View Full Version : Dirty Harry announces retirement
Clocker
03-27-2015, 11:14 AM
Harry Reid says that he will not run for reelection next year. Reid told a NY Times reporter “I want to be able to go out at the top of my game”
A little late for that Harry. Missed it by about a decade or two. :D
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/28/us/politics/senator-harry-reid-retire.html?partner=socialflow&smid=tw-nytimes
When he was at the top of his game, he could look and see George Bush's butt!
Wassup, Harry, tired of ruining the nation?
Being the Bastard of NO getting to hard for you?
On a personal note, I hope your retirement is miserable and finds you in poor health and loss of mental facilities.
Not that there is much to lose to begin with, your stinking bastard!
Greyfox
03-27-2015, 11:53 AM
When he was at the top of his game, he could look and see George Bush's butt!
Wassup, Harry, tired of ruining the nation?
Being the Bastard of NO getting to hard for you?
On a personal note, I hope your retirement is miserable and finds you in poor health and loss of mental facilities.
Not that there is much to lose to begin with, your stinking bastard!
Why are you showering him with so much love? ;)
Marshall Bennett
03-27-2015, 12:05 PM
One less throw-back commie pinko in government.:ThmbUp:
Shemp Howard
03-27-2015, 12:12 PM
Chuck Schumer has already been anointed his successor.
Wall Street doing hand-stands. His cousin Amy telling dirt jokes.
Clocker
03-27-2015, 12:19 PM
One political writer's fond memories of Harry at the top of his game.
By any objective measure, Reid has been a blight on the Senate and on Congress. He declared the Iraq war “lost” while Americans were still fighting there, and he derailed a budget process that had worked well before his ascent into leadership. He stripped the Senate of one of its debate functions after sabotaging the amendment process, and nearly destroyed regular order. On top of that, Reid used his post to commit McCarthyite character assassination of Mitt Romney, claiming to have inside knowledge that Romney hadn’t paid taxes in ten years, a smear that turned out to be utterly false. He has been a malevolent force for years in American politics, and nothing he did in Washington will improve the place as much as his leaving it.
Goodbye, Harry, and good riddance.
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/03/27/breaking-harry-reid-to-retire/
He was a liar, a thief, a cheat, and he never put AMerica ahead of himself or his personal interests. The scumbag belongs in prison, or better, facing a firing squad.
This is the bottom feeding filth we need to find and run out of the country.
His entire life was a huge negative for the US. We went to war with nicer people.
thaskalos
03-27-2015, 12:41 PM
He was a liar, a thief, a cheat, and he never put AMerica ahead of himself or his personal interests. The scumbag belongs in prison, or better, facing a firing squad.
What other type of politician is there?
johnhannibalsmith
03-27-2015, 01:25 PM
Please Boxcar's Lord let this prick get hit with an indictment soon.
badcompany
03-27-2015, 02:14 PM
Chuck Schumer has already been anointed his successor.
From Dingy Harry to Chucky Schmucky.
classhandicapper
03-27-2015, 02:32 PM
Schmuck Schumer
Chuck killed a man in Long Islands once.
The fool got between Chuckie and a TV camera.
It was awful.
davew
03-27-2015, 03:39 PM
I am happy for Harry, and hope he can have a nice retirement on his accumulated $7 million from government service. It is too bad about his eye, but I will always wonder if it was a beatdown. Now he can devote all of his time to do whatever - I am not sure if he will be able to get much done, as he seems to have troubles making decisions on what to do next - or at least he did when he had a couple hundred bills on his desk from the house.
boxcar
03-27-2015, 03:44 PM
One less throw-back commie pinko in government.:ThmbUp:
Unfortunately, there are still plenty waiting in the wings and chompin' at the bit to get into that spotlight.
I am happy for Harry, and hope he can have a nice retirement on his accumulated $7 million from government service. It is too bad about his eye, but I will always wonder if it was a beatdown. Now he can devote all of his time to do whatever - I am not sure if he will be able to get much done, as he seems to have troubles making decisions on what to do next - or at least he did when he had a couple hundred bills on his desk from the house.
Can't be a beat down - f you were punching him in the face, is there any power on Earth that would make you stop? :lol:
_______
03-27-2015, 07:25 PM
I wonder if this changes Gov. Sandoval's mind about not running.
He would be odds on if he does.
HUSKER55
03-27-2015, 07:52 PM
Now we can watch harry rot to the rules he made
fast4522
03-27-2015, 10:48 PM
He will be working for the casino's next.
He was a liar, a thief, a cheat, and he never put AMerica ahead of himself or his personal interests. The scumbag belongs in prison, or better, facing a firing squad.
This is the bottom feeding filth we need to find and run out of the country.
His entire life was a huge negative for the US. We went to war with nicer people.
Yeah,If only he were more like these Honorable and Virtuous Statesmen.Cicero and Pericles :rolleyes:
Clocker
03-28-2015, 02:03 AM
Yeah,If only he were more like these Honorable and Virtuous Statesmen.Cicero and Pericles :rolleyes:
Harry Reid is either an honorable man or he is not. Those of us that consider that to be important don't grade on a curve. What Boehner and McConnell are or aren't doesn't change the fact that Reid is a political hack and a cheap whore.
I have no use for either party. McConnell is a hack. I think that Boehner is limited as a leader, but he is honorable to his core beliefs.
Spiderman
03-28-2015, 09:22 AM
Harry Reid is either an honorable man or he is not. Those of us that consider that to be important don't grade on a curve. What Boehner and McConnell are or aren't doesn't change the fact that Reid is a political hack and a cheap whore.
I have no use for either party. McConnell is a hack. I think that Boehner is limited as a leader, but he is honorable to his donors beliefs.
FTFY
Harry Reid is either an honorable man or he is not. Those of us that consider that to be important don't grade on a curve. What Boehner and McConnell are or aren't doesn't change the fact that Reid is a political hack and a cheap whore.
I have no use for either party. McConnell is a hack. I think that Boehner is limited as a leader, but he is honorable to his core beliefs.
Very interesting.So John Boehner the fellow "affectionately" known on the beltway as "tollbooth John" "bag-man John" and "K-street John" is actually an honorable man. My goodness I have been mislead.I have seen multiple reports from right and left sources chronicling his greed corruption and abject servility to finance capital.Clearly these attempts to besmirch his character result from this paragon of virtue's steadfast adherence to his core values.
http://lastresistance.com/4270/judicial-watchs-ten-wanted-corrupt-politicians-2013/
http://conservativetribune.com/boehner-busted-corruption-scandal-1/
http://freedombunker.com/2012/12/06/why-boehner-needs-to-go-hes-a-drunk-corrupt-and-cheats-on-his-wife/
http://nation.foxnews.com/nancy-pelosi/2011/11/14/60-minutes-exposes-pelosi-corruption
http://www.examiner.com/article/did-john-boehner-really-pass-out-tobacco-bribe-checks-on-the-house-floor
Clocker
03-28-2015, 11:05 AM
I guess I have to concede that all that stuff about Boehner proves that Dirty Harry is an honorable man.
davew
03-28-2015, 11:14 AM
I guess I have to concede that all that stuff about Boehner proves that Dirty Harry is an honorable man.
No he isn't - total left wing deflection crap - he is in judicial watches 10 most corrupt list, along with many of his DEM friends
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-announces-list-of-washingtons-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-for-2013/#story9
ArlJim78
03-28-2015, 11:18 AM
I'll refrain from giving my real opinion of dingy Harry, suffice to say rarely has there been a more despicable person in public life. a total hack, corrupt and a liar extraordinaire. he made a mockery of the senate under his "leadership". he won't be missed when he saunters off to work on his cowboy poetry.
thaskalos
03-28-2015, 11:28 AM
I have no use for either party.
And yet...your anti-republican posts are so few and far between.
Clocker
03-28-2015, 11:45 AM
And yet...your anti-republican posts are so few and far between.
Are you keeping score? Squeaky wheels get the grease. Obama is the squeakiest of them all. I have already gotten grief here for saying that Cruz and Carson are unelectable, and have stated a number of times that Bush was a failed president. Am I required to post an equal number of posts about each side to show that I have no love lost for either side?
thaskalos
03-28-2015, 11:56 AM
Are you keeping score? Squeaky wheels get the grease. Obama is the squeakiest of them all. I have already gotten grief here for saying that Cruz and Carson are unelectable, and have stated a number of times that Bush was a failed president. Am I required to post an equal number of posts about each side to show that I have no love lost for either side?
No...I am not "keeping score"; there is no need to keep score when it comes to your posting history here. I am just saying that your claim of being fair and unbiased is certainly one of the most laughable declarations that I've ever seen made on this board.
For heaven's sake...can't you at least muster up the courage to openly admit who you really are?
Clocker
03-28-2015, 12:09 PM
I am just saying that your claim of being fair and unbiased is certainly one of the most laughable declarations that I've ever seen made on this board.
I don't claim to be unbiased. No one is. I claim to be nonpartisan. I don't think either side has the answers. I also claim to be objective about government policy based on results. My belief is that small government and minimal regulation is best for the country. If you want to call that a bias, I don't care. I think it is based on objective evidence.
I guess I have to concede that all that stuff about Boehner proves that Dirty Harry is an honorable man.
Did you really think this straw-man would fly?I never asserted that Reid was or was not honorable.As a career politician I take it as a given that he is corrupt.You did however assert that Bagman I mean ahh John Boener met your criterion for honorability.
No he isn't - total left wing deflection crap - he is in judicial watches 10 most corrupt list, along with many of his DEM friends
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-announces-list-of-washingtons-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-for-2013/#story9
This very same report has Bagman John at #1. :lol: :lol: :lol:
I don't claim to be unbiased. No one is. I claim to be nonpartisan. I don't think either side has the answers. I also claim to be objective about government policy based on results. My belief is that small government and minimal regulation is best for the country. If you want to call that a bias, I don't care. I think it is based on objective evidence.
Could you please draw the distinction between partisan and biased?
Clocker
03-28-2015, 12:38 PM
I based my comment about Boehner on his opposition to earmarks, and the fact that he has never asked for one. If I am otherwise wrong, then I am wrong. That does nothing to change the fact that Harry Reid is scum.
davew
03-28-2015, 12:49 PM
This very same report has Bagman John at #1. :lol: :lol: :lol:
the list is in alphabetical order and yes BOEHNER comes before REID alphabetically (you know, like in a dictionary)....
did you notice all the people associated with current administration on the list?
This thread is about Harry Reid, if you want one about 'Bagman John", start your own..
thaskalos
03-28-2015, 01:13 PM
This thread is about Harry Reid, if you want one about 'Bagman John", start your own..
Threads drift, you know...
the list is in alphabetical order and yes BOEHNER comes before REID alphabetically (you know, like in a dictionary)....
did you notice all the people associated with current administration on the list?
This thread is about Harry Reid, if you want one about 'Bagman John", start your own..
I stated no reason for his #1 position, only that he occupied it.But your command of the complex concept of alphabetical order is impressive none the less.
davew
03-28-2015, 01:56 PM
I stated no reason for his #1 position, only that he occupied it.But your command of the complex concept of alphabetical order is impressive none the less.
typical dem deflection - stating obvious as if it meant something trying to cover up own party's ineptitude.
GaryG
03-28-2015, 02:57 PM
typical dem deflection - stating obvious as if it meant something trying to cover up own party's ineptitude.This is what happens when the Muslim in the WH, Hilliary, Dingy Harry or other democrats are caught lying. The partisans attempt to defend him by talking about Bush. There is no defense for the indefensible.
thaskalos
03-28-2015, 03:46 PM
This is what happens when the Muslim in the WH, Hilliary, Dingy Harry or other democrats are caught lying. The partisans attempt to defend him by talking about Bush. There is no defense for the indefensible.
I remember submitting a post while Bush was still president...where I called him an embarrassment to every citizen of this country...and you attacked me by calling me an even bigger embarrassment to this board. So...according to you...it is inappropriate for us to EVER criticize Bush, right? If we criticized him then, we were an "embarrassment"...and if we criticize him now, we are just whining, and defending the embarrassing democrats now in charge.
So, according to you...WHEN is it ever safe for us to criticize a horrible republican president?
Threads drift, you know...
Hank is professional "drifter."
He is unable to intelligently dispute topics so he throws threads on if different directions.
No one here takes him seriously. :lol::lol::lol:
So, according to you...WHEN is it ever safe for us to criticize a horrible republican president?
I've started thread criticizing him.
But we all see what Hank is doing here.......trying to deflect the discussion away from the truth of the worthless Ding Harry.
Hank is professional "drifter."
He is unable to intelligently dispute topics so he throws threads on if different directions.
No one here takes him seriously. :lol::lol::lol:
Tom make Hank very sad.
:(
badcompany
03-30-2015, 06:28 PM
At least the Dems don't have to worry about Schumer injuring himself on an exercise machine.
http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l142/thinlizzy21/1e6da9eb1874a721db9e61a94bb3cf49_zpsif94poef.jpg
NJ Stinks
03-30-2015, 07:55 PM
Hank is professional "drifter."
He is unable to intelligently dispute topics so he throws threads on if different directions.
No one here takes him seriously. :lol::lol::lol:
How long have you lived on Fantasy Island? :rolleyes:
JustRalph
03-31-2015, 10:07 AM
Lying Bastard
http://freebeacon.com/politics/harry-reid-justifies-lying-about-romney-from-senate-floor-he-didnt-win-did-he/
Typical part of the machine
Just another lying SOB slithering around the senate.
Dingy Harry's entire life has been a mistake and a waste.
He was always without integrity, honesty, or morality.
Get the garbage can ready, and line up two pall bearers.
When he kicks the bucket, we party!
Greyfox
03-31-2015, 11:26 AM
Just another lying SOB slithering around the senate.
Dingy Harry's entire life has been a mistake and a waste.
He was always without integrity, honesty, or morality.
Get the garbage can ready, and line up two pall bearers.
When he kicks the bucket, we party!
There you go showering him with affection and kindness again.
Quit being so nice to this quitter. I can't stand it. :D
Clocker
04-04-2015, 12:27 AM
Here is a story, which the blogger admits is pure hearsay, about what really happened to Harry Reid. The story seems logical except that the source claims to be an AA coach, and telling it seems to violate the principles of AA. The blogger does not address that issue.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015/04/what-really-happened-to-harry-reid-part-3.php
davew
04-04-2015, 10:47 AM
Here is a story, which the blogger admits is pure hearsay, about what really happened to Harry Reid. The story seems logical except that the source claims to be an AA coach, and telling it seems to violate the principles of AA. The blogger does not address that issue.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015/04/what-really-happened-to-harry-reid-part-3.php
That looks more likely than a spring break injury. I did read that Harry was a professional boxer in his younger years. Possibly getting to old to knock out his drunk brother (or used restraint not to kill him).
fast4522
04-04-2015, 12:54 PM
I called it in the second post of the thread previous with this consummate liar.
http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=119381&page=1&highlight=harry+reid
Greyfox
04-04-2015, 12:56 PM
Here is a story, which the blogger admits is pure hearsay, about what really happened to Harry Reid. The story seems logical except that the source claims to be an AA coach, and telling it seems to violate the principles of AA. The blogger does not address that issue.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2015/04/what-really-happened-to-harry-reid-part-3.php
Whether true or false, that is a terrible story to come out about an AA Meeting.
It will discourage AA attenders from going to meetings.
Who can trust anyone anywhere nowadays with so many people carrying around gadgets that record conversations or videos anytime?
If you can't trust an AA meeting, who can you trust?
Clocker
04-04-2015, 01:10 PM
Whether true or false, that is a terrible story to come out about an AA Meeting.
I agree. If that story is true, at least two people at that meeting went public with what happened.
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.