View Full Version : Ex CIA Director calls for a Coup
delayjf
07-25-2017, 09:35 AM
Is this sedition? Looks like they are in bed with liberals, and this also tells me they have nothing on Trump, or no doubt they would have indicted Trump prior to him taking office. I find his statements incredible.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-24/former-cia-director-calls-coup-if-trump-fires-mueller
woodtoo
07-25-2017, 09:58 AM
Uniparty (Deep State) will stop at NOTHING to oust PDJT !!
Billions of dollars are at stake.
chadk66
07-25-2017, 11:19 AM
Over the next 3.5 years we are going to find out that D.C. is far more corrupt than anyone imagined. And just how deep it runs. Armed civil war isn't that far off now I don't believe. Didn't figure I'd see it in my lifetime but now I don't have much doubt.
ElKabong
07-25-2017, 11:53 AM
Over the next 3.5 years we are going to find out that D.C. is far more corrupt than anyone imagined. And just how deep it runs. Armed civil war isn't that far off now I don't believe. Didn't figure I'd see it in my lifetime but now I don't have much doubt.
The only resemblance of an armed civil war was what we saw on a DC baseball diamond involving a lone gunman. A guy who was down on his luck, no job, failed marriage, a guy who was obsessed with the state of politics in his feeble mind, his life in shambles and no way to fix himself.... So he shoots at some politicians he took offense to in regards of their stances on issues.
Every one else is too civil. Only nut cases even think of a civil war or succession ( here in Texas we had some years ago. None made sense)
I think it was JR that said as long as people have a full fridge and cable tv all will be static. People are too settled into their lifestyle to exact change. I'd have to agree with that
We have this thing called elections. That's how change comes about.
_______
07-25-2017, 03:05 PM
Is this sedition? Looks like they are in bed with liberals, and this also tells me they have nothing on Trump, or no doubt they would have indicted Trump prior to him taking office. I find his statements incredible.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-24/former-cia-director-calls-coup-if-trump-fires-mueller
I love how when a website mischarecterizes a statement, that mischarecterization becomes the headline here.
First off, Donald Trump can't directly fire Mueller. He has to have someone in the Justice Department do that. Normally, a President would ask the Attorney General to follow through. But since Sessions has recused himself, he can't. It would next fall on Deputy Attorney General Ron Rosenstein.
Brennan expressed a hope that those in the nominally independent Justice Department would refuse such an order.
During Watergate, Nixon asked Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire special prosecutor Archibald Cox. He resigned rather than carry out the order. Next in line was Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelschause who also resigned rather than carry out what he viewed as an illegal order from the President. It finally fell on Solicitor General Robert Bork (yep...that Robert Bork) to fire Cox.
OMG WE ALREADY HAD A COUP IN THIS COUNTRY!!!
This is what happens when lazy people don't bother learnin' no history. They fall for crap like zerohedge.
jms62
07-25-2017, 03:07 PM
I love how when a website mischarecterizes a statement, that mischarecterization becomes the headline here.
First off, Donald Trump can't directly fire Mueller. He has to have someone in the Justice Department do that. Normally, a President would ask the Attorney General to follow through. But since Sessions has recused himself, he can't. It would next fall on Deputy Attorney General Ron Rosenstein.
Brennan expressed a hope that those in the nominally independent Justice Department would refuse such an order.
During Watergate, Nixon asked Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire special prosecutor Archibald Cox. He resigned rather than carry out the order. Next in line was Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelschause who also resigned rather than carry out what he viewed as an illegal order from the President. It finally fell on Solicitor General Robert Bork (yep...that Robert Bork) to fire Cox.
OMG WE ALREADY HAD A COUP IN THIS COUNTRY!!!
This is what happens when lazy people don't bother learnin' no history. They fall for crap like zerohedge.
Sharp post :ThmbUp:
chadk66
07-25-2017, 03:10 PM
The only resemblance of an armed civil war was what we saw on a DC baseball diamond involving a lone gunman. A guy who was down on his luck, no job, failed marriage, a guy who was obsessed with the state of politics in his feeble mind, his life in shambles and no way to fix himself.... So he shoots at some politicians he took offense to in regards of their stances on issues.
Every one else is too civil. Only nut cases even think of a civil war or succession ( here in Texas we had some years ago. None made sense)
I think it was JR that said as long as people have a full fridge and cable tv all will be static. People are too settled into their lifestyle to exact change. I'd have to agree with that
We have this thing called elections. That's how change comes about.I think the tide is changing in a hell of a hurry.
Clocker
07-25-2017, 03:44 PM
First off, Donald Trump can't directly fire Mueller. He has to have someone in the Justice Department do that. Normally, a President would ask the Attorney General to follow through. But since Sessions has recused himself, he can't. It would next fall on Deputy Attorney General Ron Rosenstein.
Under DOJ regulations, but not under law, a special counsel can only be fired by the AG or the next Deputy AG in line if the AG has recused himself. Yes, normally that would be the process.
The president has the power to fire any AG or DAG who refused such an order. The president also has the power to rescind any regulation of any agency under him, including this one. So worst case, Trump could rescind the regulation and then fire the prosecutor.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/13/can-the-president-fire-special-counsel-robert-mueller-and-then-what/?utm_term=.a2cdf8ada250 (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2017/06/13/can-the-president-fire-special-counsel-robert-mueller-and-then-what/?utm_term=.a2cdf8ada250)
Nutz and Boltz
07-25-2017, 05:20 PM
Armed civil war isn't that far off now I don't believe. Didn't figure I'd see it in my lifetime but now I don't have much doubt.
Too bad Rod Serling is no longer around, would make a good Twilight Zone episode.:rolleyes: Be real, will you !
reckless
07-25-2017, 05:22 PM
Is traitor John Brennan a Muslim now? I think so.
Didn't Muslim traitor John Brennan vote for the Communist Party a few times in the 1970s. I think so.
But even if the two things I just mentioned about is 100 per cent incorrect (it isn't, btw) traitor John Brennan committed treason many times during his tenure, but most likely during the Presidential campaign of 2016, and later during the transition.
fast4522
07-25-2017, 06:08 PM
Is this sedition? Looks like they are in bed with liberals, and this also tells me they have nothing on Trump, or no doubt they would have indicted Trump prior to him taking office. I find his statements incredible.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-24/former-cia-director-calls-coup-if-trump-fires-mueller
Not everyone is of the One World Order mindset, President Trump's policy and tone scares people who are of or close to that mindset. These globalists will fight tooth and nail because many of them have handsome portfolios pointing to globalist views. The blue collar voter turned out better for populist ideas and President Trump and stunned half of the country. These folks are willing to go all the way up to sedition, but the vast majority are millionaires who backed Hillary Clinton.
fast4522
07-25-2017, 06:17 PM
Is traitor John Brennan a Muslim now? I think so.
Didn't Muslim traitor John Brennan vote for the Communist Party a few times in the 1970s. I think so.
But even if the two things I just mentioned about is 100 per cent incorrect (it isn't, btw) traitor John Brennan committed treason many times during his tenure, but most likely during the Presidential campaign of 2016, and later during the transition.
Realistic use of the word treason needs to be in context within declared war, I am not always correct so look for correction to be fair. Everyone is frustrated to use words people can not be charged with in a court, asshole fits more that many depictions and is often spot on.
newtothegame
07-25-2017, 06:46 PM
The only resemblance of an armed civil war was what we saw on a DC baseball diamond involving a lone gunman. A guy who was down on his luck, no job, failed marriage, a guy who was obsessed with the state of politics in his feeble mind, his life in shambles and no way to fix himself.... So he shoots at some politicians he took offense to in regards of their stances on issues.
Every one else is too civil. Only nut cases even think of a civil war or succession ( here in Texas we had some years ago. None made sense)
I think it was JR that said as long as people have a full fridge and cable tv all will be static. People are too settled into their lifestyle to exact change. I'd have to agree with that
We have this thing called elections. That's how change comes about.
That's only providing elections are on the up and up. (you know the illegals and parties basically stealing elections from their own).....
mostpost
07-25-2017, 07:57 PM
Uniparty (Deep State) will stop at NOTHING to oust PDJT !!
Billions of dollars are at stake.
Definition.
Deep State: A term used by the unintelligent to describe something that does not exist, except in their fevered imaginations.
fast4522
07-25-2017, 08:16 PM
Definition.
Deep State: A term used by the unintelligent to describe something that does not exist, except in their fevered imaginations.
People will be fired, what you believe will be turned upside down and as an old man in his golden years you will cry like a spoiled child.
delayjf
07-25-2017, 08:43 PM
Under DOJ regulations, but not under law, a special counsel can only be fired by the AG or the next Deputy AG in line if the AG has recused himself. Yes, normally that would be the process.
The president has the power to fire any AG or DAG who refused such an order. The president also has the power to rescind any regulation of any agency under him, including this one. So worst case, Trump could rescind the regulation and then fire the prosecutor.
This is what happens when lazy people don't bother learnin' no history. They fall for crap like zerohedge.
And that concludes the lesson for the day.
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.