PDA

View Full Version : Yemen: U.S. Forces Evacuate Base As Al Qaeda Seizes City


JustRalph
03-21-2015, 08:17 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/21/us-forces-evacuate-yemen_n_6915786.html?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000067

Hell of a headline to read, considering OBAMA told us AQ was on the run, practically decimated.

The man is responsible for rampant growth in multiple terror networks

horses4courses
03-21-2015, 08:30 PM
100 US troops, who must have had this exit planned a while ago.

I'm surprised you didn't add that the POTUS is enjoying
basketball and golf as all this is going down. :rolleyes:

JustRalph
03-21-2015, 08:44 PM
100 US troops, who must have had this exit planned a while ago.

I'm surprised you didn't add that the POTUS is enjoying
basketball and golf as all this is going down. :rolleyes:

You just swallow anything your side tells you, don't you.....?


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IqsnaPDhcwM

IqsnaPDhcwM

Watch him brag about Yemen

Clocker
03-21-2015, 08:48 PM
Watch him brag about Yemen

He is going to be shocked when he wakes up tomorrow and reads about this in the paper.

horses4courses
03-21-2015, 08:57 PM
Yemen has been deteriorating for weeks and months.
This isn't exactly big news.
Western nationals had been leaving there for some time.
Instability did not occur overnight.

Yes, the massacre at the mosque yesterday was a horrific tragedy.
Unfortunately, it won't be the last of the turmoil.

JustRalph
03-22-2015, 12:43 AM
Yemen has been deteriorating for weeks and months.
This isn't exactly big news.
Western nationals had been leaving there for some time.
Instability did not occur overnight.

Yes, the massacre at the mosque yesterday was a horrific tragedy.
Unfortunately, it won't be the last of the turmoil.

So you admit OBAMA blew it and lied about it being a success

horses4courses
03-22-2015, 09:45 AM
So you admit OBAMA blew it and lied about it being a success

It probably isn't his best moment in charge.
However, things change quickly in volatile regions like Yemen.

A mistake, but hardly a "Mission Accomplished"

lamboguy
03-22-2015, 10:01 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/21/us-forces-evacuate-yemen_n_6915786.html?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000067

Hell of a headline to read, considering OBAMA told us AQ was on the run, practically decimated.

The man is responsible for rampant growth in multiple terror networks
when its all said and done, the only one that will be on the run will be Obama, and i suspect you won't be able to find him with a search warrant.

horses4courses
03-22-2015, 10:06 AM
when its all said and done, the only one that will be on the run will be Obama, and i suspect you won't be able to find him with a search warrant.

I'll wager he will enjoy life out of office more than his predecessors.
Bush and Cheney are in danger of arrest in many countries outside the US.

Clocker
03-22-2015, 10:44 AM
I'll wager he will enjoy life out of office more than his predecessors.
Bush and Cheney are in danger of arrest in many countries outside the US.

I'll wager Obama will enjoy life out of office more than he enjoys life in office. He is obviously a short timer, not even trying to do the job.

The Bush and Cheney story is pure idiocy. It have been checked many times, and there is no evidence that any country or international authority has issued arrest warrants for either.

ArlJim78
03-22-2015, 11:06 AM
odd how under Obama ISIS/al Qaeda has been right there to grab our abandoned weapons. Iraq, Libya, Yemen. In fact I'm convinced the whole reason for the raid on Libya was to grab land, oil, money and weapons, under the guise of doing something about Qaddafi. The raid on our Benghazi office was part of the weapons looting process.

Thank goodness Egypt stood up to him and threw out his Muslim Brotherhood cronies on their ear.

Marshall Bennett
03-22-2015, 12:03 PM
When Obama leaves office he'll pack up Michelle and kids and live abroad wherever he wishes. He'll live like a king no doubt. Why would he remain here in a country he obviously detest?
ISIS will flourish and he'll be safe and sound. What happens here as a result of his reckless leadership is anyone's guess, but it can't be good.

Clocker
03-22-2015, 12:35 PM
When Obama leaves office he'll pack up Michelle and kids and live abroad wherever he wishes.

Rumor is that Obama bought the "Magnum, P.I." mansion in Hawaii.

http://www.kitv.com/news/rumors-swirl-around-sale-of-waimanalo-estate/31880764

Strange that a man that believes so strongly in global warming and rising oceans would buy beach front property.

classhandicapper
03-22-2015, 01:25 PM
If my goal was to destroy the United States, I would be smart enough to know you couldn't do it quickly. It would have to be a slow almost imperceptible process.

You'd have to very slowly erode its position economically with a lot more debt and by adding more unfunded long term obligations and promises.

You'd have to flood country with uneducated and low skilled workers that would drain resources and politically move the country further towards the path of economic suicide.

You'd have to add regulations and programs that would further incentivize business and capital to leave the country.

You have to slowly strengthen our foreign policy adversaries by withdrawing and showing the kind of weakness that emboldens them to be aggressive and make gains against us.

Basically, I'd be the Obama administration.

Saratoga_Mike
03-22-2015, 03:32 PM
It probably isn't his best moment in charge.
However, things change quickly in volatile regions like Yemen.

A mistake, but hardly a "Mission Accomplished"

The irony is every neo-con on this board was clamoring to spread democracy to the Middle East under GWB, apparently to ignorant to realize the fallout. On this one, you're correct.

woodtoo
03-22-2015, 05:32 PM
If my goal was to destroy the United States, I would be smart enough to know you couldn't do it quickly. It would have to be a slow almost imperceptible process.

You'd have to very slowly erode its position economically with a lot more debt and by adding more unfunded long term obligations and promises.

You'd have to flood country with uneducated and low skilled workers that would drain resources and politically move the country further towards the path of economic suicide.

You'd have to add regulations and programs that would further incentivize business and capital to leave the country.

You have to slowly strengthen our foreign policy adversaries by withdrawing and showing the kind of weakness that emboldens them to be aggressive and make gains against us.

Basically, I'd be the Obama administration.

Yes things seem to be going along accordingly,as planned.

JustRalph
03-22-2015, 06:09 PM
The irony is every neo-con on this board was clamoring to spread democracy to the Middle East under GWB, apparently to ignorant to realize the fallout. On this one, you're correct.

Some were clamoring for a wholesale occupation.

But noooooo.......

Saratoga_Mike
03-22-2015, 06:24 PM
Some were clamoring for a wholesale occupation.

But noooooo.......

If you think occupying Iraq would have stabilized the rest of the Middle East, you're deluding yourself. By implicitly suggesting we needed to occupy Iraq, you implicitly admit the invasion destabilized the Middle East. On that, we agree. Jim Baker was right.

Clocker
03-22-2015, 06:29 PM
The irony is every neo-con on this board was clamoring to spread democracy to the Middle East under GWB, apparently to ignorant to realize the fallout.

The topic is full of irony. Bush ran in 2000 opposed to nation building. He flip flopped, no doubt with a lot of convincing from Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz.

Obama says he is opposed to nation building, but still thinks that he can impose democracy on the middle east through strength of his negotiating skills. Both were very naive on the subject. They don't want democracy over there.

Clocker
03-22-2015, 07:12 PM
Congrats on a new personal low in repulsive pictures. Mission Accomplished.

horses4courses
03-22-2015, 07:16 PM
Congrats on a new personal low in repulsive pictures. Mission Accomplished.

Aww....I'm sorry I couldn't sugarcoat it a little for you.
War is horrific.

Clocker
03-22-2015, 07:28 PM
War is horrific.

So is using a picture of wounded soldiers for a political cheap shot when you have nothing intelligent to say.

JustRalph
03-22-2015, 09:55 PM
If you think occupying Iraq would have stabilized the rest of the Middle East, you're deluding yourself. By implicitly suggesting we needed to occupy Iraq, you implicitly admit the invasion destabilized the Middle East. On that, we agree. Jim Baker was right.

I said we should build a giant Airbase/Army Marine facility in the middle of Iraq. Control the region from the ground and sky and we should have been pumping cheap oil for the last ten years................but alas.......I didn't get my way

classhandicapper
03-23-2015, 09:32 AM
If you think occupying Iraq would have stabilized the rest of the Middle East, you're deluding yourself. By implicitly suggesting we needed to occupy Iraq, you implicitly admit the invasion destabilized the Middle East. On that, we agree. Jim Baker was right.

We made 2 mistakes.

1. The bigger mistake was going in to begin with

2. The recent mistake was not negotiating a way to stay longer so we could continue to help secure the place. Once we broke it (Iraq), we had a moral obligation (to the world) to make sure all hell didn't break loose.

We left. Predictably, all hell broke loose. Now we are being forced to get involved again. So exactly what was the purpose of leaving other than Obama keeping a campaign promise and opening to the door to all the factions that were trying to get us out of there to try to gain power and wreak havoc?

PaceAdvantage
03-23-2015, 01:49 PM
Congrats on a new personal low in repulsive pictures. Mission Accomplished.H4C is now banned from off-topic

woodtoo
03-23-2015, 01:54 PM
H4C is now banned from off-topic

Can't say I didn't see that coming.....and there was peace across the lands.

Marshall Bennett
03-23-2015, 03:44 PM
The picture was hurtful to anyone that cares.

DJofSD
03-23-2015, 03:48 PM
The picture was hurtful to anyone that cares.
Damn, I missed it.

ArlJim78
03-23-2015, 04:38 PM
I missed the picture because I have him on ignore, his posting content so juvenile.

TJDave
03-23-2015, 05:09 PM
H4C is now banned from off-topic

Excellent. Soon, everyone will be preaching to the choir. I'm sure it will make for lively discussion.

Clocker
03-23-2015, 05:30 PM
Excellent. Soon, everyone will be preaching to the choir. I'm sure it will make for lively discussion.

There wasn't any discussion from horsey, just moronic propaganda graphics filled with irrelevancies or lies.

TJDave
03-23-2015, 05:37 PM
There wasn't any discussion from horsey, just moronic propaganda graphics filled with irrelevancies or lies.

So you say. I enjoyed most of his posts. Didn't see this one, though.

Clocker
03-23-2015, 09:23 PM
So you say. I enjoyed most of his posts.

That's why there are different flavors of ice cream. But he has no one but himself to blame. And this wasn't the first time he posted real garbage.

PaceAdvantage
03-23-2015, 10:54 PM
Excellent. Soon, everyone will be preaching to the choir. I'm sure it will make for lively discussion.You don't see me banning mostpost or any of the other left-leaners who don't post graphic pictures of injured soldiers...blood and guts and gore aren't images that are allowed to be posted here...and when you post such pictures of American soldiers to make some nonexistent point that somehow, there are those of us here who have no clue that war can be brutal...well, too bad, so sad....you're not going to be posting on off-topic anymore.

I recently banned some off-the-wall right-leaner from posting in off-topic...does that make you feel better TJD?

rastajenk
03-24-2015, 07:41 AM
There wasn't any discussion from horsey, just moronic propaganda graphics filled with irrelevancies or lies.
Amen to that; just another empty conduit to the MotherShip.

JustRalph
03-25-2015, 09:19 PM
Saudis Now moving in to fight

More Gulf neighbors looking to move with them

Sure is a strange "success" Mr President

highnote
03-27-2015, 03:19 PM
Saudis Now moving in to fight

More Gulf neighbors looking to move with them

Sure is a strange "success" Mr President


This Stratfor article addresses the issues in Yemen:

Saudi Arabia and Iran Compete in Yemen


Analysis
March 25, 2015 | 08:58 GMT

Summary

While the al-Houthi movement struggles to manage multiple regional challenges to its north, its rise to power in Yemen is a setback for Saudi Arabia on its southern flank. After the fall of the Yemeni government, Riyadh will have to capitalize on the al-Houthis' need for political and financial support to re-establish its influence in the country. But because Iran is trying to fill that support gap, too, Yemen has become another battleground where the two sectarian rivals will struggle against one another.

Analysis

After being driven from the capital of Sanaa in September, Yemen's government is at war with itself. President Abd Rabboh Mansour Hadi issued a statement March 19 denouncing the airstrikes on his compound in the southern port city of Aden as an attempted military coup by forces loyal to his predecessor and one-time ally, former President Ali Abdullah Saleh. Earlier that day, soldiers and militiamen loyal to Hadi battled their way into Aden's airport and stormed a nearby military base, both of which were under the control of Gen. Abdel-Hafez al-Saqqaf, a Saleh loyalist.

The infighting in Aden comes after Ansar Allah, the pro-Iranian Zaidi group led by Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, emerged as the single largest force in the country after taking over large swathes of territory in north and central Yemen. The al-Houthis represent a change in the balance of power in Yemen and even the Arabian Peninsula that has opened the door for Iran to become a major player in what was the exclusive domain of Saudi Arabia not too long ago.

The Rise of the al-Houthis

A number of factors facilitated the al-Houthis' power grab in Yemen. First, Saudi Arabia's attempts to manage the Yemeni government in the wake of Arab Spring protests did not go as planned. Saleh stepped down in favor of his one-time vice president, Hadi, but the move exacerbated intra-government fissures along tribal, ideological, political and military lines. By the time Hadi took over, Riyadh's method of playing the various Yemeni factions against each other had undermined the old system to the point where the al-Houthis could take advantage of and align enough tribes to push beyond its northern stronghold of Saada and make their way down into areas south of the capital.



While Saudi Arabia has long meddled in Yemen and focused on combatting al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, Riyadh lost sight of developments in Yemen while focusing on other regional fights. Saudi Arabia has been trying to stem chaos in the region in the aftermath of the Arab Spring, especially threats from transnational jihadist groups such as the Islamic State. It has also been occupied with supporting Bahrain's pro-Saudi Sunni monarchy as it faces a democratic uprising from its Shiite majority. It was not that Saudi Arabia was not paying attention to Yemen, but it was not expecting Iran to gain ground on its southern frontier via a movement that is not a traditional Shiite one and in fact is theologically closer to Sunni Islam.

Also, Saudi Arabia did not do enough to prevent Saleh from returning to Sanaa, where he could plot against those he felt were responsible for his fall from power and execute his own return. His plotting weakened the Yemeni government and diminished its ability to combat the al-Houthi insurgency.

Finally, it appears the al-Houthis have learned lessons from when they clashed with Saudi border guards in 2009. Now the al-Houthis are taking caution to steer clear of any direct engagement with the Saudis along the border and have instead focused inward. They are consolidating the nascent power they have accumulated and are weakening groups that might resist them.



The strategy appears to have worked. The Saudis have focused on the conflicts to their north and have not reacted aggressively to the power shift that has taken place in Yemen. Now it is too late to reverse course — at least in the short term. Riyadh lacks the military capabilities to directly intervene in the country and impose order like it did in Bahrain. Also, the different political factions they used to operate through by proxy do not have the same power they once did, making any efforts less effective.

Even if it had the means to intervene, it is not entirely clear the Saudis would want to. The al-Houthis do not pose a major threat to Saudi Arabia; on the contrary, the rebels' control over north and central Yemen insulates Saudi Arabia from the chaos in other parts of the country and especially from al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, which is a more immediate threat. The Saudis would rather have the al-Houthis on their southern border instead of a jihadist quasi-state that is hostile to them. While the Saudis would prefer not to have al-Houthi control of such a large piece of Yemen so close to their border, the situation seems to be the best outcome in a situation where all options are bad — as long as the al-Houthis do not start pushing northward.

Potential Border Incursions

Even if the al-Houthis decided to change course, Saudi Arabia would be able to defend itself. It already has a fence — though it is nothing more than a concrete-filled pipeline — with surveillance equipment in place along long stretches of the border. Nonetheless, Zaidi militiamen were able to penetrate the border in 2009, but they did not make it past the mountains. The Saudi military was able to contain them there and used airstrikes to eliminate them.

The eastern part of the border in Hadramawt is open desert with little cover to conceal an incursion force. Surveillance aircraft can spot ground vehicles from long distances, and reaching a Saudi city or even a road would require traversing hundreds of miles of desert.

The west appears to be the only place where an incursion could have success because there are mountains, roads and people there. The area also happens to be adjacent to the al-Houthi stronghold of Saada. However, the Saudi military has enough capacity to deploy forces that outnumber al-Houthi fighters. Fighting could possibly last for a while, but in the end, the al-Houthis would not be able to withstand or break through the Saudis, who have artillery and air support.

Financial Aid Is Key

The biggest factor keeping the al-Houthis from antagonizing Saudi Arabia is their need for financial support. The country's poor financial and economic situation means the al-Houthis — or any other governing group for that matter — cannot maintain order in country without external assistance. Without long-term financial support, Yemen's water shortages could turn into a humanitarian crisis that draws in Saudi Arabia, creating the need for Sanaa and Riyadh to cooperate. The al-Houthis are aware of this, explaining why they have reached out to Riyadh to participate in indirect talks.

While it would seem logical for the al-Houthis to seek more aid from Iran, they know that Tehran is not capable of matching Saudi aid, even if the West were to lift economic sanctions. Iran can provide military, intelligence, logistical, and political support, but it has little hard cash to offer. Besides, Iran is more than 1,950 kilometers (1,200 miles) from Yemen, while Saudi Arabia is just on its northern border. Saudi Arabia can also help the al-Houthis gain international recognition as the legitimate government of Yemen.

Implementing the Hezbollah Model

The al-Houthis find themselves in a situation fairly similar to that of Hezbollah in Lebanon. Both groups are the biggest force in their respective countries, but they exist within political and demographic conditions that keep them from running their countries alone. Ansar Allah is trying to emulate Hezbollah in terms of getting other factions to work with it and to form a government like the confessional democracy in Lebanon.

Ansar Allah, however, is where Hezbollah was in the 1980s, and it will need time to translate its military prowess into political power. Also, the Saudis will try to prevent the group from going the route of Hezbollah. Unlike Lebanon in the 1980s, Yemen is not under Israeli occupation, and it does not have a neighbor like Syria that the Iranians can use as a conduit to nurture the al-Houthis.

Negotiating Yemen's Future With Iran

Saudi Arabia knows the threat is not pressing and has decided to abstain from any formal diplomatic talks with Yemen. Riyadh also knows Tehran wants to use the al-Houthis to gain a seat at the negotiating table and become a stakeholder in Yemen, so it is being cautious. Ultimately, serious geographic and political limitations prevent Tehran from undermining Riyadh in Yemen.

Though the Saudis see the situation as ultimately favorable, they cannot become too comfortable and allow the al-Houthis to take hold in Sanaa. Riyadh must ensure that the opposition improves its position enough to sufficiently counter the al-Houthi movement. At the same time, Riyadh will need to engage Ansar Allah in talks at some point, especially while the opposition is weak from infighting — and jihadists reap benefits from the struggle.

Many of Ansar Allah's opponents — including tribes, religious Sunni elements and members of the ousted government's security establishment — are open to cooperating with jihadist forces to fight the al-Houthis. The Salafists and jihadists are the most eager to engage in a sectarian battle because they see it as a way to enhance their position. Saudi Arabia cannot allow al Qaeda or the Islamic State to emerge as the most effective forces against Ansar Allah.

In fact, the United States has already indicated that it will work with the al-Houthis to fight jihadists in Yemen, another sign of the shift in the United States' position in the Middle East. Washington sees Iran, Hezbollah and even the Syrian government — except for President Bashar al Assad — as partners in the fight against the Islamic State, a development Saudi Arabia feels threatened by.

If the al-Houthis successfully consolidate their power in Yemen, the southern Saudi provinces of Jizan and Najran will become vulnerable to al-Houthi expansion in the long run because of the significant Shiite Ismaili populations that live there. Certainly the Iranians would welcome this outcome, influencing their support for the Zaidis.

The Saudis see the al-Houthis as a possible threat from Iran. How the Saudis engage with the group and try to put distance between them and Iran will be a key factor to watch. Nonetheless, Yemen's deteriorating security situation has created another Saudi-Iranian geopolitical struggle that will last for the foreseeable future.

"<a href="https://www.stratfor.com/analysis/saudi-arabia-and-iran-compete-yemen">Saudi Arabia and Iran Compete in Yemen</a> is republished with permission of Stratfor."

Marshall Bennett
03-27-2015, 03:49 PM
Is this by any chance PA's record post in length? Just wondering. :cool:

Tom
03-27-2015, 03:58 PM
Battle lines are being drawn.
On the one side, all the Arab Nations and Israel.
On the other side, Iran and it's gopher, the USA.

But we got that respect of the world that Bush cost us, right boys?

highnote
03-27-2015, 04:00 PM
Is this by any chance PA's record post in length? Just wondering. :cool:


Not even close.

DJofSD
03-27-2015, 04:03 PM
Not even close.
Nope.

classhandicapper
03-27-2015, 04:08 PM
Is this by any chance PA's record post in length? Just wondering. :cool:

I had a couple longer than that on Zenyatta. :lol:

highnote
03-27-2015, 04:17 PM
I had a couple longer than that on Zenyatta. :lol:

Who was the person in off-topic that used to write James Mitchner novel-lengthed posts on the bible?

Clocker
03-27-2015, 04:22 PM
Who was the person in off-topic that used to write James Mitchner novel-lengthed posts on the bible?

Have you looked at the Religious thread lately? :rolleyes:

Clocker
03-27-2015, 04:54 PM
Saudis Now moving in to fight

More Gulf neighbors looking to move with them


Another story Obama knew nothing about until he read about it in the media.

NBC News is reporting that the Saudis and others involved gave the US no hint that this was in the works, because they believe that Obama is leaking information to Iran in the hopes of working out the nuclear agreement with them.

Engel’s report advances this to an allegation of betrayal, not just incompetence. Clearly, Saudi Arabia has little confidence left in the Obama administration; that much is evident from their actions to cut the US out of the loop on this coalition. Engel’s report strongly suggests that it’s not just incompetence that has the Saudis and other US allies rattled, but a suspicion that they’re being purposefully sold out by Obama to get a deal with Iran that will unleash their ambitions to dominate the region.

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/03/27/nbcs-engel-us-allies-fear-obama-admin-leaking-information-to-iran/

The Saudis also said recently that they won't rule out building nuclear weapons, and that they will not discuss the issue publicly. The belief is that the Saudis are in a much better position than Iran as to the ability to build the weapons, and are very worried that Iran will get nuclear capability.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-says-it-wont-rule-out-building-nuclear-weapons-10139229.html

ArlJim78
03-27-2015, 05:27 PM
Thanks to Obama Iran is now our closest ally in the Mideast.
Israel, Egypt, Saudi's, they don't/can't trust us, and who can blame them.

Clocker
03-27-2015, 05:44 PM
Thanks to Obama Iran is now our closest ally in the Mideast.
Israel, Egypt, Saudi's, they don't/can't trust us, and who can blame them.

Obama wanted to establish unity and agreement among the countries of the middle east. Mission accomplished. They all agree that they can't trust us.

ArlJim78
03-27-2015, 07:49 PM
If you're keeping score at home, we're fighting against Iran in Yemen, fighting with Iran in Iraq, and fighting both with and against Iran in Syria.

LqAuY3yOlXs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqAuY3yOlXs&feature=youtu.be

DJofSD
03-27-2015, 07:57 PM
0bama's going to be directly responsible for a hot war in the middle East. It will break out before the summer.

PaceAdvantage
03-28-2015, 12:42 AM
0bama's going to be directly responsible for a hot war in the middle East. It will break out before the summer.Wasn't this supposed to be Bush's goal...in order to full scripture in the book of Revelation? At least that's what some of the kookier left-leaners have hinted at here on off-topic over the years...

And here's Obama...getin' 'er done... :lol: :lol: :( :(

If American elects another Democrat as President after this stellar portrayal of leadership over the past 6+ years, then there is absolutely no hope left for this electorate.

rastajenk
03-28-2015, 07:12 AM
If you're keeping score at home, we're fighting against Iran in Yemen, fighting with Iran in Iraq, and fighting both with and against Iran in Syria.
All while trying to cut a deal on nukes. What could go wrong? :p

woodtoo
03-28-2015, 10:10 AM
Iran is backing Assad, Gulf states are against Assad!

Assad is against Muslim Brotherhood. MB and Obama are against

General Sisi! But gulf states are pro Sisi! Which means they're against MB.

Iran is pro Hamas, but Hamas is backing MB. Obama is backing MB.

Yet Hamas is anti USA. Gulf states are pro USA, but Turkey is pro MB

against Sisi! And Sisi is backed by the Gulf states!

Welcome to the M.E. and have a nice day.

Al- Sabah, London,UK

woodtoo
03-29-2015, 11:31 AM
Treason, the new " foreign policy "

JustRalph
03-29-2015, 04:22 PM
Remember, when OBAMA and Hillary get into office, things are going to be great. 👍

http://nypost.com/2015/03/28/obamas-race-to-chaos/

How she defends all this crap during the campaign should be interesting

You can't tell the players without a ****ing phone book sized program.

Sure glad OBAMA has everybody on the run