
The Red Tide will Rise.
boxcar
09-29-2018, 02:30 PM
No everyone does not know. Got a link to your conspiracy theory
All speculation and no facts or reality
Btw, there is another communist controlled emoluments clause lawsuit proceeding.
Trump is already facing a separate emoluments suit filed by the attorneys general of Washington, D.C. and Maryland that is moving forward.
And gee whiz them stinkin' commies are also.
In addition, he is contending with the ongoing special counsel investigation into Russian interference, a lawsuit from the New York Attorney General that alleged “persistently illegal conduct” at his charitable foundation and a defamation lawsuit brought by former “Apprentice” contestant Summer Zervos.
FYI, communism is pretty much dead. Fascism appears to be alive and well in Chumpy's administration and among his toadies
This is what liberals do. They find like-minded jurists and file lawsuits because they know their comrades will never follow the letter of the law. They know how to color the law a 1,001 shades.
And communism is a live and well. Socialism is communism-lite. Why do you think so many American communists vote for their dimwit comrades?
And, yeah, everyone does know what the controlling statue was and how it reads. I'm not going to do any homework for the willfully ignorant. (Yeah, that would be you, Humpty.)
This is what liberals do.I knewyou could not post a link.
Btw, liberals also have better arguments than you.
You never apologized for your total;ly wrong insanity about how the FBI could not and would not investigate new allegations about Kavanaugh.
Why not bunky?
boxcar
09-29-2018, 06:12 PM
I knewyou could not post a link.
Btw, liberals also have better arguments than you.
You never apologized for your total;ly wrong insanity about how the FBI could not and would not investigate new allegations about Kavanaugh.
Why not bunky?
Apologize to whom? :rolleyes: The commander-in-chief ordered it, which he is empowered to do. He's playing the dimwits like a fiddle.
Do you know what the definition of "insanity" is? So, the 7th time of doing the same ol', same ol' on Mr. K is going to produce different results than the first six, especially when they have only 7 days to come up with something? :rolleyes:
They will now that TRUMP has asked them to.
Prior to that, they said the case was closed.
Your facts have more twists in them than a pretzel.
PaceAdvantage
09-29-2018, 06:17 PM
Nobody gives two bits about a stupid EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE.
NOBODY.
Except hcap and those like him. And even they don't really care.
Apologize to whom? :rolleyes: The commander-in-chief ordered it, which he is empowered to do. He's playing the dimwits like a fiddle.
Do you know what the definition of "insanity" is? So, the 7th time of doing the same ol', same ol' on Mr. K is going to produce different results than the first six, especially when they have only 7 days to come up with something? :rolleyes:To me. You argued bull over and over again. Wrong each and every time and are not man enough to admit it. You said Chumpy would not and could not order it.
fast4522
09-29-2018, 06:42 PM
Your wasting your breath, play him a song that drives him crazy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn1eZO43w0M
Nobody gives two bits about a stupid EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE.
NOBODY.
Except hcap and those like him. And even they don't really care.Need I remind you Chumpy's sdupporters only represenrt5 a small portion of American voters. Dweindling away faster and faster. You posted a one time poll showing his approval was re-markedly stable. Then with a different poll
Lasted for a few days. 538 has a spread of over 10 points right now under water
boxcar
09-29-2018, 07:41 PM
To me. You argued bull over and over again. Wrong each and every time and are not man enough to admit it. You said Chumpy would not and could not order it.
I always maintained that the CEO of the Nation has the authority to order another FBI investigation (which when it comes right down to brass tacks will end be nothing more than another glorified background check). But without his order, nothing would or could happen legally.
Now...apologize to me for being wrong, which you always are anyway. :coffee:
davew
09-29-2018, 08:31 PM
I always maintained that the CEO of the Nation has the authority to order another FBI investigation (which when it comes right down to brass tacks will end be nothing more than another glorified background check). But without his order, nothing would or could happen legally.
Now...apologize to me for being wrong, which you always are anyway. :coffee:
when is Trump going to order another investigation into the Clinton email security breach? or are there just too many politicians involved?
Clydepuckett
09-29-2018, 11:32 PM
This might for an interesting follow for wonks like me.....several issues to be considered.
Standing. The first lawsuit by that group of nut cases was predictably thrown out for lack of standing. This case brought by the Dem Congresspersons has been deemed to attain standing by this Judge but may not survive Appelate Court on the issue. Why not?....
Damages. I can't imagine a decent argument for damages being made by this group of plaintiffs. And since there really are no case citations, precedent will not provide any background for establishment. Appelate Courts will not like that....at all. Again, what are the damages and the recourse?
Now, the better case to follow is DC and Maryland vs Trump. Standing has been granted easily and proposed damages are at least plausible. It's all political bullshit, but it could survive Appeals given the circumstance. Long shot, though. 35-1 in my handicapping.
In the end, though, I don't understand why this is deemed to threaten the President's position. These are all......ALL....civil suits....
Impeachment might be possible, I suppose. Conviction in the Senate? Not a damn chance.
ElKabong
09-29-2018, 11:49 PM
Need I remind you Chumpy's sdupporters only represenrt5 a small portion of American voters. Dweindling away faster and faster. You posted a one time poll showing his approval was re-markedly stable. Then with a different poll
Lasted for a few days. 538 has a spread of over 10 points right now under water
If you'd ever been intimate with a woman (debatable) you'd know *timing* is everything. Trump understands that much. He doesn't poll well, but apparently he gets the needed votes when kickoff comes around.
He doesn't sweat polls. He leaves that to people like you. He closes on deals, not the mid game. A good lesson you could learn from btw.
I always maintained that the CEO of the Nation has the authority to order another FBI investigation (which when it comes right down to brass tacks will end be nothing more than another glorified background check). But without his order, nothing would or could happen legally.
Now...apologize to me for being wrong, which you always are anyway. :coffee:As I thought your alzheimers prevents you from remembering the pages I spent correcting you on the FBI. You said nothing about the "CEO of a nation". If so, link to your post were you did.
If you'd ever been intimate with a woman (debatable) you'd know *timing* is everything. Trump understands that much. He doesn't poll well, but apparently he gets the needed votes when kickoff comes around.
He doesn't sweat polls. He leaves that to people like you. He closes on deals, not the mid game. A good lesson you could learn from btw.Trump's "intimacy" like of being accrued of sexual harassment by over 16 woman, and lawsuits by 2 will definitely affect the midterms whethewr he believes in polls or not. He only won the 2016 election by approx 80,000 votes swinging about 3 states in the electoral college, and lost the popular vote by close to 3 million.
Of course it is still an open question to how many of those 80,000 the Russians manipulated. Thed Kavanaugh hearings have only made most women more antp-Trump and anti-rethug.
YOU ARE CORRECT, HE AND THE RETHUGS ARE NOT POLLING TOO WELL TO SAY THE LEAST.
chadk66
09-30-2018, 08:00 AM
Judging by the responses so far,It appears you gents have no idea what the Emoluments Clause is, and how it relates to the "divine rights of of King" Chump. And how many ways the king is going down.nah we’re just tired of the daily dog and pony show you put on lol. Most have quit even concerning ourselves with your wet dreams :pound:
nah we’re just tired of the daily dog and pony show you put on lol. Most have quit even concerning ourselves with your wet dreams :pound:So you think the constitution is a dog and pony show?
The only wet dreams is Chumpy and all the little Cumpettes cleaning up from all the conflicts of interests they did not divest from, like all other previews administrations had the honesty and integrity to do. I guess all the true conservatives died with Antonin Scalia and his penchant for adhering to the constitution.
Trump's "intimacy" like of being accrued of sexual harassment by over 16 woman, and lawsuits by 2 will definitely affect the midterms whether he believes in polls or not. He only won the 2016 election by approx 80,000 votes swinging about 3 states in the electoral college, and lost the popular vote by close to 3 million.
Of course it is still an open question to how many of those 80,000 the Russians manipulated. The Kavanaugh hearings have only made most women more antp-Trump and anti-rethug.
YOU ARE CORRECT, HE AND THE RETHUGS ARE NOT POLLING TOO WELL TO SAY THE LEAST.Btw,
Republicans fear political fallout from Kavanaugh turmoil
https://apnews.com/f14eaaf9cedb4074b23a024bd93277b9/Republicans-fear-political-fallout-from-Kavanaugh-turmoil
NEW YORK (AP) — Whether or not Republicans ultimately confirm President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, some on the front lines of the GOP’s midterm battlefield fear the party may have already lost.
In the days after a divided nation watched Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser Christine Blasey Ford deliver conflicting stories about what happened when they were teenagers, Republican campaign operatives acknowledged this is not the fight they wanted six weeks before Election Day.
So you think the constitution is a dog and pony show?
No, YOU are.
What YOU have to say.....NFC.
boxcar
09-30-2018, 02:10 PM
To me. You argued bull over and over again. Wrong each and every time and are not man enough to admit it. You said Chumpy would not and could not order it.
I might have said, he wouldn't but I never said he couldn't. I said the Senate couldn't. The FBI, for your info, answers directly to the Executive Branch of government.
boxcar
09-30-2018, 02:14 PM
As I thought your alzheimers prevents you from remembering the pages I spent correcting you on the FBI. You said nothing about the "CEO of a nation". If so, link to your post were you did.
"CEO of the Nation" = president of U.S. = Trump. I have always maintained that he has the authority to order a federal investigation.
I might have said, he wouldn't but I never said he couldn't. I said the Senate couldn't. The FBI, for your info, answers directly to the Executive Branch of government.You do not remember your nonsense bunky
You did not even know the difference between a background investigation performed routinely by the FBI and a FBI criminal investigation. Nor did you know the Thomas, Anita Hill confirmation hearing was a direct precedent for re-opening a B.I. when new info came in.
Save the BS for someone else.
Save the BS for someone else.
Yeah, Boxcar, He has more than enough of his own.:lol:
Originally Posted by hcap View Post
As I thought your alzheimers prevents
Totally low class comment - you should be ashamed of yourself. If you had an dignity you would apologize.
But you don't.
Totally low class comment - you should be ashamed of yourself. If you had an dignity you would apologize.
But you don't.Why is that? Box forgets often what he had said as do you and your insults and trolling.
Jealous?
Why is that? Box forgets often what he had said as do you and your insults and trolling.
Jealous?
Double down on obnoxious - you are a disgusting person.
You have absolutely no redeeming qualities.
Double down on obnoxious - you are a disgusting person.
You have absolutely no redeeming qualities.Do you know how to spell...........
https://i.imgflip.com/zviq8.jpg
davew
09-30-2018, 06:15 PM
So you think the constitution is a dog and pony show?
.
The dims sure do, when it is convenient for them. But then again, it is only a matter of time.
PaceAdvantage
09-30-2018, 06:39 PM
Btw,
Republicans fear political fallout from Kavanaugh turmoil
https://apnews.com/f14eaaf9cedb4074b23a024bd93277b9/Republicans-fear-political-fallout-from-Kavanaugh-turmoil
NEW YORK (AP) — Whether or not Republicans ultimately confirm President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, some on the front lines of the GOP’s midterm battlefield fear the party may have already lost.
In the days after a divided nation watched Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser Christine Blasey Ford deliver conflicting stories about what happened when they were teenagers, Republican campaign operatives acknowledged this is not the fight they wanted six weeks before Election Day.Wait, WHAT?
I thought Republicans were already dead and buried because of Trump period?
How many tales do you intend to weave here, exactly?
Wait, WHAT?
I thought Republicans were already dead and buried because of Trump period?
How many tales do you intend to weave here, exactly?How many times do I have to hear hear Trump is not Hillary exactly?
OntheRail
10-01-2018, 03:34 AM
How many times do I have to hear hear Trump is not Hillary exactly?
Six more years worth... so at least a few thousand more times would be my guess.
Heary Heary... Trump's not Hillary. :pound:
Six more years worth... so at least a few thousand more times would be my guess.
Heary Heary... Trump's not Hillary. :pound:I doubt he will make it past being the worst one term preznit in history.
More likely the worst 3 year preznit in history. :pound::pound:
Never seen a dog with so many bones.
Never seen a dog with so many bones.Keep looking
http://ep.yimg.com/ay/villagestreetwear/presidential-election-2016-bone-shaped-dog-bone-chew-toy-featuring-donald-trump-dog-bone-and-hillary-clinton-72.jpg
PaceAdvantage
10-01-2018, 02:21 PM
What a cottage industry.
cordoba
10-01-2018, 06:03 PM
Wait, WHAT?
I thought Republicans were already dead and buried because of Trump period?
How many tales do you intend to weave here, exactly?
https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.9oc8VHMktLEHXcGHvgOh4gHaIp&pid=15.1&P=0&w=300&h=300
chadk66
10-01-2018, 07:59 PM
I believe there will be no republican women that bail on the Republicans due to Ms. Ford. But i do believe many republicans, men and women, will bail on the republicans if he isn't sworn in by election day.
I believe there will be no republican women that bail on the Republicans due to Ms. Ford. But i do believe many republicans, men and women, will bail on the republicans if he isn't sworn in by election day.Wrong thread.
Wrong thread.
Never stops YOU.
Never stops YOU.You are never on topic Mr.Troll. This is the thread shaming Chumpy and the Chumpettes for lining their pockets while attempting to kick start the "Divine Rights of Kings"
I seem to remember a revolutionary war was fought against George III. I thought all along he was the last King to pad his pockets at our expense. I guess not. King Donald the turd is attempting to reinstate the "Divine Rights of Kings"
OntheRail
10-02-2018, 01:32 PM
You are never on topic Mr.Troll. This is the thread shaming Chumpy and the Chumpettes for lining their pockets while attempting to kick start the "Divine Rights of Kings"
I seem to remember a revolutionary war was fought against George III. I thought all along he was the last King to pad his pockets at our expense. I guess not. King Donald the turd is attempting to reinstate the "Divine Rights of Kings"
Your a funny gal... Trump lining his pockets right....:pound:
Takes no Salary... from US.
Personal wealth down since becoming President.
Your smack is weak...:liar::liar:
But your right Trump does occupy, rule and dominates a dark mass... your mind.
Your a funny gal... Trump lining his pockets right....:pound:
Takes no Salary... from US.
Personal wealth down since becoming President.
Your smack is weak...:liar::liar:
But your right Trump does occupy, rule and dominates a dark mass... your mind.Since we do not have access to his tax returns, how do you know his "Personal wealth down since becoming President"?
wisconsin
10-02-2018, 02:43 PM
Since we do not have access to his tax returns, how do you know his "Personal wealth down since becoming President"?
Where do your tax returns show your net worth?
Where do your tax returns show your net worth?
This.
:popcorn:
OntheRail
10-02-2018, 06:23 PM
Since we do not have access to his tax returns, how do you know his "Personal wealth down since becoming President"?
One year after taking office, President Donald Trump’s fortune is down an estimated $400 million to $3.1 billion on the latest Forbes World’s Billionaires list.
Source Forbes.... :coffee:
Source Forbes.... :coffee:How detailed is the report? Does it include Russian real estate deals? And probable connection to Russian mobsters?
HE proved it.
Debate over.
Unless YOU can prove your baseless accusations.
(before you do, google "prove" and check what it means)
Where do your tax returns show your net worth?Tax returns over the last 5-10 years at least indicate money laundering that has been linked to banks that have financed Trump when no other sources would.
Records of the Trump foundation NOW being investigated by the special council, and the Southern District of New York, and the attorney general of NY may tell us just how corrupt he really is
Tax returns over the last 5-10 years at least indicate money laundering that has been linked to banks that have financed Trump when no other sources would.
What lines?
HE proved it.
Debate over.
Unless YOU can prove your baseless accusations.
(before you do, google "prove" and check what it means)Not over yet. Not over till the fat ass orange man sings like all the others that have been indicted and are singing tunes to the authorities.
OK, you CAN't prove your baseless accusations.
Didn't think so,
OK, you CAN't prove your baseless accusations.
Didn't think so,Take your head out of the sand. Various investigations are closing in. And after the midterms Trump will be crying more than you toady Cump-ettes
OK, you CAN't prove your baseless accusations.
Didn't think so,Try this for starters
Trump Engaged in Suspect Tax Schemes
as He Reaped Riches From His Father
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-tax-schemes-fred-trump.html
.................................................. ..
THEN GO TO THIS...
Trump's long and winding history with Deutsche Bank could now be at the center of Robert Mueller's investigation
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-deutsche-bank-mueller-2017-12
Deutsche Bank is receiving renewed attention after reports that US investigators asked the bank for information on accounts held by the president, his family, and associates.
Trump's relationship with the massive German bank dates back roughly 20 years and has taken many twists and turns. Now, that relationship could find itself at the center of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
The president's association with the German bank was born in the late 1990s, when major Wall Street firms would no longer loan Trump money following a series of disastrous ventures such as the Trump Shuttle and Trump's Atlantic City casinos.
THEN GO TO THIS...
.........................................
Craig Unger: Donald Trump Would Not Be President Without The Russian Mafia
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/07/21/craig_unger_donald_trump_would_not_be_president_wi thout_the_russian_mafia.html
https://youtu.be/BkE3z8DYEhI
davew
10-03-2018, 08:07 AM
Where do your tax returns show your net worth?
for dims, 'personal wealth' encompasses factors that go well beyond dollars ... it also includes like-ability by your cult and protesting friends, entitlements from your government, and future unearned resources given to you.
I wonder if the NY AG will find Trump had any 'intent' to break local, state and federal laws?
#WINNING!
What a week for truth, justice, and the American way!
Tonight's debate can be used as a pity party.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/07/politics/emoluments-lawsuit-
trump/index.html
Sorry, hcap, but it was only a matter of time! :pound::pound::pound:
boxcar
02-07-2020, 12:24 PM
#WINNING!
What a week for truth, justice, and the American way!
Tonight's debate can be used as a pity party.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/07/politics/emoluments-lawsuit-
trump/index.html
Sorry, hcap, but it was only a matter of time! :pound::pound::pound:
Poor 'cappy just can't win by sticking with the party who has given new meaning to the definition of losing.
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.