PDA

View Full Version : The New Discrimination: White Guys!


JustRalph
04-25-2004, 07:01 PM
Ok...the title is a little Hyperbolic.......but this is very interesting if you ask me. I remember the arguments over "words meaning something" in the last Presidential campaign. Apparently they only mean something when the speaker is the right color.......this kind of action by the Black student group cuts their credibility to nothing if you ask me. This does a disservice to their so called constituency


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,118048,00.html

COVALIS, Oregon — Barred from writing columns for the Oregon State University Daily Barometer, senior David Williams is in the eye of a storm some call a racial double standard.

The newspaper's editor fired him after he wrote: "I think blacks should be more careful in deciding whom they choose to support. They need to grow beyond the automatic reaction of defending someone because he or she shares the same skin color and is in a dilemma."

Williams, who is white, was referring to examples such as when singer R. Kelly (search), who is accused of being a child pornographer, received a standing ovation at the Soul Train Music Awards. He also cited past support for O.J. Simpson (search) and Allen Iverson (search).

"I guess this case has shown me that just because I'm a different skin color, the merits of what I wrote have been marginalized and ostracized to the point that I'm labeled everything in the book like racist, Nazi," Williams said.

A similar article, written just two days earlier by Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Leonard Pitts (search) drew no such outrage. Pitts, who is black, wrote: "Blacks ought to be more thoughtful about whom they choose to rally around, ought to be less automatic in leaping to the defense."

Although Williams admits he read Pitts' article before writing his own, he wasn't fired for plagiarism. And he was canned only after protests erupted on campus.

"I think he was fired because he's white," said talk show host Lars Larson (search). "If he had been a black student saying the same thing ... as Leonard Pitts wrote the same thing ... Leonard Pitts' opinion was welcome. His opinion was not."

Black leaders on campus disagreed with Williams' firing but admit they protested against the article and didn't take the same action for Pitts because of their different races.

Williams "does not know the experiences African-Americans have gone through. He will never know that," said Lauren Smith, president of the university's Black Student Union.

schweitz
04-25-2004, 07:07 PM
The politically correct police strike again. I think everybody is just too thin skinned these days. Of course that statement makes me a racist because I'm a middle aged white man.

kenwoodallpromos
04-25-2004, 07:12 PM
THAT is a racist statement!!LOL!! People of all colors use race as well as religion as an excuse for acting stupid. People have always liked to use labels, names, and faces for everything because people feel closer to what they identify with most. Hypothetical example:If your Dept. had a black cop vs. white cop basketball game more whites would root for whites and blacks for blacks; but on the street some cops may think its cops vs civilians regardless of color because everybody wishes they could do crime and get away with it. / People who are 50/50 as to race usually get labeled just one. / When police arrest a person who is 50% white and 50% black what is their race put as? "Mulatto"?

Tom
04-25-2004, 08:28 PM
It is always easier to blame your failures on some else. This is the MO of the so-called Balck-leaders. They do not appreciate poepl like Clarence Thomas rising to what he did on his own.
Now, in NYC, and chime in your New Yorkers who are more familiar
with this, but they have a test that they want to use to identify students who are failing early (3rd grade?) and hold them back to make sure they get the extra attention they need. This program is being called racist. The test is being labeled as prejudical and callers to a radio program this week actually suggestted that "students of color" deserve to be promoted reguardless of thier grades if white students were. It was refered to as a social education.

schweitz
04-25-2004, 08:51 PM
Originally posted by Tom

Now, in NYC, and chime in your New Yorkers who are more familiar
with this, but they have a test that they want to use to identify students who are failing early (3rd grade?) and hold them back to make sure they get the extra attention they need. This program is being called racist. The test is being labeled as prejudical and callers to a radio program this week actually suggestted that "students of color" deserve to be promoted reguardless of thier grades if white students were. It was refered to as a social education.

Yes, it is the third grade---and to pass the test you need to score only 40% and they still are against the test. UNBELIEVABLE!

dav4463
04-26-2004, 01:28 AM
I hate the job applications that list ethinicity and say "this will not be used in determining whether or not you are qualified for the job" Why ask then ? Also, it will list ASIAN, AFRICAN, LATIN, and OTHER......I hate being an OTHER !!!! I have a friend who is black who crosses out all that and lists AMERICAN, so it isn't just white people who disagree with this.

so.cal.fan
04-26-2004, 09:55 AM
dav4463:


I ALWAYS used to put OTHER on any application.
One application said "explain, if other".....I wrote down I was from the planet "CLARION".....the application went THROUGH!
Actually, I was born in Texas........oh well, close enough! LOL:D

sq764
04-26-2004, 11:18 AM
My friend sent me this article a while back.. I found it to be thought-provoking..

http://www.terry.uga.edu/~dawndba/4500BlkLikeMe.htm

Tom
04-26-2004, 10:55 PM
SoCalFan.... ARe you a Clarionite or a Clarionian? I can never remember? :p