Why wont Condi testify under oath?

[ljb]

After all it's not like they are going to ask her about her private sex life!!;)

[schweitz]

Bad timing on your post LJB.

[Tom]

She was not able to until she received clearence. She has it and will talk under oath.
There were points of law and seperation of powers that needed to be handled properly first.
Unlike Clarke, or whoever he REALLY is, Condy will tell the same story she already told.

Although the whole thing is moot. Obviously, lots of people screwed up to let 9-11 happen. Move one. It is what they are doing NOW that matters.

[ljb]

I figured if I posted the question here. Bush would cave and let her testify. Another success story for the libs. Thanks folks. :D

[ljb]

This may explain why Condi didn't want to testify under oath in public.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/chitribts/20040401/ts_chicagotrib/paneltoprobericecontradictions&e=5