DeoVolente
03-23-2004, 11:57 PM
I remember the ESPN guys commenting on the rail on the telecast. So
*why* did Bailey stay on it? I didn't think Birdstone good enough to
win the Derby, but I really thought he was good enough to win this.
The worst thing is the not knowing - we now really have no idea how
good the horse is or isn't.
Drying out and off are 2 different things - even muddy and sloppy
are different things. Come right down to it, muddy isn't even the
same thing at different tracks. Sloppy is closer to the same at dif
tracks that muddy will be. So really how DO you compare wet track
form when a horse goes to a dif track, runs on sloppy vs. muddy, or
good, or drying out, or whatever. They really can be quite different
since some muddy tracks are quicksand kinda sucky, some are
slippery goo, or whatever. Sloppy tracks have so much water on
them it's a different game. Or how about the rare instance or a
frozen track? That can be like running on concrete, or it might be
crusty on the top and break when you step on it.
When you come right down to it, do we really ever know how much
effect the track surface had on the horse's race? What do you do
with the old veteran who's had 20-some starts and his last 10 all
show fast tracks, but his record shows 6 off track races and he won
3 of them and was out of the money in 3. We don't know why.
That's the kind of info I'd like - were those off track races routes or
sprints? Mud, slop, what? What tracks did he run at those times - it
could have been CA and now he's in NY for all we know! You talk
about more info being what people need today, well THIS is the kind
of info that would be worth something.
Question how do you handle drying out tracks as a handicapper?
*why* did Bailey stay on it? I didn't think Birdstone good enough to
win the Derby, but I really thought he was good enough to win this.
The worst thing is the not knowing - we now really have no idea how
good the horse is or isn't.
Drying out and off are 2 different things - even muddy and sloppy
are different things. Come right down to it, muddy isn't even the
same thing at different tracks. Sloppy is closer to the same at dif
tracks that muddy will be. So really how DO you compare wet track
form when a horse goes to a dif track, runs on sloppy vs. muddy, or
good, or drying out, or whatever. They really can be quite different
since some muddy tracks are quicksand kinda sucky, some are
slippery goo, or whatever. Sloppy tracks have so much water on
them it's a different game. Or how about the rare instance or a
frozen track? That can be like running on concrete, or it might be
crusty on the top and break when you step on it.
When you come right down to it, do we really ever know how much
effect the track surface had on the horse's race? What do you do
with the old veteran who's had 20-some starts and his last 10 all
show fast tracks, but his record shows 6 off track races and he won
3 of them and was out of the money in 3. We don't know why.
That's the kind of info I'd like - were those off track races routes or
sprints? Mud, slop, what? What tracks did he run at those times - it
could have been CA and now he's in NY for all we know! You talk
about more info being what people need today, well THIS is the kind
of info that would be worth something.
Question how do you handle drying out tracks as a handicapper?