PDA

View Full Version : Carlos Dangers laptop release


JustRalph
12-30-2017, 06:45 PM
https://hotair.com/archives/2017/12/30/lot-just-porn-carlos-dangers-laptop/

Classified docs........

Lying by multiple individuals to the FBI

Double standard for Dems with the FBI

davew
12-30-2017, 07:00 PM
It is too bad Abedin and Cheryl Mills were given an immunity deal - maybe they can find some other laws they broke

woodtoo
12-30-2017, 10:12 PM
immunity can be pulled.

Saratoga_Mike
12-30-2017, 10:29 PM
immunity can be pulled.

Issa said they were given transactional immunity, which is ironclad.

davew
12-30-2017, 10:35 PM
Issa said they were given transactional immunity, which is ironclad.

But doesn't only refer to what they were asked when giving testimony? Surely they can find some other laws they broke?

Fager Fan
12-31-2017, 09:48 AM
It is too bad Abedin and Cheryl Mills were given an immunity deal - maybe they can find some other laws they broke

Someone should be asking why they were given immunity? I thought at the time it smelled to high heaven, that it smelled of protecting both of them.

chadk66
12-31-2017, 10:15 AM
The FBI gave them immunity to protect them. They know Hillary is protected. They wanted to protect her underlings. I think if and when somebody finally blows the lid off the upper echelon of the FBI it's going to be the most amazing thing we have ever seen.

chadk66
12-31-2017, 10:16 AM
On another note, we should all be donating money to Judicial Watch. They are relentless it appears.

Tom
12-31-2017, 10:31 AM
JW is doing work that the DOJ and FBI will not do.
Nice to see someone out there is worthwhile.

classhandicapper
12-31-2017, 02:05 PM
The FBI is turning out to be the most corrupt institution of all. It's disgusting to me how all these horribly corrupt human beings are all protecting each other and so far getting way with it. Much the FBI leadership and the entire Clinton circle should be in jail for a wide variety of things.

delayjf
12-31-2017, 02:24 PM
The FBI gave them immunity to protect them.

Anybody please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong - but I believe if they have immunity then they can be compelled to testify without fear of prosecution. If they then lie under oath and it can be proven, then those charges would be out side the scope of their immunity.

Tom
12-31-2017, 04:04 PM
Anybody please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong - but I believe if they have immunity then they can be compelled to testify without fear of prosecution. If they then lie under oath and it can be proven, then those charges would be out side the scope of their immunity.

That is my understanding, but the laws in this country do not apply to everyone.
$$$ talks louder than laws.

chadk66
12-31-2017, 05:09 PM
laws don't apply to the Clintons or their ilk. we all know that :rant: