Final Summary of the second test of the XYZ system to date

[Bill Cullen]

100 plays

19 winners (4.80, 8.80, 6.00, 30.40, 3.80, 5.80, 4.40, 9.60, 29.00, 3.60, 9.80, 6.80, 20.60, 6.00, 9.00, 8.20, 11.60, 4.80, 11.60)

$200.00 wagered

$194.60 returned

[jk3521]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoMoTxq4p-M :D

[green80]

you hit 19% and lose about 3%. Am I missing something here?

[Bill Cullen]

you hit 19% and lose about 3%. Am I missing something here?

The typical take out is a good 20% because of rounding and breakage.

Losing 3% when you're not using an odds filter is not bad at all.

The first test also had 19% winners but a 33% positive ROI.

Anyone even remotely familiar with testing the results of thoroughbred handicapping could tell at a glance at the two sets of winning prices that a 4/1 odds filter would be profitable for both sets.

Based on these two tests of the XYZ system done here at PA plus my own initial research, I have never seen a system as good as this one and I've tested hundreds of them over several decades.

Am I going to get rich using this system? I don't think so. I'm certainly not quitting my day job.

I hope to use it to spot longshots in the contests. In 2010, 2012 and 2013 I won my way in to the HPWS. I hope to maybe get in this or a few other contests again before I depart this earth.

I will reiterate what I said in an earlier thread: if anyone wants to talk to me about the system, then they can email me or send me a private message.

Also, don't forget: I have that other fellow who's doing a 500 race sample test of the GTC system. If the ROI is less that 5% positive, then I will spill the beans about the GTC system.

Be well.

Bill C