maclr11
01-09-2014, 12:50 AM
I know a lot of people will criticize the form, but at least the form doesn't do crazy things like this.
I was reading the Countdown to the Cup magazine and noticed that they had a top brisnet speed figures chart. On the chart was a horse in spot #35 Tuff Grit.
http://www.equibase.com/profiles/Results.cfm?type=Horse&refno=9183889®istry=T
For his maiden breaking score at Fargo Downs, a bush meet, with a weekend or two of racing a year he covered the 5 1/2 furlongs in a swift 114 1/5. That somehow managed to earn him the 35th highest brisnet figure of 2013 for 2yo's. That 97 makes him a world beater.
http://www.equibase.com/premium/eqbPDFChartPlus.cfm?BORP=P&STYLE=EQB&DAY=D&tid=FAR&dt=07/20/2013&ctry=USA&race=4
So when he come to ASD for the Osiris Stakes, anyone with any logic instantly threw him out as a bush horse who crawled against a small field.
His trainer was 0 for the meet and the other horses in the race were coming off a 1-2 finish in a previous stake. Somehow unaware people who just saw the brisnet number and the lengths he won by said this horse could be good and bet him down to 6-1. He should have been 30-1 and was beaten by 24 lengths.
http://www.equibase.com/premium/eqbPDFChartPlus.cfm?BORP=P&STYLE=EQB&DAY=D&tid=ASD&dt=08/21/2013&ctry=CAN&race=3
DRF at least doesn't record numbers in the bush, so Beyer players weren't mislead like Brisnet mislead its players.
So in the end how can a) Brisnet assign such a goofy rating off such a small sample size and pedestrian time. b) not edit that rating after his poor performance c) Allow that to be published in a racing magazine as Tuff Grit being one of the 35 fastest 2yo's in North America.
Hard to have faith in Brisnet after that, how many other cases does this happen and why is it allowed to happen.
I was reading the Countdown to the Cup magazine and noticed that they had a top brisnet speed figures chart. On the chart was a horse in spot #35 Tuff Grit.
http://www.equibase.com/profiles/Results.cfm?type=Horse&refno=9183889®istry=T
For his maiden breaking score at Fargo Downs, a bush meet, with a weekend or two of racing a year he covered the 5 1/2 furlongs in a swift 114 1/5. That somehow managed to earn him the 35th highest brisnet figure of 2013 for 2yo's. That 97 makes him a world beater.
http://www.equibase.com/premium/eqbPDFChartPlus.cfm?BORP=P&STYLE=EQB&DAY=D&tid=FAR&dt=07/20/2013&ctry=USA&race=4
So when he come to ASD for the Osiris Stakes, anyone with any logic instantly threw him out as a bush horse who crawled against a small field.
His trainer was 0 for the meet and the other horses in the race were coming off a 1-2 finish in a previous stake. Somehow unaware people who just saw the brisnet number and the lengths he won by said this horse could be good and bet him down to 6-1. He should have been 30-1 and was beaten by 24 lengths.
http://www.equibase.com/premium/eqbPDFChartPlus.cfm?BORP=P&STYLE=EQB&DAY=D&tid=ASD&dt=08/21/2013&ctry=CAN&race=3
DRF at least doesn't record numbers in the bush, so Beyer players weren't mislead like Brisnet mislead its players.
So in the end how can a) Brisnet assign such a goofy rating off such a small sample size and pedestrian time. b) not edit that rating after his poor performance c) Allow that to be published in a racing magazine as Tuff Grit being one of the 35 fastest 2yo's in North America.
Hard to have faith in Brisnet after that, how many other cases does this happen and why is it allowed to happen.